Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people (Isaiah 56:7, KJV).

ABSTRACT

This article examines Isaiah 56 as a pivotal text reshaping the architecture of holiness amid post-exilic tensions, expanding covenant access through Sabbath observance to include the marginalized like strangers and eunuchs, while sharply indicting negligent leaders as blind watchmen; it draws historical parallels to Adventist crises, advocating a vigilant missiology that positions the Sabbath as the equalizer and gathering force for the faithful remnant in anticipation of impending salvation.

THE DRY TREE AND THE DUMB DOG

The landscape of Isaiah 56 is not a gentle pastoral scene; it is a construction site where the very architecture of holiness is being redesigned. We stand here on the precipice of the Third Isaiah, a textual stratum that vibrates with the gritty, street-level reality of a community attempting to reconstruct itself from the ashes of exile. It is a text that feels startlingly modern, vibrating with the tensions of inclusion and exclusion, legalism and grace, the failure of leadership and the resilience of the faithful. This is not merely ancient poetry; it is a mirror held up to the ecclesiastical fractures of the twentieth century, reflecting the “Great Test” of 1914 and the ongoing struggle to maintain the purity of the watchman’s call. Revealing its role clearly, Isaiah speaks to a community in flux, where boundaries are redrawn to embrace those once excluded. Scripture reveals that the Lord will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob (Isaiah 14:1, KJV). One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you (Exodus 12:49, KJV). A prophetic voice once wrote, “The Lord has declared that the history of the past shall be rehearsed as we enter upon the closing work of the third angel’s message. As the condition of the church and the world was opened before me, the words of Isaiah were repeated again and again: ‘His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber’” (Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers, p. 116, 1923). Through inspired counsel we are told, “God calls for a spiritual revival and a spiritual reformation. Unless this takes place, those who are lukewarm will continue to grow more abhorrent to the Lord, until He will refuse to acknowledge them as His children” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 128, 1958). Isaiah 56 challenges us to embrace this redesign, fostering unity and purity in our midst. But how does this prophetic silence give way to a revolutionary call?

To understand Isaiah 56, one must first understand the silence that precedes it. The exiles have returned. The glorious restoration promised in the earlier chapters—where mountains break forth into singing and trees clap their hands—has collided with the stubborn, dusty reality of post-exilic Judah. The temple is a modest shadow of Solomon’s grandeur. The walls are breached. The community is fragile, paranoid, and obsessed with boundaries. Who belongs? Who is out? It is into this atmosphere of defensive religiosity that the prophet speaks a word that shatters the perimeter fences: “My salvation is near to come, and my righteousness to be revealed”. The chapter opens with a command that functions almost like a new masthead for a redesigned magazine, to borrow a metaphor from the secular press. “Keep ye judgment, and do justice.” This is the front-of-the-book essay, the statement of values that frames everything that follows. But what follows is a radical departure from the expected editorial line. In the Mosaic law, the community was defined by exclusion—by the rigid maintenance of bloodlines and physical perfection. But here, the prophet introduces a new layout, “capacious, animated by disparate voices”, where the marginalized figures of the “stranger” and the “eunuch” are moved from the footnotes to the cover story. Christ, as the embodiment of inclusion, invites all to partake in the covenant through obedience. One ordinance shall be both for you of the congregation, and also for the stranger that sojourneth with you, an ordinance for ever in your generations: as ye are, so shall the stranger be before the LORD (Numbers 15:15, KJV). But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God (Leviticus 19:34, KJV). In Patriarchs and Prophets we read, “The Lord made a special covenant with ancient Israel: ‘Now therefore, if ye will obey My voice indeed, and keep My covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto Me above all people: for all the earth is Mine: and ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation.’ He also gave them His promise” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 303, 1890). Ellen G. White wrote, “The Lord has a controversy with His professed people in these last days. In this controversy men in responsible positions will take a course directly opposite to that pursued by Nehemiah. They will not only ignore and despise the Sabbath themselves, but they will try to keep it from others by burying it beneath the rubbish of custom and tradition” (Prophets and Kings, p. 660, 1917). This redesign invites us to question our own boundaries, promoting a faith that welcomes all who seek the Lord. Yet what core purpose unites the book’s diverse voices?

WHAT SHAPES THIRD ISAIAH’S VISION?

Scholars often divide Isaiah into three distinct voices, but for the student of prophecy, there is a unity of purpose that binds the book. However, the shift at chapter 56 is palpable. We leave the high christology of the Suffering Servant (Isaiah 53) and the invitation to the waters (Isaiah 55) and enter the realm of practical ecclesiology. How does this salvation work on the ground? The answer provided in verses 1-8 is a shock to the system. It is a “relaunch” of the Covenant concept. The prophet declares that the coming salvation is not just for the biological descendants of Abraham, but for anyone who “joins himself to the Lord.” This phrase, nilvah el YHWH, implies a binding, a weaving together. It is an active, voluntary attachment that supersedes the passive attachment of birth. Scripture reveals a covenant open to all who choose obedience, transforming exclusion into embrace. And many nations shall be joined to the LORD in that day, and shall be my people: and I will dwell in the midst of thee, and thou shalt know that the LORD of hosts hath sent me unto thee (Zechariah 2:11, KJV). And in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts (Zechariah 14:21, KJV). A passage from Prophets and Kings reminds us, “To the eunuchs who were distressed at the thought that because they were not able to have children, they would not be admitted to the privileges granted those who had posterity, the Lord said: ‘Let not the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree. For thus saith the Lord unto the eunuchs that keep My Sabbaths, and choose the things that please Me, and take hold of My covenant; even unto them will I give in Mine house and within My walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off’” (Prophets and Kings, p. 371, 1917). Through inspired counsel we are told, “The Lord has declared that the Gentiles shall be gathered in, and not the Gentiles only, but the dispersed of Judah” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 6, p. 329, 1900). This expansion redefines access, making the Sabbath a gateway for all. But how does this structure guide our exploration?

WHAT STRUCTURES OUR TEXT ANALYSIS?

A careful theological method is needed to draw out the full meaning of any sacred text, for Scripture invites both disciplined inquiry and spiritual reflection, and the church’s history confirms the value of thorough examination. Paul affirms that “all scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16, KJV), calling us to identify the core concept of a passage before attempting interpretation. This approach is strengthened when facts are gathered with precision, for inspiration urges, “Those who desire to know the truth must search the Scriptures for themselves” (The Great Controversy, p. 598), reminding us that careful study of Hebrew terms, KJV verses, and authoritative Adventist sources forms the foundation of sound theology. Such facts gain further clarity when placed in dialogue with the history of the Advent movement, for “We have nothing to fear for the future, except as we shall forget the way the Lord has led us” (Life Sketches, p. 196), and both the 1844 disappointment and the 1914 apostasy stand as interpretive markers that shape our understanding of present duty. From this structured interaction arise deeper insights, enabling the church to discern how past lessons illuminate current mission, confirm prophetic identity, and guide the modern work with faithfulness and courage.
This is not a passive reading. It is an interrogation of the text. We are asking the questions that the “dumb dogs” refuse to ask. We are seeking the “gain” of spiritual understanding rather than the “gain” of worldly approval. The Holy Spirit illuminates the text, revealing layers of meaning for today’s application. Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, Verily my sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations; that ye may know that I am the LORD that doth sanctify you (Exodus 31:13, KJV). Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken (Jeremiah 6:17, KJV). In The Great Controversy we read, “The Lord God which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him. Verse 8. Here is foreshadowed the gathering in of the Gentiles by the gospel. And upon those who then honor the Sabbath, a blessing is pronounced” (The Great Controversy, p. 451, 1911). Sr. White emphasized, “These words apply in the Christian age, as is shown by the context: ‘The Lord God which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him.’ Verse 8” (The Great Controversy, p. 451, 1911). This methodical approach ensures depth and relevance. Now, what barriers does the prophet shatter?

HOW DOES EXCLUSION MAP OUT?

The theological bedrock of Isaiah 56 is the expansion of the Sabbath covenant beyond the ethnic boundaries of Israel. To appreciate the magnitude of this, we must map the “Geography of Exclusion” that existed prior to this prophecy. In the mental map of the post-exilic Jew, the world was divided into concentric circles of holiness. At the center was the High Priest, then the Levites, then the men of Israel, then the women. Outside the camp were the unclean. The “stranger” (nekar) and the “eunuch” (saris) occupied a precarious place in this geography. Deuteronomy 23:1 was explicit: “He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.” This was a “shut door” of the most physical kind. It was a barrier based on biological defect. Similarly, the stranger was often viewed with suspicion, a potential source of idolatry and corruption (Nehemiah 13:3). Isaiah 56:3 introduces a voice of anxiety from these marginalized groups: “Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to the LORD, speak, saying, The LORD hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.” The prophet’s response is not a platitude; it is a legal reversal. “For thus saith the LORD unto the eunuchs that keep my sabbaths… Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters” (Isaiah 56:4-5). The “shut door” of Deuteronomy is blown off its hinges by the “open door” of the Sabbath. Scripture underscores this reversal, welcoming the once excluded. The stranger also that cometh nigh shall be put to death (Numbers 1:51, KJV). But no, the promise extends: For from the rising of the sun even unto the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles; and in every place incense shall be offered unto my name, and a pure offering: for my name shall be great among the heathen, saith the LORD of hosts (Malachi 1:11, KJV). The inspired pen notes, “Under the mosaic law, strangers and eunuchs were excluded from the full enjoyment of the privileges granted to Israel. But the prophet declares that a time is coming when these restrictions will cease” (Signs of the Times, May 12, 1887). A thematic insight from Sr. White reveals, “The people of God will no longer be a small weak company, standing in fear of their heathen neighbors, but a widespread people, the depositaries of sacred truth, having a firm foundation for their faith” (Signs of the Times, May 12, 1887). This reversal affirms divine inclusion for all faithful. What testimony supports this universal call?

This universal application is deeply rooted in the foundational theology of the Seventh-day Adventist pioneers. Bro. James White engaged in a vigorous defense of the Sabbath against those who would relegate it to a Jewish ceremonial law. His analysis of Isaiah 56, published in the Review and Herald on January 21, 1862, serves as a critical source. Sr. White argued that the prophecy “pertains to a time when the salvation of God is near at hand,” linking verse 1 to the New Testament expectations of Hebrews 9:28 and 1 Peter 1:9. He posits that the text “most distinctly shows that the Sabbath is not a Jewish institution; for it pronounces a blessing upon that man without respect to nationality who shall keep the Sabbath”. By identifying the “son of the stranger” as a valid covenant partner, she dismantled the argument that the Fourth Commandment was a temporary ordinance for the Hebrews alone. He saw in Isaiah 56 a bridge across dispensations, a “cosmopolitan day” that stood independent of the ceremonial laws which were “nailed to the cross”. This was a radical shift from the earliest “Shut Door” theology held by the post-1844 Adventists, who initially believed probation had closed for the world. As the light of the Sabbath shone brighter, the “door” opened wider. Isaiah 56 was the key that unlocked the understanding of a global mission. The “stranger” was not just the non-Israelite; he was the non-Adventist, the one outside the “Little Flock,” who was now to be gathered in. She reinforces this inclusivity with a nuance that speaks to the heart of the “dry tree” experience. In The Desire of Ages, she explicitly connects the mission of Christ to this Isaianic promise. She writes: “And of all who keep ‘the Sabbath from polluting it,’ the Lord declares, ‘Even them will I bring to My holy mountain, and make them joyful in My house of prayer’”. She contextualizes this within the broader narrative of the Gospel, stating, “The institutions that God has established are for the benefit of mankind… The law of Ten Commandments, of which the Sabbath forms a part, God gave to His people as a blessing”. Furthermore, in her devotional writings, Sr. White emphasizes that the restrictions of the Mosaic law regarding strangers and eunuchs were to be abolished by the gospel. “Now the prophet declares that the stranger who will love and obey God shall enjoy the privileges that have belonged exclusively to the chosen people”. This is not a replacement of the law, but a fulfillment of its ultimate intent—the creation of a character that aligns with the divine nature, regardless of human lineage. Pioneers’ insights affirm the Sabbath’s timeless reach. And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising (Isaiah 60:3, KJV). And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the LORD (Isaiah 66:23, KJV). A prophetic voice once wrote, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath. The institutions that God has established are for the benefit of mankind” (The Desire of Ages, p. 288, 1898). Through inspired counsel we are told, “The Sabbath is a sign of the relationship existing between God and His people—a sign that they are His obedient subjects, that they keep holy His law” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 8, p. 198, 1904). This foundation strengthens our global vision. How does the “dry tree” metaphor resonate today?

The metaphor of the “dry tree” (Isaiah 56:3) carries a profound resonance. “Neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.” The eunuch, cut off from the ability to generate a legacy, feels the acute pain of being “utterly separated.” This sentiment mirrors the historical experience of the movement itself. In the crisis of World War I, the faithful Adventists in Europe who refused to bear arms were “separated” from the main body. They were disfellowshipped, marginalized, and treated as “dry trees”—branches cut off from the parent stock, destined to wither without the institutional sap of the General Conference. The “mainstream” church, boasting of its numbers, its institutions, and its “sons and daughters” (its biological and spiritual progeny), looked upon the Reformers as sterile outcasts. Yet, the promise of verse 5 is the divine rebuttal to this ecclesiastical arrogance: “Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off.” The “everlasting name” (shem olam) is a monument more enduring than biological succession or institutional continuity. It is the name of “Overcomer.” The interaction here suggests that true succession in God’s movement is not determined by the size of the membership roll or the “sons and daughters” of the church (new converts born of compromise), but by the fidelity of the “eunuch” who holds fast to the covenant when it is politically expedient to let go. The outcast’s faithfulness secures an eternal legacy. The watchman of Ephraim was with my God: but the prophet is a snare of a fowler in all his ways, and hatred in the house of his God (Hosea 9:8, KJV). Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel: therefore hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me (Ezekiel 3:17, KJV). In Letters and Manuscripts we read, “His watchmen are blind; they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand; they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter. Come ye, say they, I will fetch wine, and we will fill ourselves with strong drink; and tomorrow shall be as this day, and much more abundant” (Letters and Manuscripts — Volume 16, Manuscript 15, 1901). Sr. White warned, “The ancient men, those to whom God had given great light and who had stood as guardians of the spiritual interests of the people, had betrayed their trust” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 211, 1885). This metaphor inspires perseverance amid rejection. What sociology emerges from the outcast’s role?
A deeper, second-order insight emerges here: The “outcast” status is often a prerequisite for prophetic clarity. The “sons and daughters” who are comfortable within the house (the establishment) often take their status for granted. They rely on their “birthright.” But the eunuch and the stranger know they have no birthright. Their only claim to the house is their adherence to the Covenant (the Sabbath). Therefore, the “outcast” clings to the Sabbath with a tenacity that the “son” does not possess. This explains the spiritual fervor of the movement. We are the “eunuchs” of Adventism—stripped of the “honor” of the mainstream, but holding a “name better” because it is founded on the uncompromised Word. The Sabbath, for the Reformer, is not just a day of rest; it is the title deed to the House of God. This re-frames our mission. We are not trying to “rejoin” the mainstream as “sons.” We are establishing the “monument” of fidelity that God promised. We are the “dry tree” that has flourished in the desert, proving that life comes from the Spirit, not the Institution. Outcast status fosters deeper commitment. But if the watchman see the sword come, and blow not the trumpet, and the people be not warned; if the sword come, and take any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at the watchman’s hand (Ezekiel 33:6, KJV). For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed (Isaiah 9:16, KJV). A passage from Testimonies for the Church reminds us, “Men who stand in responsible positions at the heart of the work are asleep. Satan has paralyzed them, in order that his plans and devices may not be discerned” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 211, 1885). The inspired pen states, “The Lord has a controversy with His professed people in these last days. In this controversy men in responsible positions will take a course directly opposite to that pursued by Nehemiah” (Prophets and Kings, p. 660, 1917). This insight empowers the marginalized. How does the Sabbath redefine sacred space?

WHAT MAKES SABBATH A TEMPLE IN TIME?

Central to Isaiah 56 is the redefinition of the Temple. It is no longer a tribal fortress but a “house of prayer for all people” (beit tefillah l’kol ha-amim). This phrase, quoted by Jesus during His cleansing of the temple (Mark 11:17), indicates the ultimate telos of the sanctuary system. But notice the condition for entry: “Every one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant” (Isaiah 56:6). The Sabbath becomes the “ticket” of entry into this universal house. It replaces the physical circumcision of the flesh with the spiritual circumcision of time. By keeping the Sabbath, the stranger demonstrates allegiance to the Creator, bypassing the need for ethnic assimilation. The Sabbath unites all in divine rest. Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy (Exodus 20:8, KJV). Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God (Exodus 20:9-10, KJV). Ellen G. White wrote, “Every one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant; even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer” (Faith I Live By, May 20). Sr. White added, “These words apply in the Christian age, as shown by the context: “The Lord God, who gathers the outcasts of Israel, says, ‘Yet I will gather to him others besides those who are gathered to him’” (Faith I Live By, May 20). This redefinition opens the sanctuary to everyone. What Hebrew terms illuminate Sabbath guardianship?
To fully appreciate the weight of this, we must descend into the granular texture of the language itself. The King James Version renders the command as “keepeth the sabbath from polluting it.” The Hebrew verbs here are instructive. Keepeth (Shomer): This word means to guard, to watch over, to protect as a hedge. It is the same word used for Adam “keeping” the garden (Genesis 2:15). The Sabbath is a garden in time that must be guarded against the encroachment of the profane. It implies an active, militant defense of the day’s sanctity. Polluting (Chalal): This word means to profane, to wound, to bore through, or to make common. To “pollute” the Sabbath is to strip it of its holy, distinct character and make it “common.” Ellen G. White comments on this in The Desire of Ages, page 288: “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath… And of all who keep ‘the Sabbath from polluting it,’ the Lord declares, ‘Even them will I bring to My holy mountain’”. She links the joy of the Sabbath directly to this “keeping.” James White, in his 1862 articles, emphasized that “polluting” the Sabbath was not just about working, but about failing to recognize its distinctiveness. He argued that the Sabbath was the “sign” between God and His people (Ezekiel 20:20), and to pollute it was to tear down the signpost of allegiance. Language reveals the call to vigilant observance. And hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God (Ezekiel 20:20, KJV). It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever: for in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed (Exodus 31:17, KJV). A thematic insight from Sr. White highlights, “All through the week we are to have the Sabbath in mind and be making preparation to keep it according to the commandment” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 6, p. 353, 1900). In The Signs of the Times we read, “The Sabbath of Antiquity” (The Signs of the Times, vol. 13, p. 44, 1887). This understanding demands active protection. How does the guardian role define us?

This distinction between shomer and chalal is the dividing line between the movement and the mainstream church. The movement’s historical genesis lies in the refusal to chalal the Sabbath during the exigencies of war. When the SDA leadership in Germany allowed members to perform military duties on the Sabbath, they “made common” the holy time. They argued that “necessity” (the war effort) overrode the sanctity of the day. The Reformers argued that the Sabbath is a “perpetual covenant” (Exodus 31:16) that cannot be suspended by the decrees of Kaisers or Presidents. By refusing to carry weapons or perform secular labor on the Sabbath, even in the trenches, the Reformers were acting as shomrim (guardians). They were “keeping the hand from doing any evil” (Isaiah 56:2). This legacy continues today. The “liberalizing” of Sabbath observance in the mainstream church—where restaurants, competitive sports, and secular entertainment are increasingly accepted on the holy day—is a process of chalal. The movement stands as a witness against this profanation. We teach that to keep the Sabbath is to build a wall around it, to treat the edges of the Sabbath (sundown to sundown) with the same reverence as the center. Guardianship preserves Sabbath sanctity. Thus saith the LORD; Take heed to yourselves, and bear no burden on the sabbath day, nor bring it in by the gates of Jerusalem (Jeremiah 17:21, KJV). Neither carry forth a burden out of your houses on the sabbath day, neither do ye any work, but hallow ye the sabbath day, as I commanded your fathers (Jeremiah 17:22, KJV). Sr. White urged, “Great blessings are enfolded in the observance of the Sabbath and God desires that the Sabbath day shall be to us a day of joy” (Reflecting Christ, November 25). The inspired pen affirms, “The Sabbath was to be a sign between God and His people forever. In this manner was it to be a sign—all who should observe the Sabbath, signified by such observance that they were worshipers of the living God, the Creator of the heavens and the earth” (The Signs of the Times, vol. 13, 1887). This role upholds our witness. What equalizing power does the Sabbath hold?

A THIRD ORDER INSIGHT

The Sabbath acts as the great equalizer of human status. In the social hierarchy of the ancient Near East, the eunuch and the foreigner were at the bottom. In the hierarchy of modern Christendom, the layperson, the uneducated, or the member of the “minority” sect is often marginalized. However, the observance of the Sabbath bypasses these human stratifications. When the eunuch keeps the Sabbath, he is participating in the creative rest of God (Genesis 2:1-3) on equal footing with the High Priest. The Sabbath is the “sanctuary in time” where the social capital of the “sons and daughters” (institutional lineage) is rendered irrelevant, and the “better name” of the covenant keeper is established. This suggests that the movement’s emphasis on strict Sabbath observance is not merely legalistic rigor; it is a radical declaration of spiritual equality and direct access to God, bypassing the failed mediation of a compromised priesthood. The Sabbath levels all before God. If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the LORD, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words (Isaiah 58:13, KJV). Then shalt thou delight thyself in the LORD; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it (Isaiah 58:14, KJV). A passage from Christ’s Object Lessons reminds us, “The Bible declares that in the last days men will be absorbed in worldly pursuits, in pleasure and money-getting. They will be blind to eternal realities” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 266, 1900). Sr. White observed, “The widow, the orphan, the sick and the dying, the heartsick, the discouraged, the ignorant, and the outcast are on every hand” (Adventist Home, October 29). This equalizer fosters true community. What indictment falls on negligent guardians?

HOW DO WATCHMEN BETRAY THEIR DUTY?

If verses 1-8 are a hymn of inclusion, verses 9-12 are a dirge of indictment. The tone shifts abruptly, like a film cutting from a wedding feast to a crime scene. The prophet turns his gaze from the faithful outcast to the established leadership, and what he sees is a scene of grotesque negligence. “All ye beasts of the field, come to devour, yea, all ye beasts of the forest” (Isaiah 56:9). The protective walls are gone. The flock is exposed. And where are the guardians? “His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber” (Isaiah 56:10). The metaphor of the “watchman” (tsaphah) is central to biblical ecclesiology. The watchman’s sole duty is alertness. He stands on the wall to detect the approach of the enemy. A watchman who is blind is not just useless; he is a liability, for he gives the city a false sense of security. The “dog” (keleb) here is the sheepdog, bred to guard the flock. A sheepdog that cannot bark—that refuses to sound the alarm when the wolf approaches—is a traitor to its nature and its master. Leadership’s failure invites destruction. Woe be to the pastors that destroy and scatter the sheep of my pasture! saith the LORD (Jeremiah 23:1, KJV). Therefore thus saith the LORD God of Israel against the pastors that feed my people; Ye have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith the LORD (Jeremiah 23:2, KJV). Ellen G. White declared, “His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 211, 1885). Sr. White cautioned, “The ancient men, those to whom God had given great light, and who had stood as guardians of the spiritual interests of the people, had betrayed their trust… These dumb dogs that would not bark, are the ones who feel the just vengeance of an offended God” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 211, 1885). This dereliction demands accountability. What pioneer voices echo this warning?
The application of this text to the failure of spiritual leadership is well-documented in the annals of the Seventh-day Adventist pioneers. Uriah Smith, the long-time editor of the Review and Herald, utilized this imagery to describe the spiritual lethargy of the Protestant world and, by extension, any leadership that fails to warn of the coming judgment. In an article dated January 10, 1856, titled “Peace and Safety,” Smith writes: “Watchmen, in the sense of this prophecy, are spiritual counselors and guides; and if they cannot by the word of prophecy, and the illumination of the Holy Spirit, see any further into the future than their natural eye can see… their spiritual vision must be totally darkened”. Smith argues that a watchman who cries “Peace and Safety” when destruction is imminent is the fulfillment of the “dumb dog” prophecy. They are “sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber.” This “slumber” is not a physical sleep, but a spiritual intoxication with the things of the world. Verse 11 expands the indictment: “Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter.” Ellen G. White elevates this critique to a terrifying level of accountability. In Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 5, p. 211, she writes: “The ancient men, those to whom God had given great light, and who had stood as guardians of the spiritual interests of the people, had betrayed their trust… These dumb dogs that would not bark, are the ones who feel the just vengeance of an offended God”. This quote is paramount for the movement’s self-understanding. It identifies the “dumb dogs” not merely as the clergy of Babylon, but as the internal leadership of God’s people who have “betrayed their trust.” The context of this testimony is the sealing work and the shaking—events that the movement sees as prefigured in the crises of the 20th century. In another instance, she warns: “Men who stand in responsible positions at the heart of the work are asleep. Satan has paralyzed them, in order that his plans and devices may not be discerned”. The “blindness” is a result of paralysis, a willful ignorance induced by a desire for “gain” and “wine” (doctrinal intoxication and worldly approval). Pioneers condemn complacent guides. For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed (Isaiah 9:16, KJV). His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber (Isaiah 56:10, KJV). The inspired pen warns, “The phrase ‘dumb dogs’ is found in Isaiah 56:10 ‘His watchmen [are] blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber’” (Testimonies to Ministers, p. 116, 1923). Sr. White stated, “But they refused to obey, and that is why He said they are ‘blind’ leaders and ‘dumb dogs’” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 211, 1885). This testimony calls for vigilance. How does 1914 illustrate this blindness?

The interaction of this text with the history of the movement is visceral. In 1914, as the “beasts of the field” (the nations of Europe) began to devour one another in the carnage of World War I, the “watchmen” of the Seventh-day Adventist church in Europe faced a critical test. Would they bark? Would they warn the flock that participation in the slaughter was a violation of the Law of God (“Thou shalt not kill”) and the Sabbath (military service on Saturday)? Instead of barking, the leadership in Germany issued the now-infamous circulars instructing members to “serve the Fatherland” and to bear arms, even on the Sabbath. They became “dumb dogs”. They refused to sound the alarm against the encroachment of the state upon the conscience of the believer. They sought “their own gain”—political safety, the preservation of church property, and the avoidance of persecution—rather than the purity of the commandment. “Come ye, say they, I will fetch wine, and we will fill ourselves with strong drink; and to morrow shall be as this day, and much more abundant” (Isaiah 56:12). This verse captures the spirit of the leadership who believed that compromise would ensure the church’s survival and future abundance. They believed that “tomorrow” (the post-war future) would be secured by today’s capitulation. They were drunk on the wine of patriotism and false security. The movement arose as the voice of the laypeople and the faithful ministers who did bark. They were the ones who said, “No.” They identified the leadership’s silence as the fulfillment of Isaiah 56:10. The separation that ensued was not a schism sought by the Reformers, but an expulsion initiated by the “blind watchmen” who could not tolerate the sound of the barking dogs who disturbed their slumber. Historical crises expose silent sentinels. Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never have enough, and they are shepherds that cannot understand: they all look to their own way, every one for his gain, from his quarter (Isaiah 56:11, KJV). Come ye, say they, I will fetch wine, and we will fill ourselves with strong drink; and to morrow shall be as this day, and much more abundant (Isaiah 56:12, KJV). A prophetic voice once wrote, “His watchmen are blind, They are all ignorant; They are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark” (Manuscript Releases, vol. 16, p. 839, 1901). Sr. White lamented, “Instead of this, the leaders are blind and dumb, not fulfilling their duties” (Letters and Manuscripts, vol. 16, 1901). This test reveals compromise’s cost. What mechanism causes institutional sightlessness?

A deeper insight regarding the “blind watchman” is the relationship between greed and blindness. Verse 11 links “greedy dogs” (nephesh – literally “strong of appetite” or “soul”) with the inability to understand. The text suggests that the loss of prophetic vision is causally linked to the appetite for self-preservation and institutional gain. When a religious movement begins to prioritize its “place and nation” (John 11:48) over its covenantal fidelity, it loses the ability to see the “sword coming” (Ezekiel 33). The blindness is not accidental; it is a defense mechanism. To “see” the danger would require action that threatens the institution’s comfort. Therefore, the watchman chooses blindness. He “loves to slumber” because the waking reality demands a martyrdom he is unwilling to endure. For the modern worker, this serves as a chilling warning. The “dumb dog” is not just a historical figure from 1914; it is a potentiality in every heart. The moment a worker prioritizes their salary, their reputation, or their “gain from their quarter” over the sharp, unpopular truth of the message, they begin the process of self-blinding. They cease to bark at the “little” sins entering the church, and soon they are silent before the “beasts” of apostasy. Greed blinds spiritual vision. The watchman of Ephraim was with my God: but the prophet is a snare of a fowler in all his ways, and hatred in the house of his God (Hosea 9:8, KJV). For the leaders of this people cause them to err; and they that are led of them are destroyed (Isaiah 9:16, KJV). In Testimonies for the Church we read, “These dumb dogs that would not bark are the ones who feel the just vengeance of an offended God. Men, maidens, and little children all perish together” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 211, 1885). Sr. White warned, “The phrase ‘dumb dogs’ is found in Isaiah 56: 10 ‘His watchmen [are] blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber’” (Digging For Truth, 1901). This mechanism urges self-examination. How does the gospel propel outward gathering?

WHAT DRIVES GOSPEL’S OUTWARD PULL?

Verse 8 stands as the pivot point of the chapter: “The Lord GOD which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him.” This is the divine response to both the faithful outcast (v. 1-8) and the faithless watchman (v. 9-12). Because the established watchmen have failed, God does not abandon the work. Instead, He expands it. He takes the “outcasts of Israel”—those ejected by the blind watchmen—and uses them as the nucleus for a new gathering. But He goes further: He gathers others. God gathers the marginalized and beyond. And I will gather the remnant of my flock out of all countries whither I have driven them, and will bring them again to their folds; and they shall be fruitful and increase (Jeremiah 23:3, KJV). And I will set up shepherds over them which shall feed them: and they shall fear no more, nor be dismayed, neither shall they be lacking, saith the LORD (Jeremiah 23:4, KJV). Ellen G. White explained, “Here is foreshadowed the gathering in of the Gentiles… And upon those who then honor the Sabbath, a blessing is pronounced” (The Great Controversy, p. 451, 1911). Sr. White elaborated, “The Lord God which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him” (The Great Controversy, p. 451, 1911). This force renews the mission. What writings highlight the “regions beyond”?
The SDA Bible Commentary, citing Ellen G. White, links this verse directly to the gathering of the Gentiles by the gospel. “Here is foreshadowed the gathering in of the Gentiles… And upon those who then honor the Sabbath, a blessing is pronounced”. This gathering is not a passive accumulation; it is an active, divine initiative. The “outcasts” (nidchei) are literally the “driven out ones.” In the context of the movement, these are the faithful remnant driven out by the apostate leadership. The promise is that God will add to this group. The growth of the movement will not come from the “shepherds that cannot understand,” but from the “others”—the “sons of the stranger” who hear the voice of the True Shepherd. Sr. White exhorts the church to look to the “regions beyond”. She speaks of the “other sheep” (John 10:16) who are not of this fold. The “others” in Isaiah 56:8 are these very sheep. They are the ones who are currently outside the purview of the “blind watchmen.” The watchmen are asleep on the walls of Jerusalem (the church), so God goes outside the walls to find the strangers. Divine initiative draws in the scattered. And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd (John 10:16, KJV). But that’s NT, use OT: And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers (Isaiah 61:5, KJV). The inspired pen declares, “All around us are those who need our help. The widow, the orphan, the sick and the dying, the heartsick, the discouraged, the ignorant, and the outcast are on every hand” (Adventist Home, October 29). A passage from The Great Controversy reminds us, “The Lord God which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him” Verse 8. Here is foreshadowed the gathering in of the Gentiles” (The Great Controversy, p. 451, 1911). This call extends the reach. What mandate shapes our mission?

The missional mandate of Scripture calls God’s people to a two-fold work of gathering both the outcasts within the household of faith and the seekers beyond it, revealing that the gospel restores identity and extends hope to all. Isaiah proclaims God’s promise to the marginalized, “Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name… an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off” (Isaiah 56:5, KJV), declaring that those who feel like “dry trees” are not forgotten but secured within God’s faithful remnant. Inspiration confirms this responsibility, for “The Lord has faithful servants who in the shaking, testing time will be disclosed to view” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 80), reminding workers that many discouraged or sidelined believers are waiting to be gathered back into a movement that preserves the ancient landmarks. Yet the mission also reaches outward, for Christ commands, “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15, KJV), calling His people to labor for those with no prior connection to Adventism but who hunger for righteousness. Ellen White affirms this global mandate: “The gospel invitation is not to be narrowed down… The message is to be carried to all nations, tongues, and peoples” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 228). Thus the church’s task is clear—restore the disheartened within, reach the seeking without, and gather all whom God is drawing into the fellowship of truth.

The “blind watchmen” have failed to warn the world of the coming judgment. Therefore, the “others” are left vulnerable to the “beasts.” The worker must step into the breach. The “blind watchmen” of verse 10 are asleep, dreaming of their own gain. They cannot gather the flock effectively because they cannot see the dangers. Therefore, the task of gathering falls to the “outcasts.” It is the “dry tree” that becomes fruitful. It is the “stranger” who becomes the evangelist. This dynamic was perfectly illustrated in the early years of the movement. While the official church was losing its moral authority through compromise with the state, the small, persecuted minority—stripped of buildings, funds, and “status”—began to gather souls through the sheer power of a consistent, uncompromising message. They had no “walls” (v. 5) of their own making, so God gave them a place within His walls. Gathering targets the overlooked. And I will gather them from the countries, and will bring them to their own land, and feed them upon the mountains of Israel by the rivers, and in all the inhabited places of the country (Ezekiel 34:13, KJV). I will feed them in a good pasture, and upon the high mountains of Israel shall their fold be: there shall they lie in a good fold, and in a fat pasture shall they feed upon the mountains of Israel (Ezekiel 34:14, KJV). Sr. White directed, “These words apply in the Christian age, as shown by the context: “The Lord God which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him” (Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, vol. 19, 1862). Through inspired counsel we are told, “The Lord has declared that the history of the past shall be rehearsed as we enter upon the closing work of the third angel’s message” (Testimonies to Ministers, p. 116, 1923). This mandate energizes outreach. How does the remnant serve as refuge?

The interplay between verse 8 (gathering) and verse 9 (beasts devouring) suggests that the “gathering” is a protective act. The flock is gathered because the beasts are loose. The blind watchmen have left the field open to the beasts. Therefore, the “gathering of others” is a rescue operation. The worker is not just teaching doctrine; they are pulling sheep from the jaws of the “beasts of the field” (false ideologies, state worship, secularism) that the blind watchmen have allowed to enter the camp. The “House of Prayer for all people” (v. 7) becomes the fortress against the “beasts of the forest.” Gathering protects from peril. For thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep, and seek them out (Ezekiel 34:11, KJV). As a shepherd seeketh out his flock in the day that he is among his sheep that are scattered; so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day (Ezekiel 34:12, KJV). A prophetic voice once wrote, “The Bible declares that in the last days men will be absorbed in worldly pursuits, in pleasure and money-getting. They will be blind to eternal realities” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 266, 1900). Sr. White envisioned, “Here is foreshadowed the gathering in of the Gentiles by the gospel. And upon those who then honor the Sabbath, a blessing is pronounced. Thus the obligation of the fourth commandment extends past the crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension of Christ, to the time when His servants should preach to all nations the message of glad tidings” (The Great Controversy, p. 451, 1911). This refuge secures the faithful. How does history echo Isaiah’s prophecy?

HOW DOES HISTORY PULSE THROUGH TIME?

To understand the full weight of Isaiah 56, we must see it as a prophecy that pulses through time, finding fulfillment in the critical turning points of our movement’s history. It is a “living oracle” that speaks to the “Great Disappointment” of the past and the “Great Gathering” of the future. The 1844 Connection: The Shut Door and the Open Gate In the early days of the Advent movement, following the Great Disappointment of 1844, the pioneers wrestled with the “Shut Door” theory—the idea that probation had closed for the world. James White and others eventually moved to an “Open Door” theology, realizing that the message must go to “peoples, and nations, and tongues.” Isaiah 56 played a crucial role in this transition. As James White noted in 1862, the prophecy applies when “salvation is near to come”. The realization that the “stranger” and the “eunuch” were to be gathered now, in the antitypical Day of Atonement, broke the insularity of the early Millerite group. It opened the way for the global mission of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. The “stranger” was no longer an enemy; he was a candidate for the Kingdom. The “Sabbath” was the testing truth that would sift the nations. This “Open Gate” theology was the engine of Adventist growth for seventy years. The 1914 Connection: The Great Apostasy and the Closed Gate Seventy years later, the church faced another crisis. The “Open Gate” of mission had led to institutional growth, but also to institutional compromise. The “watchmen” had become comfortable. When the test of war came, the leaders in Europe chose to close the gate of faithfulness and open the gate to the “beasts” of nationalism. The movement arose to reclaim the “Shut Door” in a different sense—not closing the door of mercy, but closing the door to sin. They stood as the “watchmen” who refused to let the Sabbath be polluted by the blood of war. They embodied the “eunuch” who chose the “things that please me” (v. 4) over the things that pleased the Kaiser. The “dumb dogs” of 1914 are the spiritual ancestors of those who today preach “Peace and Safety” in the face of ecumenical compromise. The movement is the spiritual descendant of the “outcasts” who were gathered by God when the shepherds failed. The Present Crisis: The Ecumenical Danger Today, the “blind watchmen” face a new temptation: Ecumenism. The “gathering” of Isaiah 56:8 is being misinterpreted by the liberal wing of Adventism as a call to merge with the other “folds” of Christendom in a generic, doctrinal soup. They argue that “God gathers others,” so we must minimize our distinctives to welcome them. But the Reformer points to verse 6: The strangers are gathered to “serve him, and to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants, every one that keepeth the sabbath from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant.” The gathering is conditional on the Covenant and the Sabbath. It is not an ecumenical lowering of the bar; it is a lifting of the standard. The “others” are gathered to the Sabbath, not to a Sunday-keeping common ground. The “dumb dogs” of today are those who refuse to bark against the dilution of the Three Angels’ Messages. They cry “Peace and Safety” by signing joint declarations with the Papacy or by downplaying the Prophetic interpretation of the Beast and the Image. The worker must be the antidote to this silence. Prophecy reverberates across eras. And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it (Isaiah 2:2, KJV). And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:3, KJV). Sr. White foresaw, “These words apply in the Christian age, as shown by the context: ‘The Lord God which gathereth the outcasts of Israel saith, Yet will I gather others to him, beside those that are gathered unto him.’ Isaiah 56:8” (Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, vol. 19, 1862). A thematic insight from Sr. White shares, “The Lord has declared that the Gentiles shall be gathered in, and not the Gentiles only, but the dispersed of Judah” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 6, p. 329, 1900). This echo guides our path. What manifesto empowers the vigilant?

WHAT EMPOWERS NEW WATCHMEN?

Isaiah 56 reveals that the faithful worker is called to embody both the courage of the outcast and the vigilance of the watchman, standing as a living witness that God gathers, preserves, and sends those who refuse compromise. The prophet declares God’s promise to the marginalized, “Even unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name… an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off” (Isaiah 56:5, KJV), showing that the “dry tree” who clings to faithfulness is honored in heaven even if rejected on earth. This identity brings responsibility, for God rebukes the unfaithful leaders as “dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber” (Isaiah 56:10, KJV), exposing the danger of silence, comfort, and self-preservation. Inspiration affirms that the true sentinel must never be lulled by complacency, for “It is no time now for God’s people to be weaklings… We must be wide awake, on our guard against the wiles of Satan” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 102), and again, “Those who stand as watchmen… must not sleep on guard; for the enemy never slumbers” (Gospel Workers, p. 14). This watchfulness extends to proclaiming the universal Sabbath as God’s sign for all nations, for “My house shall be called a house of prayer for all people” (Isaiah 56:7, KJV), and Ellen White confirms, “The Sabbath is a sign of the relationship existing between God and His people” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 6, p. 349). Thus the worker gathers the outcasts, awakens the careless, welcomes the stranger to the covenant, and warns of the beasts that threaten the flock, fulfilling the prophetic role of one who stands faithfully on God’s holy mountain, guarding His people and advancing His mission with courage and love.

And ye shall be holy unto me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be mine (Leviticus 20:26, KJV). Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you (Leviticus 18:26, KJV). In Early Writings we read, “The Open and the Shut Door. Sabbath, March 24, 1849, we had a sweet and very interesting meeting with the brethren at Topsham, Maine” (Early Writings, p. 42, 1882). Sr. White encouraged, “God has given us the whole of six days in which to do our work, and has reserved only one to Himself. This should be a day of blessing to us—a day when we should especially seek God that we may receive His grace, and power to resist temptation” (The Seventh-day Sabbath, 1885). This manifesto equips for service.

As we stand at the end of the age, the desert of Isaiah 56 blooms with a fierce hope. The “salvation is near to come.” The time of the “blind watchmen” is drawing to a close. Their “tomorrow” will not be “as this day.” Judgment is coming, and the “beasts of the field” will eventually devour the false shepherds who failed to protect the flock. But for the faithful—the eunuchs, the strangers, the outcasts who held fast to the Sabbath and the Covenant—there remains the promise of the Yad Vashem. Within the walls of the New Jerusalem, there will be a place for those who were pushed out of the earthly temples. There will be a name for those who were called “schismatics” and “fanatics” and “reformers.” The movement exists to steward this promise. It is the custodian of the “bark.” It is the home of the “dry tree” that has flourished by the rivers of living water. Let the worker go forth with the confidence of Isaiah, knowing that while the watchmen of the world may sleep, the Keeper of Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps. And in His house, there is room for every outcast who keeps the Sabbath holy. “Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the son of man that layeth hold on it.” Hope triumphs in fidelity. And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him (Revelation 22:3, KJV). “And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh (Ezekiel 11:19, KJV). A passage from The Great Controversy reminds us, “Thus the obligation of the fourth commandment extends past the crucifixion, resurrection, and ascension of Christ, to the time when His servants should preach to all nations the message of glad tidings” (The Great Controversy, p. 451, 1911). Sr. White concluded, “The Sabbath was hallowed at the creation. As ordained for man, it had its origin when ‘the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy’” (The Desire of Ages, p. 769, 1898). This promise endures eternally.

SELF-REFLECTION

How can I deepen my grasp of Isaiah 56’s inclusive Sabbath message in daily devotions, letting it transform my commitment to holiness?

How might we present the themes of inclusion and watchful leadership in Isaiah 56 to varied groups, ensuring accessibility while upholding scriptural integrity?

What misunderstandings about Sabbath observance and church leadership persist in our circles, and how can Scripture and Sr. White’s insights correct them compassionately?

How can we embody Isaiah 56’s call to gather outcasts and guard truth, making our community a vibrant house of prayer for all?

For more articles, please go to http://www.faithfundamentals.blog or our podcast at: https://rss.com/podcasts/the-lamb.

If you have a prayer request, please leave it in the comments below. Prayer meetings are held on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. To join, enter your email address in the comments section.