BLINDNESS BLASTED: A CALL TO AWAKEN!

“FOR JUDGMENT I AM COME INTO THIS WORLD, THAT THEY WHICH SEE NOT MIGHT SEE; AND THAT THEY WHICH SEE MIGHT BE MADE BLIND.” (JOHN 9:39, KJV)

ABSTRACT

This article delves into the profound theme of spiritual blindness as illustrated in John 9, contrasting the miraculous healing of the man born blind with the Pharisees’ stubborn rejection of divine truth, while drawing from Scripture and the writings of Sr. White to highlight the necessity of humble acceptance of God’s light, the dangers of willful resistance, and the boundless nature of divine love that seeks to illuminate and transform every soul.

LIGHT LIBERATED!

Friends, fellow seekers, wayfarers on this dusty road of life! We’re diving deep today, not into some esoteric fluff, but into the raw, beating heart of a truth that can either liberate your soul or leave you stumbling in a self-imposed darkness. This isn’t just another theological exercise; it’s an urgent communiqué for every soul wrestling with the profound questions of faith, blindness, and the astonishing, sometimes terrifying, clarity that comes from a genuine encounter with the Divine. We’re peeling back the layers of a story as old as time, yet as fresh as your next breath – the story of how we, in our comfortable certainties, can become the most tragically blind. Our mission, should we choose to accept it, is to dissect the anatomy of spiritual blindness, to understand its insidious creep, and to arm ourselves with the divine light that alone can scatter the shadows. We’ll walk with a man whose eyes were opened, and with those who, claiming to see, saw nothing but the reflections of their own biases. This journey is packed with the kind of profound insights that demand we pause, reflect, and perhaps, radically reorient our spiritual compass. We’re talking about the kind of truth that doesn’t just inform but transforms, drawing from the inexhaustible wells of the King James Bible and the Spirit of Prophecy. So, buckle up. The path to true sight is often through the valley of acknowledging our own blindness. Unity depends on a vital connection with Christ. This reality finds support in “Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart” (Ephesians 4:18, KJV). Likewise, “Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway” (Romans 11:10, KJV). Sr. White elaborates, “The rejection of light and truth leaves men captives, the subjects of Satan’s deception. The greater the light they reject, the greater will be the power of deception and darkness which will come upon them” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1, p. 232, 1855). She also notes, “Every ray of light rejected, every warning despised or unheeded, every passion indulged, every transgression of the law of God, is a seed sown which yields its unfailing harvest. The Spirit of God, persistently resisted, is at last withdrawn from the sinner, and then there is left no power to control the evil passions of the soul, and no protection from the malice and enmity of Satan” (The Great Controversy, p. 591, 1911). But what happens when this blindness takes root in the hearts of religious leaders?

LIGHT’S UNIVERSE! BLINDNESS’ WORLD!

The human heart, a battleground of light and shadow, often recoils from the very illumination it desperately needs, a tragic paradox that forms the bedrock of spiritual blindness. Our memory verse, a stark pronouncement from the lips of Christ Himself, underscores the gravity of rejecting the Spirit’s overtures: “Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come” (Matthew 12:31–32, KJV). This isn’t about an arbitrary line drawn by a capricious God; rather, it describes a state of willful, persistent rejection where the heart becomes so calloused, so resistant to the Holy Spirit’s wooing, that repentance and forgiveness become experientially impossible for the individual. Ellen G. White clarifies the divine stance with piercing insight: “It is not God that blinds the eyes of men or hardens their hearts. He sends them light to correct their errors, and to lead them in safe paths; it is by the rejection of this light that the eyes are blinded and the heart hardened.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 322, 1898). Scriptures further illustrate this with “He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them” (John 12:40, KJV). And “For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them” (Acts 28:27, KJV). Sr. White adds, “Marvelous beyond expression is the blindness of the people of this generation. Thousands reject the word of God as unworthy of belief, and with eager confidence receive the deceptions of Satan” (The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 4, p. 416, 1884). She further warns, “The rejection of this light that the eyes are blinded and the heart hardened. Often the process is gradual, and almost imperceptible. Light comes to the soul through God’s word, through His servants, or by the direct agency of His Spirit; but when one ray of light is disregarded, there is a partial benumbing of the spiritual perceptions, and the second revealing of light is less clearly discerned. So the darkness increases, until it is night in the soul” (The Desire of Ages, p. 322, 1898). The tragedy, then, is not in God’s unwillingness to forgive, but in humanity’s stubborn refusal to see, a refusal that transforms divine light from a beacon of hope into an agent of judgment, not by its nature, but by our reception of it. Thus, spiritual blindness is not a passive affliction but an active, albeit often unconscious, choice to turn away from the very source of sight.

While the initial rejection of light might seem a small misstep, it sets a precedent, a dangerous trajectory towards profound spiritual insensibility. The prophet Isaiah lamented this very condition in ancient Israel, a people blessed with divine revelation yet often deaf to its call: “And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not. Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.” (Isaiah 6:9-10, KJV). This “fattening” of the heart and “shutting” of the eyes is not God’s malicious intent but the sorrowful divine acknowledgment of the consequence of persistent rebellion. Furthermore, the Apostle Paul speaks of a similar veiling, not from God’s side, but from the side of unbelief: “But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.” (2 Corinthians 4:3-4, KJV). The interplay is clear: divine light is offered, but the “god of this world”—Satan and the systems of thought he inspires—works tirelessly to obscure this light, preying on our inherent tendencies to resist uncomfortable truths. Sr. White emphasizes the cumulative effect of such choices: “Every ray of light rejected leaves the soul in deeper darkness, more alienated from God, and more firmly entrenched in a position of resistance.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, p. 133, 1885). And again, she warns, “Men may close their eyes to the light, they may seek to shut it out; but while it is light still, they are accountable for its rejection.” (The Spirit of Prophecy, Vol. 2, p. 255, 1877). Passages from Scripture confirm this through “And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient” (Romans 1:28, KJV). And “For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved” (John 3:20, KJV). Sr. White elaborates, “All who saw the light of the first and second angels’ messages and rejected that light, were left in darkness. And those who accepted it and received the Holy Spirit which attended the proclamation of the message from heaven, and who afterward renounced their faith and pronounced their experience a delusion, thereby rejected the Spirit of God, and it no longer pleaded with them” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 52, 1958). She also states, “They had “put darkness for light, and light for darkness,” until the light which was in them became darkness; and how great was that darkness!” (The Great Controversy, p. 377, 1911). Therefore, the journey into spiritual blindness is paved with rejected opportunities for illumination, each refusal making the next easier, until the soul finds itself in a profound, self-inflicted night. But how did this blindness manifest in the reaction of the Pharisees to a clear miracle?

PHARISEES’ FURY! MIRACLE MALICE!

The Pharisees’ reaction to the healing of the man born blind serves as a stark case study in willful spiritual blindness, where established religious authority, threatened by a power it could not control, sought to extinguish the light of truth rather than embrace it. Upon summoning the man whose sight Jesus had restored for a second time, their agenda was not investigation but intimidation, aiming to force a recantation or a discrediting of Christ. John 9:24 (KJV) records their manipulative demand: “Then again called they the man that was blind, and said unto him, Give God the praise: we know that this man is a sinner.” Their tactic was insidious: to divorce the miracle from the miracle-worker, to acknowledge divine power in the abstract while condemning its concrete manifestation in Jesus. Sr. White pulls back the curtain on their motives: “The Pharisees saw that they were giving publicity to the work done by Jesus. They could not deny the miracle. The blind man was filled with joy and gratitude; he beheld the wondrous things of nature, and was filled with delight at the beauty of earth and sky. He freely related his experience, and again they tried to silence him, saying, ‘Give God the praise: we know that this Man is a sinner.’ That is, Do not say again that this Man gave you sight; it is God who has done this.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 473, 1898). This desperate attempt to control the narrative, to fit an undeniable act of God into their prejudiced theological framework, reveals not piety, but a profound fear of the truth Jesus embodied. Their demand to “Give God the praise” was a smokescreen for their own refusal to see God at work through the One they labeled a sinner, a classic maneuver of those who prefer the darkness of their own understanding to the brilliant, unsettling light of divine revelation. This refusal aligns with “But unto the wicked God saith, What hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth? Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my words behind thee” (Psalm 50:16-17, KJV). And “This is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil” (John 3:19, KJV). Sr. White observes, “The manifestation of divine power that had given to the blind man both natural and spiritual sight had left the Pharisees in yet deeper darkness” (The Desire of Ages, p. 475, 1898). She continues, “If God had made it impossible for you to see the truth, your ignorance would involve no guilt. ‘But now ye say, We see.’ You believe yourselves able to see, and reject the means through which alone you could receive sight. To all who realized their need, Christ came with infinite help. But the Pharisees would confess no need; they refused to come to Christ, and hence they were left in blindness—a blindness for which they were themselves guilty. Jesus said, ‘Your sin remaineth’” (The Desire of Ages, p. 475, 1898).

In the face of such entrenched opposition, the healed man, armed with the undeniable reality of his own experience, presented an argument so simple yet so profound that it cut through their theological contortions. John 9:25 (KJV) captures his powerful testimony: “He answered and said, Whether he be a sinner or no, I know not: one thing I know, that, whereas I was blind, now I see.” This irrefutable statement, grounded in personal transformation, became a beacon of truth that their sophisticated arguments could not extinguish. It was a direct challenge to their authority, not through theological debate, but through the raw power of a changed life. This echoes the sentiment found in Job 42:5 (KJV): “I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee.” The transition from hearsay to direct experience is transformative and unshakeable. Similarly, David’s confidence in God was rooted in experiential knowledge: “O taste and see that the LORD is good: blessed is the man that trusteth in him.” (Psalm 34:8, KJV). The healed man had “tasted” and “seen,” and no amount of Pharisaical pressure could undo that reality. Sr. White comments on the power of such direct testimony: “The most eloquent preacher cannot impress hearts as can a humble, devoted follower of Christ, whose life of self-denial and consecration tells a more convincing story than can be told from the pulpit.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 4, p. 553, 1881). Furthermore, she states, “The evidence of a changed life is the most powerful argument in favor of the gospel.” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 470, 1905). Scriptures further confirm this with “And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death” (Revelation 12:11, KJV). And “But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear” (1 Peter 3:15, KJV). Sr. White highlights, “The most hopeless men are those who are satisfied with their own condition, and feel no need of improvement” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 3, p. 353, 1875). She also affirms, “The evidence of a changed life is the most powerful argument in favor of the gospel” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 470, 1905). Thus, the healed man’s simple declaration, “now I see,” became a divine counter-narrative, exposing the intellectual bankruptcy of those who, claiming to possess all spiritual knowledge, were blind to the living God in their midst. But what intensified the Pharisees’ interrogation in the face of this unyielding witness?

UNYIELDING WITNESS! INQUISITORS UNRELENT!

The Pharisees, far from being swayed by the healed man’s straightforward testimony, pressed their interrogation with renewed intensity, their questions betraying not a desire for truth, but a desperate attempt to find a flaw in the miracle or the man. John 9:26 (KJV) reveals their repetitive and ultimately futile line of questioning: “Then said they to him again, What did he to thee? how opened he thine eyes?” Their aim was clear: to confuse, to intimidate, to force a contradiction that would allow them to dismiss the entire event as a deception or a misinterpretation. Sr. White illuminates their dark strategy: “[The Pharisees] questioned again, ‘What did He to thee? how opened He thine eyes?’ With many words they tried to confuse him, so that he might think himself deluded. Satan and his evil angels were on the side of the Pharisees, and united their energies and subtlety with man’s reasoning in order to counteract the influence of Christ. They blunted the convictions that were deepening in many minds.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 473, 1898). This unholy alliance between human prejudice and demonic influence sought to create a fog of doubt, obscuring the clear light of the miracle. It’s a timeless tactic: when the evidence is undeniable, attack the witness or sow seeds of confusion to prevent the truth from taking root. Their repeated questioning was not a search for clarity but an exercise in obfuscation. This tactic mirrors “For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit” (Romans 8:5, KJV). And “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Corinthians 2:14, KJV). Sr. White reveals, “The Pharisees did not realize that they had to deal with any other than the uneducated man who had been born blind; they knew not Him with whom they were in controversy. Divine light shone into the chambers of the blind man’s soul. As these hypocrites tried to make him disbelieve, God helped him to show, by the vigor and pointedness of his replies, that he was not to be ensnared” (The Desire of Ages, p. 474, 1898). She also describes, “Satan and his evil angels were on the side of the Pharisees, and united their energies and subtlety with man’s reasoning in order to counteract the influence of Christ. They blunted the convictions that were deepening in many minds” (The Desire of Ages, p. 473, 1898).

Yet, in this crucible of pressure, the formerly blind man, now a beacon of newfound sight and Spirit-endowed courage, turned their own tactics against them with an almost audacious clarity. His response, recorded in John 9:27 (KJV), was both a rebuke and a challenge: “He answered them, I have told you already, and ye did not hear: wherefore would ye hear it again? will ye also be his disciples?” This was not the answer of an intimidated man, but of one emboldened by a divine presence. Sr. White assures us of this unseen support: “Angels of God were also on the ground to strengthen the man who had had his sight restored. The Pharisees did not realize that they had to deal with any other than the uneducated man who had been born blind; they knew not Him with whom they were in controversy. Divine light shone into the chambers of the blind man’s soul. As these hypocrites tried to make him disbelieve, God helped him to show, by the vigor and pointedness of his replies, that he was not to be ensnared.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 474, 1898). This divine empowerment is promised to all who stand for truth, as Jesus Himself declared in Luke 12:11, 12 (KJV): “And when they bring you unto the synagogues, and unto magistrates, and powers, take ye no thought how or what thing ye shall answer, or what ye shall say: For the Holy Ghost shall teach you in the same hour what ye ought to say.” The man’s bold question, “will ye also be his disciples?” cut to the heart of their hypocrisy, exposing their resistance not as intellectual skepticism, but as a willful refusal to follow the light. This boldness reflects “The LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? the LORD is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?” (Psalm 27:1, KJV). And “For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind” (2 Timothy 1:7, KJV). Sr. White encourages, “Now, with your Bibles you want to go before God, open them before God, and plead with God. You want your understanding quickened; you want to know that you know the real principles of the truth, and then when you meet with opponents you will not have to meet them in your own strength. The angel of God will stand right by your side to help you in answering every question that may be asked you. But at the same time Satan will stand right by your opponents to stir them up to say things hard for you to bear, in order to provoke you to speak unadvisedly; but let your conversation be such that Satan can take no advantage of your words” (Sermons and Talks, Vol. 1, p. 259, 1990). She further states, “Those who are called to stand for the truth will be opposed. They will be misrepresented. Satan will bring reproach upon all who identify themselves with Christ” (The Upward Look, p. 260, 1982).

This promise of divine aid in moments of trial is a cornerstone of faith, assuring us that we never stand alone when defending God’s truth. The prophet Jeremiah experienced this divine backing when facing immense opposition: “Be not afraid of their faces: for I am with thee to deliver thee, saith the LORD.” (Jeremiah 1:8, KJV). Similarly, the apostle Paul, reflecting on his trials, testified to God’s sustaining presence: “Notwithstanding the Lord stood with me, and strengthened me; that by me the preaching might be fully known, and that all the Gentiles might hear: and I was delivered out of the mouth of the lion.” (2 Timothy 4:17, KJV). Sr. White powerfully affirms this divine partnership: “Now, with your Bibles you want to go before God, open them before God, and plead with God. You want your understanding quickened; you want to know that you know the real principles of the truth, and then when you meet with opponents you will not have to meet them in your own strength. The angel of God will stand right by your side to help you in answering every question that may be asked you. But at the same time Satan will stand right by your opponents to stir them up to say things hard for you to bear, in order to provoke you to speak unadvisedly; but let your conversation be such that Satan can take no advantage of your words.” (Sermons and Talks, Vol. 1, p. 259, 1990). And further, “Those who are called to stand for the truth will be opposed. They will be misrepresented. Satan will bring reproach upon all who identify themselves with Christ.” (The Upward Look, p. 260, 1982). Yet, in the face of such orchestrated opposition, the assurance remains: the Spirit of God equips, empowers, and provides the very words needed, turning moments of potential defeat into powerful testimonies of divine faithfulness. We, like the man healed of blindness, can face our inquisitors with holy boldness, knowing that the Advocate stands beside us. Scriptures further illustrate this with “Fear not: for I am with thee: I will bring thy seed from the east, and gather thee from the west” (Isaiah 43:5, KJV). And “When thou passest through the waters, I will be with thee; and through the rivers, they shall not overflow thee: when thou walkest through the fire, thou shalt not be burned; neither shall the flame kindle upon thee” (Isaiah 43:2, KJV). Sr. White assures, “The angel of God will stand right by your side to help you in answering every question that may be asked you” (Sermons and Talks, Vol. 1, p. 259, 1990). She also emphasizes, “Opposition is the lot of all whom God employs to present truths specially applicable to their time. There was a present truth in the days of Luther—a truth at that time of special importance; there is a present truth for the church today” (The Great Controversy, p. 144, 1911). But how did the Pharisees resort to personal attacks when their arguments failed?

BEACON BRAVERY! BIGOTRY SEA!

When their attempts to deceive and intimidate the restored man failed, the Pharisees resorted to a tactic common among those whose arguments have crumbled: ad hominem attacks and appeals to their own established, yet flawed, authority. John 9:28, 29 (KJV) reveals their contemptuous dismissal: “Then they reviled him, and said, Thou art his disciple; but we are Moses’ disciples. We know that God spake unto Moses: as for this fellow, we know not from whence he is.” By belittling him as a mere “disciple” of Jesus and contrasting this with their esteemed lineage as “Moses’ disciples,” they sought to invalidate his experience and reaffirm their own spiritual superiority. This arrogant assertion of knowing God’s ways through Moses while professing ignorance about Christ, the very fulfillment of Mosaic prophecy, is a hallmark of willful blindness. The Apostle Paul addressed this kind of “wisdom” in 1 Corinthians 1:18, 19 (KJV): “For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.” And further, in 1 Corinthians 1:26–28 (KJV): “For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called: But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:”. Sr. White comments on this recurring pattern: “For His church in every generation God has a special truth and a special work. The truth that is hid from the worldly wise and prudent is revealed to the childlike and humble. It calls for self-sacrifice. It has battles to fight and victories to win. At the outset its advocates are few. By the great men of the world and by a world-conforming church, they are opposed and despised. . . . The great leaders of religious thought in this generation sound the praises and build the monuments of those who planted the seed of truth centuries ago. Do not many turn from this work to trample down the growth springing from the same seed today? The old cry is repeated, ‘We know that God spake unto Moses; as for this fellow [Christ in the messenger He sends], we know not from whence he is.’ John 9:29. As in earlier ages, the special truths for this time are found, not with the ecclesiastical authorities, but with men and women who are not too learned or too wise to believe the word of God.” (Christ’s Object Lessons, pp. 78-79, 1900). Their appeal to tradition became a wall against present truth, a tragic irony where reverence for past prophets blinded them to the Prophet present among them. This irony is echoed in “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools” (Romans 1:22, KJV). And “Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?” (1 Corinthians 1:20, KJV). Sr. White observes, “The Pharisees saw that they were giving publicity to the work done by Jesus. They could not deny the miracle” (The Desire of Ages, p. 473, 1898). She also notes, “The blind man was filled with joy and gratitude; he beheld the wondrous things of nature, and was filled with delight at the beauty of earth and sky. He freely related his experience, and again they tried to silence him” (The Desire of Ages, p. 473, 1898).

The sincere, unembellished testimony of the healed man, however, stands as a timeless example of courage and clarity in the face of such intellectual and spiritual snobbery. His logic, born of experience and illuminated by divine grace, dismantled their prejudiced assertions. John 9:30–33 (KJV) records his powerful rebuttal: “The man answered and said unto them, Why herein is a marvellous thing, that ye know not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes. Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. Since the world began was it not heard that any man opened the eyes of one that was born blind. If this man were not of God, he could do nothing.” This simple, yet profound, reasoning exposed the inconsistency of the Pharisees’ position: how could a “sinner,” as they labeled Jesus, perform such an unprecedented miracle, one that bore all the hallmarks of divine power? This echoes the unwavering stance of Peter and John before the same council, as recorded in Acts 4:19, 20 (KJV): “But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.” The conviction born of a genuine encounter with God’s power cannot be silenced by human threats or traditions. Consider also the words of Psalm 119:46 (KJV): “I will speak of thy testimonies also before kings, and will not be ashamed.” And the prophet Micah’s resolve: “Therefore I will look unto the LORD; I will wait for the God of my salvation: my God will hear me.” (Micah 7:7, KJV). Sr. White urges a similar boldness in proclaiming truth today: “In all modesty, in the spirit of grace, and in the love of God we are to point men to the fact that the Lord God is the Creator of the heavens and the earth, and that the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord. In the name of the Lord we are to go forward, unfurling His banner, advocating His word. When the authorities command us not to do this work, when they forbid us to proclaim the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus, then it will be necessary for us to say as did the apostles: ‘Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard.’ Acts 4:19, 20.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 6, p. 395, 1900). Furthermore, she encourages: “Let the truth be presented with divine tact, with love, with tenderness, and the victory will be gained.” (Evangelism, p. 636, 1946). The healed man’s testimony, like that of the apostles, was not an academic argument but a declaration of experienced reality, a powerful witness to the God who hears and acts on behalf of those who worship Him in spirit and truth. Scriptures further confirm this with “Let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged” (Romans 3:4, KJV). And “We having the same spirit of faith, according as it is written, I believed, and therefore have I spoken; we also believe, and therefore speak” (2 Corinthians 4:13, KJV). Sr. White states, “The man had met his inquisitors on their own ground. His reasoning was unanswerable. The Pharisees were astonished, and they held their peace—spellbound before his pointed, determined words” (The Desire of Ages, p. 474, 1898). She also adds, “For a few moments there was silence. Then the frowning priests and rabbis gathered about them their robes, as though they feared contamination from contact with him; they shook off the dust from their feet, and hurled denunciations against him” (The Desire of Ages, p. 474, 1898). But what was the ultimate response of the Pharisees when cornered by logic and miracle?

IRON FIST INTOLERANCE! CHRIST CATCHES!

The Pharisees, cornered by unanswerable logic and an undeniable miracle, reacted with the fury of those whose authority and worldview have been irrevocably challenged, resorting to the ultimate act of ecclesiastical power: excommunication. Their unwillingness to accept the evidence culminated in the casting out of the very man who was a living testament to God’s power. John 9:34 (KJV) records their indignant and self-righteous condemnation: “They answered and said unto him, Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us? And they cast him out.” This act was not merely a disciplinary measure; it was a violent rejection of the light he represented, a desperate attempt to maintain their control by silencing a voice that spoke of a power greater than their own. Sr. White vividly describes the scene: “The man had met his inquisitors on their own ground. His reasoning was unanswerable. The Pharisees were astonished, and they held their peace—spellbound before his pointed, determined words. For a few moments there was silence. Then the frowning priests and rabbis gathered about them their robes, as though they feared contamination from contact with him; they shook off the dust from their feet, and hurled denunciations against him—‘Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach us?’ And they excommunicated him.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 474, 1898). Their action, born of anger and wounded pride, demonstrated the dark depths of hearts hardened against the truth, preferring the familiar shadows of their traditions to the brilliant, liberating light of Christ. This hardening is reflected in “Therefore they could not believe, because that Esaias said again” (John 12:39, KJV). And “In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them” (2 Corinthians 4:4, KJV). Sr. White explains, “Opposition is the lot of all whom God employs to present truths specially applicable to their time. There was a present truth in the days of Luther—a truth at that time of special importance; there is a present truth for the church today. . . . Those who present the truth for this time should not expect to be received with greater favor than were earlier reformers. The great controversy between truth and error, between Christ and Satan, is to increase in intensity to the close of this world’s history” (The Great Controversy, p. 144, 1911). She also warns, “[Wycliffe observed,] no man can be truly excommunicated unless he has first brought upon himself the condemnation of God” (The Great Controversy, p. 95, 1911).

In stark and beautiful contrast to the Pharisees’ punitive rejection, Jesus sought out the excommunicated man, offering not condemnation but compassion, not exclusion but inclusion into the true spiritual fellowship. John 9:35–38 (KJV) narrates this tender encounter: “Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God? He answered and said, Who is he, Lord, that I might believe on him? And Jesus said unto him, Thou hast both seen him, and it is he that talketh with thee. And he said, Lord, I believe. And he worshipped him.” This moment is a profound illustration of divine grace seeking the outcast, a powerful counter-narrative to the harsh judgment of human institutions. Sr. White captures the significance of this acceptance: “The man cast himself at the Saviour’s feet in worship. Not only had his natural sight been restored, but the eyes of his understanding had been opened. Christ had been revealed to his soul, and he received Him as the Sent of God.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 475, 1898). Where the Pharisees saw a sinner to be expelled, Jesus saw a soul ready for deeper revelation and fellowship. This act underscores a critical truth: human condemnation does not equate to divine condemnation, and earthly exclusion can often lead to heavenly inclusion. The Lord is a refuge, as Psalm 9:9 (KJV) states: “The LORD also will be a refuge for the oppressed, a refuge in times of trouble.” And He promises in Isaiah 41:10 (KJV): “Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.” Sr. White adds, “Christ never turned away one repentant soul, however great his guilt.” (Steps to Christ, p. 55, 1892). And, “The Lord sees not as man sees; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 451, 1890). Jesus’ reception of the man was a divine affirmation of his worth and a quiet rebuke to the blind leaders who had cast him out. Passages from Scripture confirm this with “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28, KJV). And “Him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out” (John 6:37, KJV). Sr. White states, “To all who realized their need, Christ came with infinite help” (The Desire of Ages, p. 475, 1898). She further emphasizes, “Christ had come to open the blind eyes, to give light to them that sit in darkness. He had declared Himself to be the light of the world, and the miracle just performed was in attestation of His mission” (The Desire of Ages, p. 475, 1898).

The distinction between casting out defiant rebels against God’s known will and the excommunication of souls who lovingly obey God by those who are themselves stubbornly blind to Christ is immense and critical. The former, as seen in warnings like 1 Kings 9:6–9 (KJV) regarding Israel’s potential apostasy – “But if ye shall at all turn from following me, ye or your children, and will not keep my commandments and my statutes which I have set before you, but go and serve other gods, and worship them: Then will I cut off Israel out of the land which I have given them; and this house, which I have hallowed for my name, will I cast out of my sight; and Israel shall be a proverb and a byword among all people: And at this house, which is high, every one that passeth by it shall be astonished, and shall hiss; and they shall say, Why hath the LORD done thus unto this land, and to this house? And they shall answer, Because they forsook the LORD their God, who brought forth their fathers out of the land of Egypt, and have taken hold on other gods, and have worshipped them, and served them: therefore hath the LORD brought all this evil upon them.” – is a sorrowful divine necessity when all appeals are exhausted. The latter, however, is an act of spiritual tyranny, a tragic inversion where those in darkness attempt to extinguish the light. The memory verse, Matthew 12:31, 32 (KJV), speaks to the unpardonable sin of persistently rejecting the Holy Spirit’s testimony, a state the Pharisees were perilously approaching. Psalm 11:3 (KJV) asks a poignant question relevant here: “If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?” When religious leaders, the supposed guardians of truth, become its persecutors, the very foundations of spiritual order seem to crumble. quoting Wycliffe, notes a profound truth: “[Wycliffe observed,] no man can be truly excommunicated unless he has first brought upon himself the condemnation of God.” (The Great Controversy, p. 95, 1911). Furthermore, she states: “Opposition is the lot of all whom God employs to present truths specially applicable to their time. There was a present truth in the days of Luther—a truth at that time of special importance; there is a present truth for the church today. . . . Those who present the truth for this time should not expect to be received with greater favor than were earlier reformers. The great controversy between truth and error, between Christ and Satan, is to increase in intensity to the close of this world’s history.” (The Great Controversy, p. 144, 1911). Thus, the excommunication of the healed man was not a sign of his sin, but a badge of honor, marking him as one who stood for Christ against the blind fury of a compromised religious system. Scriptures further illustrate this with “Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake” (Matthew 5:11, KJV). And “Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution” (2 Timothy 3:12, KJV). Sr. White affirms, “Henceforth the contrast between truth and error would be more clearly seen, as they should take the field in open warfare. Never from that day would Rome be at ease” (The Great Controversy, p. 646, 1911). She also states, “The great controversy between truth and error, between light and darkness, between the power of God and the attempted usurpations of the enemy of all righteousness, is the one great spectacle which it is given to the inhabitants of other worlds to watch with absorbing interest” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 78, 1890). But how did Jesus articulate the dual effect of His presence as light in the world?

DIVIDING LIGHT! ILLUMINATION INDICTMENT!

Jesus, ever aware of the dual effect of His presence and words, articulated the profound truth that His coming into the world was for judgment – a judgment not of arbitrary condemnation, but of revelation and separation based on one’s response to the light. John 9:39 (KJV) records His solemn declaration: “And Jesus said, For judgment I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.” This statement encapsulates the divine paradox: the same light that brings sight to the humble and seeking (those who acknowledge they “see not”) becomes a source of deeper blindness to the proud and self-sufficient (those who confidently claim “we see”). Sr. White elaborates on this critical theme: “A group of Pharisees had gathered near, and the sight of them brought to the mind of Jesus the contrast ever manifest in the effect of His words and works. . . . Christ had come to open the blind eyes, to give light to them that sit in darkness. He had declared Himself to be the light of the world, and the miracle just performed was in attestation of His mission. The people who beheld the Saviour at His advent were favored with a fuller manifestation of the divine presence than the world had ever enjoyed before. The knowledge of God was revealed more perfectly. But in this very revelation, judgment was passing upon men. Their character was tested, their destiny determined.” (The Desire of Ages, p. 475, 1898). Christ’s mission was inherently one of salvation, yet the reception of that salvation, or its rejection, inevitably resulted in a judgment, a clear demarcation between those who embraced the light and those who retreated from it. The light itself doesn’t change; it’s our reaction to it that determines whether it illuminates or indicts. This paradox is captured in “The light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not” (John 1:5, KJV). And “If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!” (Matthew 6:23, KJV). Sr. White explains, “They had “put darkness for light, and light for darkness,” until the light which was in them became darkness; and how great was that darkness!” (The Great Controversy, p. 377, 1911). She also notes, “Disguised as an angel of light, he spreads his nets where least suspected. If men would but study the Book of God with earnest prayer that they might understand it, they would not be left in darkness to receive false doctrines” (Darkness Before Dawn, p. 10, 1997).

The Pharisees, overhearing Christ’s profound statement about sight and blindness, immediately took offense, their question revealing their self-righteous indignation and tragic lack of self-awareness. John 9:40 (KJV) captures their defensive reaction: “And some of the Pharisees which were with him heard these words, and said unto him, Are we blind also?” Their question was rhetorical, dripping with sarcasm, for they were utterly convinced of their spiritual perspicacity. Jesus’ response, however, stripped away their pretense, laying bare the culpability of their willful blindness. As recorded in John 9:41 (KJV): “Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth.” He wasn’t speaking of physical blindness, but of a spiritual blindness far more damning because it was accompanied by the arrogant claim of sight. Had they acknowledged their spiritual need, their “blindness,” they would have been in a position to receive healing and forgiveness (“ye should have no sin” in that particular respect). But their proud assertion, “We see,” closed the door to the very help they desperately needed, thereby ensuring their sin “remaineth.” This principle is echoed in Proverbs 26:12 (KJV): “Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope of a fool than of him.” And Jesus warned in Luke 11:35 (KJV): “Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not darkness.” Sr. White drives home the point: “The manifestation of divine power that had given to the blind man both natural and spiritual sight had left the Pharisees in yet deeper darkness. . . . If God had made it impossible for you to see the truth, your ignorance would involve no guilt. ‘But now ye say, We see.’ You believe yourselves able to see, and reject the means through which alone you could receive sight. To all who realized their need, Christ came with infinite help. But the Pharisees would confess no need; they refused to come to Christ, and hence they were left in blindness—a blindness for which they were themselves guilty. Jesus said, ‘Your sin remaineth.’ ” (The Desire of Ages, pp. 475-476, 1898). And she further states, “The most hopeless men are those who are satisfied with their own condition, and feel no need of improvement.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 3, p. 353, 1875). Their claim to sight, in the face of overwhelming evidence of their spiritual deficiency, became the very chain that bound them to their sin. Scriptures further confirm this with “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Isaiah 5:20, KJV). And “The way of the wicked is as darkness: they know not at what they stumble” (Proverbs 4:19, KJV). Sr. White warns, “Doubt and unbelief are cherished by those who do not walk circumspectly. They have a painful consciousness that their life will not abide the test of the Spirit of God, whether they be believers or unbelievers” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 253, 1958). She also states, “When a person refuses the light, he necessarily puts himself in darkness; when he rejects truth, he inevitably forges the shackles of error about his own neck” (Daniel and The Revelation, p. 2940, 1897). But how does God’s unfailing love persist amidst our faltering sight?

UNFAILING LOVE! FALTERING SIGHT!

The entire narrative of the man born blind, juxtaposed with the tragic blindness of the Pharisees, is a profound testament to God’s relentless, pursuing love, a love that offers sight to all but forces it upon none. God’s love is not a passive sentiment but an active, seeking force that provides every opportunity for healing and enlightenment. The very act of sending Jesus, “the light of the world,” as He declared in John 8:12 (KJV), “Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life,” is the ultimate expression of this love, designed to dispel the darkness of sin and ignorance. God’s love is manifested in His patience, as He extends light and truth even to those who resist Him, as seen in His repeated interactions with the Pharisees, offering them chance after chance to recognize Him. The healing of the blind man itself is a direct act of compassionate love, restoring not only physical sight but also offering spiritual illumination. Even the stark warnings about spiritual blindness and the unpardonable sin are expressions of love, designed to awaken souls to their peril before it’s eternally too late, much like a loving parent warns a child straying too close to a precipice. The prophet Hosea beautifully captures this yearning love of God for His wayward people: “I drew them with cords of a man, with bands of love: and I was to them as they that take off the yoke on their jaws, and I laid meat unto them.” (Hosea 11:4, KJV). Sr. White encapsulates this divine characteristic with profound clarity: “Love, mercy, and compassion were in every look and gesture. Christ wept with those that wept, and rejoiced with those that rejoiced. He was moved with deepest pity for the distressed and suffering. He took little children in His arms and blessed them. His words were full of tenderness and love. He never needlessly spoke a word to give pain. He never met a tempted soul with harshness, but sought to inspire him with hope.” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 4, p. 136, 1881). Thus, the provision of light, the patient entreaty, the miraculous intervention, and even the solemn warnings are all facets of God’s multifaceted love, earnestly desiring that all should come to the light and live. This love is further illustrated by “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16, KJV). And “The LORD hath appeared of old unto me, saying, Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee” (Jeremiah 31:3, KJV). Sr. White affirms, “The beauty that clothes the earth is a token of God’s love. We may behold it in the everlasting hills, in the lofty trees, in the opening buds and the delicate flowers” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 117, 1890). She also states, “God’s love for His children during the period of their severest trial is as strong and tender as in the days of their sunniest prosperity; but it is needful for them to be placed in the furnace of fire; their earthliness must be consumed, that the image of Christ may be perfectly reflected” (The Great Controversy, p. 2769, 1911). But how does recognizing these truths shape our responsibility toward God?

GOD’S CALL! OUR RESPONSE!

Recognizing the profound truths about spiritual sight and blindness, and God’s loving offer of illumination, cultivates a heart of humble receptivity and active obedience to the light He graciously provides. This begins with a conscious, daily surrender of our own perceived wisdom and prejudices, acknowledging that, like the man born blind, we are utterly dependent on His divine intervention for true spiritual understanding. We must diligently seek His truth through prayerful study of His Word, asking the Holy Spirit to “open thou mine eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of thy law,” as the psalmist prayed in Psalm 119:18 (KJV). Our responsibility extends to cherishing every ray of light, however small, and acting upon it promptly, lest by neglect we contribute to our own spiritual callousing. This involves a commitment to self-examination, as urged in 2 Corinthians 13:5 (KJV): “Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?” Furthermore, we must actively resist the temptation to say “We see” when, in reality, our understanding is clouded or incomplete, choosing instead the path of lifelong learning and dependence on divine guidance. Sr. White powerfully articulates this duty: “It is our duty to God to preserve the perceptive faculties, that we may distinguish between the sacred and the common. We should be diligent students of the word of God, that we may understand His will, and obey it. We should guard against the first approach to sin; for if we allow ourselves to be led away from the path of rectitude, we shall become hardened in transgression.” (Counsels on Health, p. 106, 1914). Therefore, our responsibility is one of vigilant spiritual attentiveness, consistent obedience to revealed truth, and a perpetual seeking after more of God’s light, ensuring that our heart remains soft and responsive to His Spirit. This attentiveness is supported by “Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths” (Proverbs 3:5-6, KJV). And “Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path” (Psalm 119:105, KJV). Sr. White urges, “We are to be channels of light to the world, imparting to others the light we have received from the great Light-bearer. We are to be as cities set on a hill, that cannot be hid. Our words and our works are to be such as will lead men to glorify our Father which is in heaven” (Our High Calling, p. 279, 1961). She also emphasizes, “A person whose mind is quiet and satisfied in God is in the pathway to health” (My Life Today, p. 92, 1952). But how does understanding this compel us to approach our neighbor with compassion?

NEIGHBOR’S NEED! OUR DUTY!

Understanding the pervasive nature of spiritual blindness and the transformative power of divine light compels us to approach our neighbor with profound compassion, patience, and a commitment to gently share the truth we have received. Our responsibility is not to condemn those who walk in darkness, for we too were once blind, but rather to be a conduit of the light of Christ, reflecting His love and truth in our words and actions. This means we must strive to embody the message we proclaim, allowing our life to be a testament to the reality that “whereas I was blind, now I see.” We must be willing to meet people where they are, as Jesus did, engaging with their questions and doubts without arrogance, always pointing them toward the Source of all light. This involves speaking the truth in love, as admonished in Ephesians 4:15 (KJV), “But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ.” It also means recognizing that, just as angels ministered to the healed man, divine agencies are at work, and our role is to cooperate with them, not to force conviction, which is the work of the Holy Spirit. We must avoid the Pharisaical trap of intellectual pride, remembering that true wisdom is demonstrated by a gentle and understanding spirit. The Apostle Paul gives clear instruction on this: “And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth.” (2 Timothy 2:24-25, KJV). Sr. White emphasizes the practical application of this responsibility: “We are to be channels of light to the world, imparting to others the light we have received from the great Light-bearer. We are to be as cities set on a hill, that cannot be hid. Our words and our works are to be such as will lead men to glorify our Father which is in heaven.” (Our High Calling, p. 279, 1961). Our responsibility, therefore, is to be a living invitation to the light, offering hope and guidance with the same grace and patience that God has extended to us, ever mindful that it is His light, not our own, that has the power to open blind eyes. This invitation aligns with “Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid” (Matthew 5:14, KJV). And “Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven” (Matthew 5:16, KJV). Sr. White instructs, “The servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth” (2 Timothy 2:24-25, KJV, quoted in context). She also states, “God wants men in His service, under His banner, to be strictly honest, unimpeachable in character, that their tongues shall not utter a semblance of untruth” (Child Guidance, p. 684, 1954).

LIGHT EMBRACED! NIGHT ESCAPED!

This journey through John 9 and the related counsels has been, we trust, more than an academic exercise. It’s a mirror reflecting our own spiritual condition, a call to vigilance against the insidious creep of self-satisfied blindness, and an invitation to bask continually in the illuminating, life-giving presence of Christ. The contrast between the healed man, whose physical and spiritual eyes were opened, and the Pharisees, who clung to their prestigious blindness, is a timeless drama re-enacted in countless hearts and institutions. For us, as the community across all spectrums of faith, the lessons are stark: humility is the prerequisite for sight; experience is a powerful, irrefutable testimony; divine aid is assured for those who stand for truth; and the rejection of light, especially under the guise of superior knowledge, leads to profound and culpable darkness. We must constantly ask ourselves: Are we truly seeking to see, or are we comfortable in our current perceptions, however limited? Are we willing to have our cherished notions shattered by a fresh revelation of God’s character and will? The path of the disciple is one of ever-increasing light, but only if we choose to walk towards its source. Let the words of the Apostle John resonate deep within us: “This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin.” (1 John 1:5-7, KJV). This is not just a promise; it’s a daily, moment-by-moment choice. This choice is reinforced by “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9, KJV). And “But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin” (1 John 1:7, KJV). Sr. White urges, “When a person refuses the light, he necessarily puts himself in darkness; when he rejects truth, he inevitably forges the shackles of error about his own neck” (Daniel and The Revelation, p. 2940, 1897). She also states, “Disguised as an angel of light, he spreads his nets where least suspected. If men would but study the Book of God with earnest prayer that they might understand it, they would not be left in darkness to receive false doctrines” (Darkness Before Dawn, p. 10, 1997).

In the end, the message is devastatingly simple yet profoundly challenging. The light has come into the world. Our response to that light determines everything. Will we, like the man healed at the Pool of Siloam, embrace it, testify to it, and worship the Source of it, even if it means being cast out by the established but spiritually blind powers? Or will we, like the Pharisees, cling to our traditions, our titles, our self-perceived righteousness, and in so doing, condemn ourselves to an ever-deepening darkness, all the while proclaiming, “We see”? The choice, as always, is ours. May we choose the humility that leads to sight, the courage that testifies to truth, and the love that reflects the heart of Him who is the Light of the world. May we never forget the gravity of the memory verse, understanding that the most tragic blindness is not the absence of physical sight, but the willful rejection of the spiritual light offered so freely by a loving God. Let us go forth from this study with renewed determination to be children of the light, walking in the light, and sharing that light with a world desperately in need of true vision. The path is clear, the invitation is open, and the consequences are eternal. This determination finds support in “Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness” (1 Thessalonians 5:5, KJV). And “Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light” (Ephesians 5:14, KJV). Sr. White encourages, “Ye are the light of the world” (Thoughts From the Mount of Blessing, p. 209, 1896). She also states, “The spiritual darkness that covers the earth is the result of a separation from God. Christ is the light and life of the world” (Manuscript Releases, vol. 12, p. 660, 1993).

If you have a prayer request, please leave it in the comments below. Prayer meetings are held on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. To join, enter your email address in the comments section.

PEOPLE OF THE BOOK

BLINDNESS BLASTED: A CALL TO AWAKEN!

Leave a comment Cancel reply