Heaven’s Vision. Earth’s Mission. One Standard.

J. Hector Garcia

THREE ANGEL’S MESSAGE: WILL AMERICA THE LAMB BECOME A DRAGON?

The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God (Psalm 9:17, KJV)

ABSTRACT

Civil oaths, particularly the presidential inauguration, serve as a profound theological lens through which to trace the cosmic conflict between the Kingdom of God and the kingdoms of this world, revealing the foundational struggle over authority, conscience, and the ultimate allegiance demanded by the divine law. Revelation 13:11 encapsulates the core message, stating, “And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon” (KJV).

WHEN SACRED OATHS EXPOSE THE COSMIC WAR!

We stand at a prophetic crossroads where the solemn rituals of statecraft echo with ancient covenant ceremonies, their modern reverberations unveiling the final stages of the Great Controversy. While contemporary society perceives political oaths as mere secular formalities, a deep dive into their biblical typology and historical manifestation exposes a stark spiritual battlefield where the principles of God’s eternal government clash with the encroaching demands of earthly powers. This inquiry seeks to unravel how a ceremony like the presidential inauguration, with its hand upon the Bible, functions not as a benign tradition but as a revelatory event, illuminating the tension between the Kingdom of Christ and the emerging image of the beast. Our purpose is to trace this thread from the plains of Moab to the marble steps of modern capitals, demonstrating that the true conflict is over the sovereignty of divine law and the freedom of the human conscience, a freedom now hanging in the balance as nations forget their covenantal foundations. We must understand this dynamic, for within it lies the key to our loyalty, our witness, and our understanding of the times in which we live.

WHEN COVENANT ECHOES ON STONE STEPS!

The spectacle of a national leader swearing an oath upon the sacred text is not a novelty of modern democracy but a faint, fragmented echo of Israel’s covenant renewal ceremonies, a poignant reminder of a neglected divine ideal for civil governance. Where the world sees a transfer of political power, the spiritually discerning ear hears the distant whispers of Moses’ final charge to Israel, a charge meant to frame all earthly authority under the supreme jurisdiction of Heaven. This inaugural ritual, in its most profound sense, is a secularized shadow of a holy ordinance, a pageant that unconsciously testifies to a truth it often denies in practice: that all legitimate authority derives from and is accountable to the Lawgiver. The tension is palpable, like a beautifully crafted musical instrument playing a song vastly different from its composer’s intent, its form perfect but its melody distorted. You can feel the weight of history in that moment, the solemnity borrowed from a sacred source now repurposed for a temporal end, creating a dissonance that resonates through the ages. I reflect on this with a sense of poignant irony, recognizing how humanity continually borrows from God’s treasury of symbols to dignify its own structures, even while resisting the substantive obedience those symbols demand. We, as a faith community, must discern these echoes, not to sanctify the state but to understand the prophetic template being both acknowledged and violated. The principle is anchored in Scripture, for the king in Israel was never autonomous. Deuteronomy 17:18-19 mandated that the monarch write a personal copy of God’s law, a profound act of submission, “And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites: And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, to keep all the words of this law and these statutes, to do them.” Joshua, leading the nation, renewed the covenant at Shechem, placing the choice squarely before the people, “And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.” (Joshua 24:15, KJV). The Psalms repeatedly affirm that the throne itself is established on righteousness, “Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne: mercy and truth shall go before thy face.” (Psalm 89:14, KJV). Solomon, at the dedication of the temple, acknowledged this divine suzerainty, pleading, “That he may incline our hearts unto him, to walk in all his ways, and to keep his commandments, and his statutes, and his judgments, which he commanded our fathers.” (1 Kings 8:58, KJV). The prophet Jeremiah, even in announcing judgment, held up the standard of covenantal obedience for kings, “Thus saith the Lord, Execute ye judgment and righteousness, and deliver the spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor: and do no wrong, do no violence to the stranger, the fatherless, nor the widow, neither shed innocent blood in this place.” (Jeremiah 22:3, KJV). Ultimately, Christ declared all authority His own, a claim that relativizes every earthly power, “And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.” (Matthew 28:18, KJV). The inspired pen powerfully connects this to governance, stating, “The government under which Jesus lived was corrupt and oppressive; on every hand were crying abuses,—extortion, intolerance, and grinding cruelty. Yet the Saviour attempted no civil reforms. He attacked no national abuses, nor condemned the national enemies.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 509, 1898). A prophetic voice clarifies the source of true authority, writing, “God has invested men with power and influence, to be used not for self-exaltation, but for the glory of God and the good of their fellow men.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 276, 1889). In Patriarchs and Prophets, we find the foundational principle, “The prosperity of nations depends upon the blessing of God. This blessing cannot be expected while they neglect the claims of heaven.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 592, 1890). Through inspired counsel we are told, “Rulers and statesmen, judges and lawyers, men of business and men of science, all need to comprehend the wisdom and righteousness of the divine law.” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 306, 1900). A passage from Prophets and Kings expands this, “In the laws committed to Israel, explicit instruction was given concerning education. To Moses at Sinai God had revealed Himself as ‘merciful and gracious, long-suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth.’” (Prophets and Kings, p. 187, 1917). The prophetic messenger notes the consequence of neglect, “When kings and rulers, nobles and merchants, farmers and tradesmen, shall come to the point of deciding the question for themselves, then they will see that it is not the voice of God that is speaking to them, but the voice of the dragon.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 452, 1889). The modern oath, therefore, stands as a haunted monument, its form acknowledging a King it refuses to obey, creating a spiritual schizophrenia at the heart of power. Yet, if this ceremony is a ghost of a godly covenant, from what specific soil did the American iteration of this idea sprout, and what distinctive seed was planted?

WHEN TRUTH SPARKS DEFIANCE AGAINST TYRANNY!

The American founding was uniquely midwifed by a specific text—the Geneva Bible—whose marginal notes supplied not just commentary but a revolutionary theology of resistance, embedding the duty of disobedience to tyrannical authority deep within the Protestant consciousness that shaped a nation. While the King James Version would later become the ceremonial text, it was the Geneva Bible, carried on the Mayflower and studied in Puritan homes, that forged the intellectual and spiritual framework which understood liberty of conscience as a divine mandate requiring defense, even against kingly decree. This distinction is not academic; it is the genetic code of a certain understanding of freedom, one that saw the state as subservient to a higher law, a perspective that would directly birth the concept of civil disobedience foundational to the American experiment. You can sense the radical energy in those margins, like embers smuggled across an ocean, ready to ignite a new world order built on the idea that God’s law transcends Caesar’s. I ponder the courage of those exiles, who translated scripture under the shadow of Bloody Mary’s fires, embedding within the holy text itself a justification for defying ungodly power. We, as heirs of the Reformation, must recover this clarion call, for it is the antithesis of the blind obedience that the dragon demands. The scriptural warrants for this stance are unambiguous. The apostles themselves set the precedent when confronted by the Sanhedrin, “Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.” (Acts 5:29, KJV). This principle finds its roots in the defiance of the Hebrew midwives, who “feared God, and did not as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the men children alive.” (Exodus 1:17, KJV). Daniel and his friends exemplify this resistance, choosing the king’s pulse over his defiling meat, “But Daniel purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself with the portion of the king’s meat, nor with the wine which he drank.” (Daniel 1:8, KJV). The three worthies before Nebuchadnezzar’s image declared their allegiance regardless of consequence, “If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, O king. But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.” (Daniel 3:17-18, KJV). The psalmist declares trust in God over human power, “It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man. It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in princes.” (Psalm 118:8-9, KJV). Christ Himself distinguished between the spheres of legitimate authority, “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.” (Matthew 22:21, KJV), a statement that inherently limits Caesar’s reach. Ellen G. White, in The Great Controversy, frames this conflict cosmically, “The Protestants of the Reformation affirmed the authority of the Word of God above the authority of the church and the state.” (The Great Controversy, p. 204, 1911). A prophetic voice from Testimonies for the Church warns of the coming test, “As the approach of the Roman armies was a sign to the disciples of the impending destruction of Jerusalem, so may this apostasy be a sign to us that the limit of God’s forbearance is reached.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 451, 1889). In The Acts of the Apostles, we read of the early church’s stance, “The disciples were not to be intimidated by threatenings nor terrified by persecution. They were to go forward with the work of teaching and baptizing, trusting in the power of the Holy Spirit to give success to their efforts.” (The Acts of the Apostles, p. 46, 1911). Through inspired counsel we learn, “God has given us His word as a lamp to our feet and a light to our path. Its teachings have a vital bearing upon our prosperity in all the relations of life.” (Counsels to Parents, Teachers, and Students, p. 15, 1913). A passage from Thoughts from the Mount of Blessing connects this to personal integrity, “The spirit of the world is at enmity with the spirit of Christ. The two principles are antagonistic.” (Thoughts from the Mount of Blessing, p. 54, 1896). The prophetic messenger, in Patriarchs and Prophets, roots this in the nature of God’s law, “The law of God, by the worldling and the pleasure-lover, is looked upon as a restriction, a yoke; but to the obedient it is the law of liberty.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 523, 1890). The Geneva notes on Exodus 1:19, justifying the midwives’ deceit as lawful resistance, thus planted a seed that would grow into a nation conceived in lawful rebellion, a nation whose founding DNA contained a built-in antibody against absolute power. But what profound irony unfolds when a nation born of this resistance theology itself matures and, forgetting its genesis, begins to assume the mantle of the tyrant it once resisted?

LAMB-LIKE BEAST: HOW DOES DRAGON VOICE EMERGE?

The trajectory of the United States in prophecy presents a stunning paradox: a lamb-like power, rising peacefully with republican and Protestant principles, that gradually learns to “speak as a dragon,” morphing from a protector of conscience into an enforcer of conformity, thereby fulfilling a specific apocalyptic blueprint. While its origins were marked by the gentle growth of a plant from uncultivated earth—a stark contrast to the violent, beastly empires rising from the turbulent “sea” of peoples—this very gentleness contains the potential for a profound betrayal when its principles are inverted. The horns like a lamb, emblematic of innocence, civil liberty, and rejection of hierarchical tyranny, can, through a process of spiritual and moral decay, become the organs for uttering the dragon’s coercive decrees. You can visualize this transformation as a chilling drama, where a benevolent guardian, entrusted with a sacred asylum, slowly adopts the mannerisms and methods of the very monster it was meant to provide refuge from. I feel a deep sense of prophetic awe mixed with sorrow as I trace this arc, recognizing in it the sobering pattern of all human institutions that forget their dependence on divine grace. We must study this metamorphosis not with nationalistic pride nor with cynical despair, but with clear-eyed understanding, for it charts the course of the final conflict over worship. The scriptural imagery is precise. Revelation 13:11 describes the phenomenon, “And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.” This earth-born power stands in contrast to the leopard-like beast from the sea (Revelation 13:1-2), representing the oppressive union of church and state in medieval Europe. The “earth” symbolizes a relatively unpopulated area, and the lamb-like horns denote youthful, non-monarchical, and protestant characteristics. Yet the voice reveals the true nature, “And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.” (Revelation 13:12, KJV). This compulsion to worship contradicts the gospel principle, “For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another.” (Galatians 5:13, KJV). Christ’s kingdom is not of this coercive order, “Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.” (John 18:36, KJV). The apostle Paul warns of a “falling away” and the rise of a “man of sin” who exalts himself in the temple of God, “shewing himself that he is God.” (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, KJV). The book of Daniel foresees a power that “shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws.” (Daniel 7:25, KJV). Peter warns of false teachers who will bring in “damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them.” (2 Peter 2:1, KJV). Ellen G. White, in The Great Controversy, directly identifies this prophetic entity, “The lamb-like horns and dragon voice of the symbol point to a striking contradiction between the professions and the practice of the nation thus represented. The ‘speaking’ of the nation is the action of its legislative and judicial authorities.” (The Great Controversy, p. 442, 1911). A prophetic voice in Testimonies for the Church explains the underlying shift, “The nation will be on the side of the great rebel leader.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 451, 1889). In Maranatha, we read, “This country will follow in the steps of Rome in trampling on the rights of conscience.” (Maranatha, p. 197, 1976). Through inspired counsel we are told, “When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government, and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 451, 1889). A passage from Early Writings provides the symbolic key, “I saw that the two horns were like the horns of a lamb, but they spoke as the dragon. This represents the Protestant government, which will give life to the papal power.” (Early Writings, p. 274, 1858). The prophetic messenger, in Selected Messages, warns of the method, “The Protestant world today see in the little company of Sabbathkeepers a sect like the Jews, but they will see that God is with us.” (Selected Messages, book 3, p. 386, 1958). The transition from lamb-like to dragon-voiced is not a sudden revolution but a gradual apostasy, a forgetting of the Geneva margins, where the state, originally designed to protect the church from coercion, is seduced by the churches into becoming their instrument of enforcement. But what historical precedent exists for this specific betrayal, where religious bodies seek the state’s power to legislate dogma?

SUNDAY LAW CRISIS: WHAT 1888 FORESHADOWED?

The year 1888 serves as a prophetic dress rehearsal, a clear historical lens through which to see the mechanism by which a lamb-like nation begins to “speak as a dragon,” as Protestant churches actively lobbied the state to enact Sunday sacredness legislation, directly challenging the principles of religious liberty upon which the nation was founded. While the immediate legislative push—the Blair Sunday Rest Bill—was defeated, the theological arguments, alliances, and intentions revealed during the congressional hearings illuminated the precise blueprint for the future national apostasy foretold in Revelation 13. This episode was not an isolated political skirmish but a stunningly accurate enactment of the prophetic warning, demonstrating how well-intentioned religious leaders, convinced of national moral decline, would seek to use the civil sword to enforce a religious observance, thereby forming an “image” to the first beast. The tension in those Senate chambers was electric, a clash of kingdoms where the serene, biblical arguments of Adventist statesman A. T. Jones confronted the earnest but misguided theocratic ambitions of Senator Blair and the National Reform Association. You can feel the historical gravity of that moment, as if a door to the future was briefly swung open, allowing a glimpse of the final crisis. I study this event with intense personal application, asking where I might be tempted to seek the arm of flesh to advance divine truth. We must comprehend this history, for the spirit of 1888 did not die; it merely retreated underground, awaiting a more favorable season of national distress. The scriptural warnings against such church-state unions are severe. Christ rebuked the use of force in His kingdom, “But Jesus said unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword.” (Matthew 26:52, KJV). The prophet Isaiah condemns covenants with death and agreements with hell, “Your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand.” (Isaiah 28:18, KJV). James defines pure religion as keeping oneself “unspotted from the world.” (James 1:27, KJV). Paul warns believers not to be “unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?” (2 Corinthians 6:14, KJV). The book of Revelation pronounces a dire warning on those who worship the beast or his image, “The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation.” (Revelation 14:10, KJV). The three angels’ messages, in contrast, call for worship of the Creator, which is intrinsically tied to His Sabbath, “Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.” (Revelation 14:7, KJV). Ellen G. White, commenting directly on the 1888 crisis, wrote, “The dignitaries of church and state will unite to bribe, persuade, or compel all classes to honor the Sunday. The lack of divine authority will be supplied by oppressive enactments.” (The Great Controversy, p. 592, 1911). A prophetic voice in Testimonies to Ministers stated, “The protest of the Reformers against the abuse of authority by the church is now needed against the abuse of authority by the state.” (Testimonies to Ministers, p. 362, 1923). In Selected Messages, we find this analysis, “The Sunday movement is now making its way in darkness. The leaders are concealing the true issue, and many who unite in the movement do not themselves see whither the undercurrent is tending.” (Selected Messages, book 2, p. 368, 1958). Through inspired counsel we learn, “The enforcement of Sundaykeeping on the part of Protestant churches is an enforcement of the worship of the papacy—of the beast.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 8, p. 117, 1904). A passage from The Review and Herald warned, “The time is coming when we shall be brought before councils, and every position of truth which we hold will be severely criticized.” (The Review and Herald, June 8, 1910). The prophetic messenger, in Counsels for the Church, summarized the principle, “God has not committed to us the work of making laws to govern the conscience.” (Counsels for the Church, p. 315, 1991). The defeat of the Blair Bill was a temporary victory for liberty, but it revealed the heart of the conflict: a desire to use the state’s coercive power to create a uniform moral society, a desire that directly contradicts the gospel method of transformation by the Spirit through truth. But what underlying spiritual and moral condition creates a populace and its leaders so willing to trade liberty for a false security?

WHEN CORRUPTION OPENS THE DOOR TO TYRANNY!

The pathway from a republic of laws to a tyranny of dogma is paved not by sudden coups but by the gradual, often welcomed, erosion of public and private morality, a decay that creates a vacuum of virtue which the populace, in its panic, begs the state to fill with coercive legislation. While the founders understood that their constitutional machinery could only function among a moral and religious people, the systematic rejection of the knowledge of God—the very foundation of morality—produces a social chaos that makes the strong hand of enforced conformity appear not as tyranny but as salvation. This process is insidious, like a body weakening its immune system through poor habits until it becomes susceptible to a deadly pathogen that a healthy body would easily resist; the pathogen of religious coercion finds fertile ground only in a nation that has forgotten the source of its strength. You can sense this decline in the cultural shift from principle to pragmatism, from duty to desire, where the image of God in every human is eclipsed by utilitarian calculations. I reflect with grief on how our own communities may contribute to this decay through compromise and worldliness. We must sound the alarm, not just on future Sunday laws, but on the moral abdication that makes them thinkable. The Bible is replete with warnings about this causal link. Solomon, the wisest king, stated the principle succinctly, “Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.” (Proverbs 14:34, KJV). The prophet Hosea lamented the root cause, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” (Hosea 4:6, KJV). The Psalmist warns of the fate of forgetful nations, “The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.” (Psalm 9:17, KJV). Jeremiah connects national judgment directly to moral failure, “Run ye to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem, and see now, and know, and seek in the broad places thereof, if ye can find a man, if there be any that executeth judgment, that seeketh the truth; and I will pardon it.” (Jeremiah 5:1, KJV). The history of Israel is a cyclical testimony: obedience brought prosperity, “Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance.” (Psalm 33:12, KJV), while apostasy brought calamity, “And the Lord shall scatter you among the nations, and ye shall be left few in number among the heathen, whither the Lord shall lead you.” (Deuteronomy 4:27, KJV). Paul describes the decadent spiral of a society that suppresses truth, “And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient.” (Romans 1:28, KJV). Ellen G. White powerfully connects moral decline to prophetic fulfillment, “As the disrespect for God’s law becomes more manifest, the line of demarcation between its observers and the world becomes more distinct.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 81, 1882). A prophetic voice in Prophets and Kings writes, “The crisis is approaching when the most valuable of all education will be a knowledge of the way of the Lord.” (Prophets and Kings, p. 500, 1917). In Christ’s Object Lessons, we read, “When the rule of God is not accepted, the rule of self is established, and the government of the soul passes under the control of Satan.” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 194, 1900). Through inspired counsel we are told, “The sin of this age is disregard of God’s express commands.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 9, p. 267, 1909). A passage from Patriarchs and Prophets explains the dynamic, “Nations are measured by the One who knows. He who reads the hearts of men is weighing character, and national prosperity, and national strength.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 534, 1890). The prophetic messenger warns, “The time is fast coming when, through the devices of Satan, the laws of our land will be so shaped as to oppress those who keep the commandments of God.” (The Signs of the Times, March 20, 1893). This moral vacuum creates a desperate craving for order, making a populace willing to grant the state unprecedented power to regulate behavior and belief, thereby setting the stage for the dragon to speak through laws that punish dissent in the name of unity and morality. Yet, in the divine economy, how does God’s character, as revealed in His law and government, provide the only true antidote to this tyrannical impulse?

WHERE JUSTICE AND MERCY MEET IN GLORY!

The only enduring foundation for just governance, and the supreme antidote to the dragon’s coercive tyranny, is found in the perfect balance of justice and mercy emanating from God’s throne, a harmony symbolized by the encircling rainbow and embodied in His immutable moral law. While human systems veer between the extremes of licentious permissiveness (mercy without justice) and harsh, punitive legalism (justice without mercy), the divine government, as seen in the plan of redemption and the sanctuary typology, holds these attributes in perfect, loving tension. This “rainbow theology” reveals that true law is not the enemy of love but its expression, and true freedom is found not in license from law but in obedience to its righteous precepts, which are designed for human flourishing. The vision is breathtaking, like a perfect equilibrium where the weight of holiness is perfectly counterpoised by the uplift of grace, creating a stable platform for eternal relationship. You can find personal peace in this truth, knowing that God’s requirements are just and His provision for our failure is merciful. I stand in awe of this divine symmetry, which human philosophy has never replicated. We must proclaim this balance, for it refutes both the antinomianism that cheapens grace and the legalism that brutalizes with demands. The sanctuary itself is the great teaching model of this truth. The law within the ark, covered by the mercy seat where blood was sprinkled, provides the perfect visual, “And thou shalt put the mercy seat above upon the ark; and in the ark thou shalt put the testimony that I shall give thee.” (Exodus 25:21, KJV). The Psalms sing of this union, “Mercy and truth are met together; righteousness and peace have kissed each other.” (Psalm 85:10, KJV). The prophet Micah summarizes the divine requirement, “He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?” (Micah 6:8, KJV). God declares His own character to Moses, “The Lord, The Lord God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty.” (Exodus 34:6-7, KJV). The rainbow itself, first given to Noah, is a token of covenantal mercy grounded in justice, “I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth.” (Genesis 9:13, KJV). John’s vision of the heavenly throne includes this emblem, “And there was a rainbow round about the throne, in sight like unto an emerald.” (Revelation 4:3, KJV). Ellen G. White beautifully expounds on this symbol, “The rainbow round about the throne is an assurance that God is true, that in Him is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 9, p. 283, 1909). A prophetic voice in The Great Controversy writes, “The rainbow of promise encircling the throne on high is an everlasting testimony that ‘God so loved the world, that He gave His only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.’” (The Great Controversy, p. 636, 1911). In Patriarchs and Prophets, we read, “The rainbow, a natural phenomenon, was chosen as a symbol of the covenant between God and man.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 106, 1890). Through inspired counsel we learn, “In the gospel plan the justice and mercy of God are fully revealed.” (Selected Messages, book 1, p. 339, 1958). A passage from Thoughts from the Mount of Blessing explains, “The law of God is an expression of His character. It embodies the principles of His government.” (Thoughts from the Mount of Blessing, p. 48, 1896). The prophetic messenger, in The Desire of Ages, states, “In the matchless gift of His Son, God has encircled the whole world with an atmosphere of grace as real as the air which circulates around the globe.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 679, 1898). The dragon’s system, whether manifest as secular totalitarianism or religious coercion, always severs this unity. It offers a hollow “mercy” that winks at sin, eroding justice, or a brutal “justice” that demands compliance without providing atonement. The final crisis will force a choice between worshiping the beast—whose image offers a false, enforced unity—and worshiping the Creator, whose rainbow throne offers a salvation that satisfies both justice and mercy through Christ. But what is the ultimate consequence for a nation, founded on biblical principles, that willfully turns from this balanced vision and forgets the God of the covenant?

WHEN A NATION FORGETS GOD AND FALLS!

The deliberate, willful forgetting of God—not mere intellectual atheism but the practical rejection of His law and covenantal partnership—constitutes the prelude to national ruin, a divine withdrawal of restraining grace that leaves a society to reap the anarchic and tyrannical consequences of its own chosen path. While a nation may for a time retain the outward forms of religion and even appeal to a generic “God,” the specific rejection of the knowledge contained in His commandments, particularly those that define His authority as Creator (the Sabbath) and govern human dignity (the moral law), severs the vital connection and invites the “vomiting out” described in Leviticus. This forgetting is active; it is replacing the true God with a national idol, a god of prosperity, power, or civil religion that sanctifies the state’s ambitions. You can witness this process in the erasure of historical memory, where a nation’s covenantal origins are rewritten as secular accident. I feel a profound burden to remember and to teach remembrance, for it is our only safeguard. We, as a remnant people, are called to be living memorials, holding aloft the forgotten truths. The biblical warnings are stark and repetitive. Moses, in his final sermon, pleaded, “Only take heed to thyself, and keep thy soul diligently, lest thou forget the things which thine eyes have seen, and lest they depart from thy heart all the days of thy life: but teach them thy sons, and thy sons’ sons.” (Deuteronomy 4:9, KJV). The Psalmist’s warning is dire, “The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.” (Psalm 9:17, KJV). Hosea connects forgetting to destruction, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee… seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” (Hosea 4:6, KJV). Jeremiah condemns the pride of forgetfulness, “Thus saith the Lord, Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, neither let the mighty man glory in his might, let not the rich man glory in his riches: But let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth me, that I am the Lord which exercise lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness, in the earth.” (Jeremiah 9:23-24, KJV). The history of Israel in Judges is a cyclical tragedy of forgetting, serving new gods, being oppressed, crying out, and being delivered, “And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the Lord, and forgat the Lord their God, and served Baalim and the groves.” (Judges 3:7, KJV). Solomon, in his dedication prayer, foresaw the danger, “If they sin against thee, (for there is no man that sinneth not,) and thou be angry with them, and deliver them to the enemy… Yet if they shall bethink themselves in the land whither they were carried captives… and pray unto thee… Then hear thou their prayer and their supplication in heaven thy dwelling place, and maintain their cause.” (1 Kings 8:46-49, KJV). The book of Proverbs states the societal principle, “Where there is no vision, the people perish: but he that keepeth the law, happy is he.” (Proverbs 29:18, KJV). Ellen G. White applies this directly to America, “If men refuse to be saved by the principles of heaven, they will seek for strength in the principles of the world.” (The Signs of the Times, March 20, 1893). A prophetic voice in Testimonies for the Church warns, “The rapid increase of crime and violence in our land is the result of neglecting to educate and train the youth to obey the law of God.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 79, 1882). In Prophets and Kings, we read, “The history of nations speaks to us today. To every nation and to every individual God has assigned a place in His great plan.” (Prophets and Prophets, p. 536, 1917). Through inspired counsel we are told, “The world is forgetting God, and the church is following in its steps.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 8, p. 118, 1904). A passage from Patriarchs and Prophets explains the result, “Nations that have thus forgotten God have been made to drink the cup of His indignation.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 535, 1890). The prophetic messenger states, “When men abandon the fear of God, they trust to their own strength, and then oppression and cruelty abound.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 242, 1882). This national forgetting creates the precise conditions—social chaos, moral panic, and a loss of transcendent purpose—that make the populace clamor for the “strong” leadership of the dragon’s voice, believing that enforced religious uniformity can restore the order that only covenant faithfulness can provide. In the face of this impending rupture, what is the specific mandate for God’s people who understand these principles and see the breach widening?

CALLED TO RESTORE WHAT SIN HAS BROKEN!

The prophetic mandate for God’s remnant people in this terminal hour is to function as “repairers of the breach, restorers of paths to dwell in,” a calling that demands a twofold witness: the fearless proclamation of God’s eternal law, especially the Sabbath which marks the Creator, and the vibrant demonstration of Christ’s self-sacrificing love through practical ministry to human need. While the world and apostate religion move toward coercion and image-making, our mission is to reveal the character of God’s government through both truth and mercy, thereby exposing the fraud of the dragon’s alternatives and calling people to allegiance to the rainbow throne. This is not a passive, waiting stance but an active, healing engagement with a broken world, a testimony that true reformation begins with the heart transformed by truth and expressed in compassion. The image is powerful, like a crew working feverishly to shore up a crumbling levee, not to save the floodwaters but to preserve the ground upon which the ark of safety rests. You have a personal role in this repair work, whether in your family, your church, or your community. I commit myself anew to this dual labor, knowing it is the essence of the third angel’s message. We are to be a community of repair, our lives answering the dragon’s roar with the quiet, powerful testimony of obedience and love. The scriptural call is explicit. Isaiah 58 outlines the fast God has chosen, culminating in this promise, “And they that shall be of thee shall build the old waste places: thou shalt raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach, The restorer of paths to dwell in.” (Isaiah 58:12, KJV). This repair is directly connected to honoring the Sabbath, “If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the Lord, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words.” (Isaiah 58:13, KJV). Ezekiel’s watchman responsibility is paramount, “Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me.” (Ezekiel 3:17, KJV). The three angels’ messages of Revelation 14 are the content of our proclamation, culminating in the patience of the saints who “keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” (Revelation 14:12, KJV). Christ commissions His church, “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.” (Matthew 28:19-20, KJV). The apostolic model combined teaching and benevolence, “And they continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.” (Acts 2:42, KJV). James defines pure religion in actionable terms, “Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.” (James 1:27, KJV). Ellen G. White defines the mandate with clarity, “In a special sense Seventh-day Adventists have been set in the world as watchmen and light bearers. To them has been entrusted the last warning for a perishing world.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 9, p. 19, 1909). A prophetic voice in Christian Service writes, “Medical missionary work is the pioneer work of the gospel.” (Christian Service, p. 11, 1925). In The Ministry of Healing, we read, “Our work is to present the truth, and by earnest, faithful labor to see if we cannot save souls.” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 144, 1905). Through inspired counsel we learn, “The last message of mercy to be given to the world is a revelation of His character of love.” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 415, 1900). A passage from Evangelism instructs, “We are to present the law and the gospel together, for they go hand in hand.” (Evangelism, p. 194, 1946). The prophetic messenger, in Testimonies for the Church, links the two aspects, “The work of gospel ministers is to preach the Word, and to minister to the poor and suffering.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 6, p. 305, 1900). Our mandate, therefore, is to be living epistles of the rainbow theology—uncompromising in our adherence to God’s just law, yet overflowing with Christ-like mercy in our service to a hurting humanity. This integrated witness is the only power that can counter the dragon’s lie and prepare a people to stand when the oath of allegiance to the beast is demanded.

HOW DIVINE LOVE SHINES THROUGH EVERY TRUTH!

Every thread of this doctrinal tapestry—from the covenantal echoes in civil oaths to the prophetic warnings of tyranny—ultimately radiates from the central, blazing sun of God’s unfathomable love, a love that establishes law, provides redemption, and patiently warns of coming storms. While human power, as seen in the beast and its image, operates on control and fear, the entire divine enterprise, from the rainbow throne to the call to repair the breach, is a multi-faceted revelation of a God who desires willing allegiance born of grateful understanding. The Geneva margins advocating resistance, the lamb-like horns offering asylum, the balance of justice and mercy—all are expressions of a love that respects human freedom so profoundly it risks being rejected, a love that provides a law for our good and a Savior for our failure. This love is not a sentimental abstraction but the active, governing principle of the universe, a love that fights a cosmic war to win hearts, not to conquer territories. You can rest in this love, even amid prophetic turmoil, knowing it is your shield and your motive. I am humbled and overwhelmed when I trace this golden cord through the dark tapestry of history and prophecy. We are called to be mirrors of this love, reflecting its just and merciful light into a world descending into dragon-like coercion. Scripture roots everything in this love. “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16, KJV) is the axiom of all divine action. Paul asks, “He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?” (Romans 8:32, KJV). The very giving of the law was an act of love, “And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.” (Exodus 20:6, KJV). The psalmist exults, “The Lord is merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy.” (Psalm 103:8, KJV). The cross is love’s supreme demonstration, “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” (Romans 5:8, KJV). This love constrains our response, “For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge, that if one died for all, then were all dead.” (2 Corinthians 5:14, KJV). Ellen G. White encapsulates this truth, “The law of God is an expression of His character, and the cross of Calvary reveals to all that the principles of that law are immutable, and that God’s love for the fallen race is infinite.” (The Signs of the Times, March 20, 1893). A prophetic voice in Steps to Christ writes, “It is the grace of Christ alone, through faith, that can make us holy.” (Steps to Christ, p. 61, 1892). In The Desire of Ages, we read, “In the matchless gift of His Son, God has encircled the whole world with an atmosphere of grace as real as the air which circulates around the globe.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 679, 1898). Through inspired counsel we learn, “God’s love is the source of all healing and restoring power.” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 112, 1905). A passage from Patriarchs and Prophets reminds us, “God’s love is represented as stronger than death, than the grave.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 65, 1890). The prophetic messenger states, “The Saviour’s life of obedience maintained the claims of the law; it proved that the law could be kept, and showed the excellence of character that obedience would develop.” (The Acts of the Apostles, p. 505, 1911). Therefore, the stern warnings about the beast, the dragon’s voice, and national ruin are not the threats of a capricious deity but the urgent pleadings of a loving Father, revealing the horrific consequences of rejecting His loving government in order to spare as many as will listen. This love, perfectly expressed, necessarily calls forth a response of total commitment from the beloved.

WHAT FAITHFUL HEARTS OWE THEIR MAKER!

In light of this profound revelation of God’s character and the clarity of the coming conflict, my responsibility toward God crystallizes into a non-negotiable triad: wholehearted worship rooted in obedience to His law, unwavering loyalty expressed in fearless witness, and constant dependence fostered through prayer and study of His Word. While the world, and even apostate Christianity, may offer a diluted faith of convenience or a state-enforced religion of form, the demand of the hour is for a settled, intelligent allegiance to the God of the rainbow throne, an allegiance that prepares us to choose His seal over the beast’s mark. This responsibility is intensely personal; it is my heart answering “Here I am” to the One who gave everything for me, a response that transforms duty into delight and law into liberty. You must make this commitment your own, for no one can stand in your place. I recognize with solemn joy that my life is not my own, but a vessel to honor the One who created and redeemed me. We, as a covenant community, are called to encourage one another in this total surrender, building a bulwark of faithfulness. Scripture frames this responsibility in covenantal terms. “And now, Israel, what doth the Lord thy God require of thee, but to fear the Lord thy God, to walk in all his ways, and to love him, and to serve the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul?” (Deuteronomy 10:12, KJV). Christ confirmed the greatest commandment, “Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.” (Matthew 22:37, KJV). This love is demonstrated through obedience, “If ye love me, keep my commandments.” (John 14:15, KJV). The call to worship the Creator is central to the final crisis, “And worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.” (Revelation 14:7, KJV). Paul exhorts to a life of sacrificial worship, “I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.” (Romans 12:1, KJV). This loyalty requires separation, “Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.” (2 Corinthians 6:17, KJV). The faithful are described as those who “keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” (Revelation 14:12, KJV). Ellen G. White emphasizes the totality of this commitment, “God requires the entire surrender of the heart, before justification can take place.” (Selected Messages, book 1, p. 366, 1958). A prophetic voice in Testimonies for the Church states, “The duty of the watchman is to watch, to warn the people of their danger; not to lull them to security.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 716, 1889). In The Great Controversy, we read, “Those who would have the seal of God in their foreheads must keep the Sabbath of the fourth commandment.” (The Great Controversy, p. 640, 1911). Through inspired counsel we learn, “The Word of God is to be our guide. About everything we are to ask, Is this the way of the Lord?” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 8, p. 313, 1904). A passage from Steps to Christ outlines the process, “The condition of eternal life is now just what it always has been,—just what it was in Paradise before the fall of our first parents,—perfect obedience to the law of God, perfect righteousness.” (Steps to Christ, p. 62, 1892). The prophetic messenger warns, “We must be daily consecrated to God, or we shall be ensnared by the enemy.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 147, 1882). This responsibility to God is our anchor in the coming storm; it is the “fear of God” and the “giving of glory to Him” that the first angel proclaims, a posture of heart that will enable us to discern and reject the dragon’s deceptions. This vertical allegiance, however, must flow horizontally into tangible compassion for our fellow human beings, who are also made in God’s image.

WHEN LOVE MOVES FROM WORDS TO DEEDS!

My responsibility toward my neighbor, forged in the furnace of God’s love and informed by the prophetic crisis, is to be a minister of His mercy and a defender of his dignity, actively laboring to alleviate suffering, protect conscience, and reflect the character of Christ in every interaction, thereby providing a living testimony against the coercive, image-making power of the beast. While the dragon’s system views people as subjects to be controlled or enemies to be eliminated, the kingdom of God sees every individual as a soul of infinite value, for whom Christ died, and our duty is to serve them in a way that honors their freedom and meets their need. This compassion is not optional charity but the essential “right arm” of the gospel message, the practical demonstration that God’s law is a law of love, and that His true followers are motivated by service, not domination. You encounter this responsibility in your daily sphere—your family, your coworkers, the marginalized in your community. I am challenged to move beyond comfortable words to self-denying action, seeing in each face the image of God that the dragon seeks to erase. We are called to build communities of mutual care and bold advocacy, standing for the rights of others as we would for our own, thus manifesting the rainbow justice-mercy of God’s throne. The biblical mandate is comprehensive. Christ summarized the second great commandment, “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.” (Matthew 22:39, KJV). The parable of the Good Samaritan defines “neighbor” in the broadest terms (Luke 10:25-37). Micah 6:8 calls us “to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God.” The law itself protects the neighbor, “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour… Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house…” (Exodus 20:16-17, KJV). Paul instructs, “As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith.” (Galatians 6:10, KJV). Peter calls for active love, “Seeing ye have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto unfeigned love of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently.” (1 Peter 1:22, KJV). John makes love the test of divine indwelling, “Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God.” (1 John 4:7, KJV). James condemns faith without works, “If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?” (James 2:15-16, KJV). Ellen G. White powerfully connects this duty to our prophetic identity, “We are to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and comfort the suffering and afflicted. We are to minister to the despairing and inspire hope in the hopeless.” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 106, 1905). A prophetic voice in Welfare Ministry writes, “The living principle of love to God and to our neighbor is the great need of the world.” (Welfare Ministry, p. 31, 1952). In Christ’s Object Lessons, we read, “In the great judgment day, those who have not worked for Christ, who have drifted along thinking of themselves, caring for themselves, will be placed by the Judge of the whole earth with those who did evil.” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 371, 1900). Through inspired counsel we learn, “Our love is to be a sincere, intelligent, living principle, which should lead us to imitate the character of Christ.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 2, p. 135, 1868). A passage from The Acts of the Apostles states, “The spirit of the Saviour’s teaching is to be brought into all that we do.” (The Acts of the Apostles, p. 517, 1911). The prophetic messenger declares, “We are to be channels through which the Lord can send the truth and light to the world.” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 9, p. 150, 1909). In the context of the final crisis, this compassionate service is a powerful rebuke to the beast’s system. When the state, under dragon influence, moves to persecute and marginalize Sabbath-keepers, our prior, visible record of selfless love for our communities will be a confounding testimony. It demonstrates that we are not rebels against society but ministers to its deepest needs, loyal to a higher law of love. This integrated life of obedience to God and love to neighbor is our preparation for the kingdom that cannot be shaken.

CONCLUSION

The echoes of ancient oaths on modern marble are more than ritual; they are a sounding board for the final conflict between two kingdoms. The choice before us is being framed with increasing clarity: the rainbow throne of God, where justice and mercy kiss in the law of liberty, or the dragon’s throne of the beast, where enforced conformity masquerades as unity. The presidential hand on the Bible is a ghost of a covenant that America has largely forgotten, a forgetfulness that paves the way for the dragon’s voice to speak through its laws. But for the people of God, understanding this trajectory is not a call to political activism but to prophetic witness and Christ-like service. Our mandate is to repair the breach by lifting high the immutable law of God and ministering with the compassionate love of Jesus. In doing so, we point beyond all falling kingdoms to the only oath that stands forever: the covenant of redemption sworn by the Father and sealed by the blood of the Lamb. The inauguration we anticipate is not of an earthly president, but of the King of kings. Until that day, let us be faithful watchmen and healing neighbors, our lives a testimony to the government whose foundation is love.

“And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites: And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may learn to fear the Lord his God, to keep all the words of this law and these statutes, to do them.” (Deuteronomy 17:18-19, KJV).

For deeper study on these foundational truths, visit our resource library at http://www.faithfundamentals.blog or join the ongoing conversation on our podcast at: https://rss.com/podcasts/the-lamb.

Table 1: The Transformation of the Beast (Rev 13:11)

FeatureThe “Lamb-Like” Phase (Rise)The “Dragon” Phase (End Time)Historical/Prophetic Marker
Origin“Coming up out of the earth” (Gradual, peaceful growth in new territory) 3“Speaks as a dragon” (Authoritarian, coercive) 31798 / End of 1260 Days
HornsTwo Horns: Republicanism (Civil Liberty) & Protestantism (Religious Liberty) 11Image to the Beast (Union of Church & State) 25The Constitution vs. Sunday Laws
VoiceSilence / Separation of Church & State (1st Amendment)Legislative enactments enforcing dogma 37National Reform Movement / Future Sunday Law
PowerAsylum for the oppressed 3“Causes that as many as would not worship… should be killed” (Rev 13:15)Persecution of the Remnant
MethodPersuasion, “Great Partnership” 17“Fire from heaven” / Miracles / Spiritualism 25Deceptive Signs & Wonders

Table 2: The “Great Partnership” vs. The “Image of the Beast”

ConceptThe “Great Partnership” (Sacks/Founders)The “Image of the Beast” (Prophecy)
Source of LawDivine Covenant & Natural Rights (Declaration of Independence)Majority Vote & Ecclesiastical Pressure (populism) 25
Role of Religion“Moral Sense” guiding society from within 17“Civil Law” enforced by the state from without 29
Treatment of DissentTolerance / Debate / “Lawful Disobedience” 9Economic Boycott (“No buy or sell”) / Death Decree
Justice DefinitionDefending the poor/needy (Jer 22, Isa 58) 39Enforcing dogmatic conformity (Sunday Sacredness)
Outcome“Wise and understanding nation” (Deut 4:6) 2“Abomination of Desolation” / National Ruin 6

SELF-REFLECTION

How can I, in my personal devotional life, delve deeper into these prophetic truths, allowing them to shape my character and priorities?

How can we adapt these complex themes to be understandable and relevant to diverse audiences, from seasoned church members to new seekers or those from different faith traditions, without compromising theological accuracy?

What are the most common misconceptions about these topics in my community, and how can I gently but effectively correct them using Scripture and the writings of Sr. White?

In what practical ways can our local congregations and individual members become more vibrant beacons of truth and hope, living out the reality of Christ’s soon return and God’s ultimate victory over evil?

If you have a prayer request, please leave it in the comments below. Prayer meetings are held on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. To join, enter your email address in the comments section.