Heaven’s Vision. Earth’s Mission. One Standard.

J. Hector Garcia

SANCTUARY: A JOURNEY INTO THE HEART OF HEAVEN

“Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.” (Hebrews 4:16, KJV)

ABSTRACT

This article delves into the profound realities of the heavenly sanctuary as the center of divine mercy and Christ’s ministry, the cities of refuge as earthly types of grace and protection, the high priest’s role in justice and atonement, Christ as the ultimate refuge for sinners, and the resurrection as the power source of salvation. It reflects God’s proactive love in these provisions, outlines personal and communal responsibilities, and concludes with assurance in the interconnected plan of redemption.

THE DIVINE CALL!

In an age that rushes to flatten mystery into metaphor, to dissolve the sublime into the symbolic, we are called to stand as witnesses to a truth that is both profound and profoundly real. We are tasked with presenting a God who does not merely communicate in abstract principles but in architectural plans, in historical systems, and in the flesh-and-blood reality of His Son. This is not a journey into a theological construct; it is an exploration of the very command center of the universe, the heart of heaven itself. The purpose of this study is to equip you, to present these foundational truths with a confidence born of clarity and a passion born of awe. We will travel from the dusty roads leading to ancient cities of refuge to the gleaming courts of the heavenly sanctuary, demonstrating how a real place, a divinely ordained legal system, and a physical resurrection converge into a single, overwhelming reality: our present, tangible, and unshakeable hope in Jesus Christ. We must resist the modern tendency to demythologize the sacred, for in God’s economy, the literal and the symbolic are not enemies but partners in revelation. The sanctuary is not just an idea; it is a place. The refuge is not just a feeling; it is a person. And our salvation is not just a theory; it is a victory secured in time and space, offered to us today at a throne of grace that is as real as the God who sits upon it. God’s plan provides refuge through Christ’s resurrection, but how does the heavenly sanctuary reveal this divine mercy?

HEAVENLY SANCTUARY POWER!

The doctrine of the heavenly sanctuary stands as the central pillar of our faith, yet it is often the first to be assailed by those who would reduce its grandeur to a mere allegory. Our first responsibility as teachers of this truth is to establish its concrete reality. The heavenly sanctuary is not a nebulous concept, a state of mind, or a poetic device; it is a literal, physical place where Christ, our High Priest, ministers on our behalf. Ellen G. White affirms this with unshakable clarity, stating, “The sanctuary in heaven, in which Jesus ministers in our behalf, is the great original, of which the sanctuary built by Moses was a copy.” (The Great Controversy, 414). This direct comparison establishes a relationship of original to copy, of reality to shadow. A copy, by its very nature, demands the existence of an original. Further solidifying this, she recounts her own vision: “I was shown the sanctuary of heaven, and the ark that enshrines the tables of the covenant, which is covered with the mercy-seat and surrounded by angels.” (Early Writings, 32). The specificity of this vision—the ark, the mercy seat, the attendant angels—precludes a purely metaphorical interpretation. This is not the language of symbolism alone; it is the description of a place with spatial and functional elements. The Bible itself confirms that the earthly tabernacle was constructed according to a divine blueprint, a pattern of a pre-existing reality. God commanded Moses, “And look that thou make them after their pattern, which was shewed thee in the mount.” (Exodus 25:40, KJV). The New Testament powerfully echoes this, explaining that the Levitical priests “serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.” (Hebrews 8:5, KJV). This is not just a spiritual parallel; it is a direct, tangible link between two locations, one on earth and One in heaven. “The LORD is in his holy temple; let all the earth keep silence before him” (Habakkuk 2:20, KJV). “Thy righteousness is an everlasting righteousness, and thy law is the truth” (Psalm 119:142, KJV). “In the sanctuary in heaven, the dwelling place of God, his throne is established in righteousness and judgment. In the most holy place is his law, the great rule of right by which all mankind are tested” (The Great Controversy, p. 415, 1911). “The correct understanding of the ministration in the heavenly sanctuary is the foundation of our faith” (Evangelism, p. 221, 1906). The doctrine of a literal sanctuary is therefore not a peripheral belief but the very foundation upon which our understanding of Christ’s present work is built, anchoring our faith not in an idea, but in the ongoing, real-time activity within the throne room of the universe. Why do the terms “sanctuary” and “true tabernacle” describe the same heavenly reality?

SANCTUARY TERMS UNVEILED!

While the physical reality of the sanctuary is thus firmly established, the apostolic writers employed a nuanced vocabulary to describe it, not to create confusion, but to reveal its multifaceted glory. In the book of Hebrews, the terms “sanctuary” (Greek: Hagion) and “true tabernacle” (Greek: Skēnēs alēthinēs) are used to describe the same heavenly reality from two different but complementary perspectives. The Apostle Paul writes, “Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens; A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man.” (Hebrews 8:1–2, KJV). These are not two different locations but two descriptive titles for the single, divine dwelling where Christ ministers. The term “sanctuary” highlights its sacred function and its inherent holiness, while “true tabernacle” emphasizes its divine origin and authenticity—it is the genuine article, the original, pitched by the Lord Himself, not by human hands. Sr. White confirms this unified understanding, using the terms interchangeably to illuminate Christ’s work: “The tabernacle in the heavens, the true sanctuary which the Lord pitched, and not man, is the center of Christ’s work in behalf of men.” (The Desire of Ages, 166). This distinction is vital for us, as it prevents the misunderstanding that there are multiple heavenly locations. Instead, it allows us to present a richer, more complete picture: the place of Christ’s ministry is holy in its purpose (sanctuary) and authentic in its origin (true tabernacle). This understanding is further reinforced by the Psalmist, who declared, “The LORD is in his holy temple, the LORD’S throne is in heaven: his eyes behold, his eyelids try, the children of men.” (Psalm 11:4, KJV). The prophet Habakkuk echoes this, commanding reverence before a God who occupies a real, holy place: “But the LORD is in his holy temple: let all the earth keep silence before him.” (Habakkuk 2:20, KJV). “The sanctuary in heaven is the very center of Christ’s work in behalf of men. It concerns every soul living upon the earth” (The Great Controversy, p. 488, 1911). “The holy places made with hands were to be ‘figures of the true,’ ‘patterns of things in the heavens’ (Hebrews 9:24, 23)—a miniature representation of the heavenly temple where Christ, our great High Priest, after offering His life as a sacrifice, was to minister in the sinner’s behalf” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 343, 1890). These passages ground our theology in the reality of a God who is not an abstract force but a personal Sovereign ruling from a definite seat of authority, a place that is both a holy sanctuary and the true tabernacle of the Most High. How does Revelation confirm the sanctuary’s tangible nature against pantheism?

REVELATION’S TEMPLE VISION!

Even as the Old Testament prophets pointed to a real heavenly dwelling, the apostle John, in the visions of Revelation, was granted access to this very place, confirming its tangible, operational nature. His testimony is not of a vague spiritual realm, but of an active, functioning temple. He declares, “And after that I looked, and, behold, the temple of the tabernacle of the testimony in heaven was opened:” (Revelation 15:5, KJV). The use of the word “opened” signifies an event, an action taking place within a real structure. This is not the language of metaphor but of observation. The book of Hebrews powerfully contrasts the earthly “figures” with “heaven itself,” drawing a direct comparison between the copy and the original, the shadow and the substance. Paul explains, “For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us:” (Hebrews 9:24, KJV). This distinction is the bedrock of our sanctuary doctrine, a defense against any attempt to allegorize it away. Our pioneers, men like Uriah Smith, understood this perfectly. His entire prophetic framework, as detailed in works like Daniel and the Revelation, was built upon the foundation of a literal sanctuary in heaven. He writes not of symbols explaining symbols, but of real events unfolding within a real place, the command center for the great controversy. Sr. White warned, we must not allow “the clatter of words coming from human lips” to “lessen the belief of our people in the truth that there is a sanctuary in heaven.” (Letter 233, 1904). A purely metaphorical sanctuary dissolves the distinct personality of God, reducing Him to an impersonal force. But a literal sanctuary preserves the truth of a personal God on a throne, in a specific place, hearing our prayers and directing the affairs of the universe. “Thy way, O God, is in the sanctuary: who is so great a God as our God?” (Psalm 77:13, KJV). “Thy righteousness also, O God, is very high, who hast done great things: O God, who is like unto thee!” (Psalm 71:19, KJV). “The intercession of Christ in man’s behalf in the sanctuary above is as essential to the plan of salvation as was His death upon the cross. By His death He began that work which after His resurrection He ascended to complete in heaven” (The Great Controversy, p. 489, 1911). “The sanctuary in heaven is the very center of Christ’s work in behalf of men. It concerns every soul living upon the earth” (The Great Controversy, p. 488, 1911). This is the truth we must proclaim: our prayers are not sent into a vague cosmos but are directed to a throne of grace in a literal heavenly temple. What earthly type did God establish to teach divine mercy?

REFUGE CITIES OF MERCY!

While the heavenly sanctuary stands as the ultimate center of divine mercy, God, in His infinite wisdom, established a powerful earthly type to teach this truth in a way His people could see and touch. The cities of refuge were not a mere footnote in Israel’s legal code; they were a divinely mandated, sacred institution designed to be a living parable of grace. Their establishment came by direct command, not human invention. The Lord instructed Joshua, “Appoint out for you cities of refuge, whereof I spake unto you by the hand of Moses.” (Joshua 20:2, KJV). This command was specific and foundational: “And among the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites there shall be six cities for refuge, which ye shall appoint for the manslayer, that he may flee thither.” (Numbers 35:6, KJV). The divine origin of this system elevates it from simple jurisprudence to profound theology. Sr. White underscores this, explaining, “The cities of refuge were appointed for all Israel, and for the stranger as well. They were a merciful provision of God, to protect the innocent and to typify the refuge we have in Christ.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, 516). This was God’s plan, a tangible expression of His character, a system where justice and mercy met on the dusty roads of Canaan. The very existence of these cities was a sermon in stone, declaring that the God of Israel was a God who makes a way of escape. “The Lord thy God in the midst of thee is mighty; he will save, he will rejoice over thee with joy; he will rest in his love, he will joy over thee with singing” (Zephaniah 3:17, KJV). “For he hath looked down from the height of his sanctuary; from heaven did the Lord behold the earth” (Psalm 102:19, KJV). “The cities of refuge appointed for God’s ancient people were a symbol of the refuge provided in Christ. The same merciful Saviour who appointed those temporal cities of refuge has by the shedding of His own blood provided for the transgressors of God’s law a sure retreat, into which they may flee for safety from the second death” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 516, 1890). “The Lord would teach His people to be ever watchful for every privilege within their reach to aid them to regain health. He would have them co-operate with Him in restoring health to the suffering” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 231, 1905). Though God Himself is the ultimate refuge, how does the system He designed ensure access to mercy for all?

MERCY’S ACCESSIBLE PATHS!

Though God Himself is the ultimate refuge, the system He designed for Israel demonstrates His profound concern for practical, equitable access to mercy for all. The placement of the six cities was a masterstroke of divine engineering, ensuring that no one was too far from safety. The Lord commanded, “Ye shall give three cities on this side Jordan, and three cities shall ye give in the land of Canaan, which shall be cities of refuge.” (Numbers 35:14, KJV). The names of these cities, strategically distributed north, central, and south on both sides of the river, are recorded for us: “Kedesh in Galilee in mount Naphtali, and Shechem in mount Ephraim, and Kirjatharba, which is Hebron, in the mountain of Judah. And on the other side Jordan by Jericho eastward, they assigned Bezer in the wilderness upon the plain out of the tribe of Reuben, and Ramoth in Gilead out of the tribe of Gad, and Golan in Bashan out of the tribe of Manasseh.” (Joshua 20:7–8, KJV). This geographical balance was not accidental; it was a physical manifestation of God’s impartiality, a truth later articulated by Peter when he declared, “Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:” (Acts 10:34, KJV). The logistics of grace were paramount. Sr. White paints a vivid picture of this system in action: “These cities were so distributed as to be within a half-day’s journey of any part of the land… The roads leading to them were always to be kept in good repair; all along the way, signposts were to be erected bearing the word Refuge in plain, bold characters, that the fleeing one might not be delayed.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, 515). This command to “prepare thee a way” (Deuteronomy 19:3, KJV) reveals a God whose mercy is not passive but active. He commanded that the very infrastructure of grace—clear, well-maintained roads and unambiguous signs—be established so that no soul, in the panic of flight, would lose their way. This is a powerful, tangible illustration of a God who plans our salvation with meticulous fairness and compassion. “He that dwelleth in the secret place of the most High shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty” (Psalm 91:1, KJV). “The Lord redeemeth the soul of his servants: and none of them that trust in him shall be desolate” (Psalm 34:22, KJV). “The Lord would teach His people to be ever watchful for every privilege within their reach to aid them to regain health. He would have them co-operate with Him in restoring health to the suffering” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 231, 1905). “In the cities of refuge appointed for God’s ancient people were a symbol of the refuge provided in Christ. The same merciful Saviour who appointed those temporal cities of refuge has by the shedding of His own blood provided for the transgressors of God’s law a sure retreat, into which they may flee for safety from the second death” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 516, 1890). How were the cities of refuge administered to ensure justice and mercy?

LEVITICAL JUSTICE HAVENS!

Beyond their strategic placement, the cities of refuge were administered by the very tribe consecrated to God’s service, ensuring that justice and mercy were dispensed with spiritual gravity. The Bible is clear that these havens were chosen from among the Levitical towns: “So all the cities which ye shall give to the Levites shall be forty and eight cities… And among the cities which ye shall give unto the Levites there shall be six cities for refuge.” (Numbers 35:7, 6, KJV). This was part of a broader divine plan for the spiritual health of the nation. As Sr. White explains, “The cities of the Levites were so distributed throughout the land that all the people might have the benefits of the instruction and ministrations of this tribe.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, 514). A fugitive entering a city of refuge was not merely entering a neutral zone; they were entering a community dedicated to the study and worship of God. Here, surrounded by those who handled the sacred law, the fugitive could find not only legal protection but also spiritual counsel and an opportunity for reflection and repentance. This arrangement fused Israel’s civil law with its spiritual life, demonstrating that in God’s kingdom, there is no separation between the sacred and the secular. The very laws governing their daily safety were designed to teach them the principles of redemption, making every aspect of their society a testament to the character of their God. “Let all the earth fear the Lord: let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of him” (Psalm 33:8, KJV). “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do his commandments: his praise endureth for ever” (Psalm 111:10, KJV). “The Lord had made the Israelites the depositaries of sacred truth, to be given to the world” (The Desire of Ages, p. 27, 1898). “God had chosen Israel as His peculiar people, to preserve His truth in the earth” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 314, 1890). What unique figure holds the key to freedom in Israel’s system?

HIGH PRIEST OF FREEDOM!

While the cities themselves provided physical safety, the key to ultimate freedom and restoration was held by a single, unique figure: the high priest. It is critical for us to understand that in Israel, there was only one high priest at a time, a role distinct in its function and authority from the many Levitical priests scattered throughout the land. The law specified the singular nature of this office: “And the high priest among his brethren, upon whose head the anointing oil was poured, and that is consecrated to put on the garments, shall not uncover his head, nor rend his clothes;” (Leviticus 21:10, KJV). While the general priests and Levites were numerous and dwelt in their forty-eight designated cities (1 Chronicles 23:3-5, KJV), the high priest’s ministry was tied exclusively to the central sanctuary, first in Shiloh and later in Jerusalem. This is where the nation’s sins were symbolically handled and where the ultimate atonement was made. Sr. White reinforces this singular role, drawing the direct parallel to Christ: “The high priest, having made the atonement for Israel, came forth and blessed the congregation. So Christ, at the close of His work as mediator, will appear… to bless His waiting people with eternal life.” (The Great Controversy, 485). The freedom of every fugitive, in all six cities of refuge, was bound to the life and death of this one man. This unified, national system of justice points unmistakably to the one Christ, whose singular death provides a universal release for all who flee to Him. This structure powerfully refutes any notion of multiple paths or regional saviors; there was one sanctuary, one high priest, and one way to full restoration. “And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family” (Leviticus 25:10, KJV). “And thou shalt anoint Aaron and his sons, and consecrate them, that they may minister unto me in the priest’s office” (Exodus 30:30, KJV). “The high priest was a type of Christ. Through His death, we are released from the condemnation of the law and go free, as the slayer went free upon the death of the high priest” (Review and Herald, January 4, 1881). “The high priest, having made the atonement for Israel, came forth and blessed the congregation. So Christ, at the close of His work as mediator, will appear… to bless His waiting people with eternal life” (The Great Controversy, p. 485, 1911). How does the biblical text clarify the high priest’s role in the fugitive’s release?

RELEASE THROUGH DEATH!

The biblical text leaves no room for ambiguity about who held the key to the fugitive’s release. The law is explicit: the manslayer “shall dwell in [the city of refuge] until the death of the high priest, which was anointed with the holy oil.” (Numbers 35:25, KJV). The specificity of this phrase—“which was anointed with the holy oil”—is definitive. It points directly to the national high priest consecrated for service in the tabernacle, the one man set apart by this sacred rite, and not to any local Levitical elder. Only after this specific event could the fugitive be fully liberated: “But after the death of the high priest the slayer shall return into the land of his possession.” (Numbers 35:28, KJV). This provision was not merely a chronological marker or a convenient statute of limitations. It was a profound theological statement embedded within Israel’s civil law. The high priest’s death was not just a political transition; it was a typological event that reset the scales of justice for those living under its shadow. It was a national jubilee for the unintentionally guilty, a clean slate offered through the passing of the nation’s spiritual head. This divine ordinance served as a constant, living lesson, teaching that true freedom from the consequences of a fatal mistake was inextricably linked to the death of God’s anointed mediator. “And he shall make an atonement for the holy place, because of the uncleanness of the children of Israel, and because of their transgressions in all their sins: and so shall he do for the tabernacle of the congregation, that remaineth among them in the midst of their uncleanness” (Leviticus 16:16, KJV). “And he shall sprinkle of the blood upon it with his finger seven times, and cleanse it, and hallow it from the uncleanness of the children of Israel” (Leviticus 16:19, KJV). “The prisoner who at any time went outside the city of refuge was abandoned to the avenger of blood. Even so, it is not enough that the sinner believe in Christ for pardon of sin; he must, by faith and obedience, abide in Him” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 516, 1890). “The high priest was a type of Christ. Through His death, we are released from the condemnation of the law and go free, as the slayer went free upon the death of the high priest” (Review and Herald, January 4, 1881). What profound significance lies in the death of the high priest?

ATONEMENT’S DEEP MEANING!

The most profound layer of this divine ordinance, however, lies in its typological significance. The death of the high priest was understood as a symbolic atonement, a powerful and living parable that prefigured how the death of our great High Priest, Jesus Christ, would provide the ultimate release from the condemnation of God’s law. Sr. White illuminates this connection with beautiful clarity: “The prisoner who fled to the city of refuge could not be released until the death of the high priest. The death of the high priest was regarded as atoning, in a figure, for the guilty. So the death of Christ is a pledge of deliverance to those who repent and flee to the refuge of His mercy.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, 516). The death of a human priest, himself a sinner in need of atonement, could never truly pay the price for sin. Yet, God invested this event with immense symbolic weight, weaving the plan of salvation into the very fabric of Israel’s legal system. She further states, “The high priest was a type of Christ. Through His death, we are released from the condemnation of the law and go free, as the slayer went free upon the death of the high priest.” (Review and Herald, January 4, 1881). Year after year, generation after generation, this system taught a vital truth: release from guilt, exile, and the threat of the avenger comes only through the death of the High Priest. This was not just a law; it was a promise, a shadow of the good things to come when Christ, our true High Priest, would lay down His life once for all. “And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission” (Hebrews 9:22, KJV). “And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins” (Hebrews 10:11, KJV). “The death of the high priest was regarded as atoning, in a figure, for the guilty. So the death of Christ is a pledge of deliverance to those who repent and flee to the refuge of His mercy” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 516, 1890). “The high priest was a type of Christ. Through His death, we are released from the condemnation of the law and go free, as the slayer went free upon the death of the high priest” (Review and Herald, January 4, 1881). How do the earthly types point to the glorious antitype in Christ?

CHRIST OUR SAFE HAVEN!

Having explored the earthly types, we now arrive at the glorious antitype, the substance to which all shadows pointed. The entire, intricate system of refuge cities, with their promise of safety, their well-maintained roads, and their hope of release, was a living prophecy pointing to the perfect, eternal refuge found only in Jesus Christ. The language of refuge permeates the Scriptures, a constant refrain of hope for the soul pursued by sin and condemnation. The Psalmist exults, “God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.” (Psalm 46:1, KJV). He makes it a personal declaration of faith: “I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust.” (Psalm 91:2, KJV). This is not mere poetry; it is a theological reality. Sr. White draws the line from type to antitype with unmistakable precision: “The cities of refuge appointed for God’s ancient people were a symbol of the refuge provided in Christ. The same merciful Saviour who appointed those temporal cities of refuge has by the shedding of His own blood provided for the transgressors of God’s law a sure retreat, into which they may flee for safety from the second death.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, 516). The physical safety offered in Hebron or Ramoth was a temporary, earthly picture of the eternal safety from the “avenger of blood”—the law’s just condemnation and the finality of the second death—that is offered in Christ. No power, human or demonic, can touch the soul that has fled to this divine haven. As Sr. White continues, “No power can take out of His hands the souls that go to Him for pardon.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, 516). “In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you” (John 14:2, KJV). “The eternal God is thy refuge, and underneath are the everlasting arms: and he shall thrust out the enemy from before thee; and shall say, Destroy them” (Deuteronomy 33:27, KJV). “Christ is our refuge, our strong tower, into which we may run and be safe” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 3, p. 328, 1875). “In Christ we have a refuge, a sanctuary from the storms of life, a covert from the tempest” (Messages to Young People, p. 117, 1930). This is the ultimate security, the final fortress for the penitent soul. What sacred role does the church play in salvation?

CHURCH AS SPIRITUAL REFUGE!

While Christ Himself is the true and living refuge, the church has been given a sacred and solemn role in this divine system of salvation. The church is God’s divinely appointed agency to function as a spiritual city of refuge on earth—the visible community that marks the path, extends the invitation, and provides a haven for those fleeing to Him. The Old Testament is rich with imagery of Zion, the church, as a place of divine establishment and protection. The psalmist sings, “And of Zion it shall be said, This and that man was born in her: and the highest himself shall establish her.” (Psalm 87:5, KJV). Isaiah prophesies a time when God’s presence would be a palpable defense for His people: “And the LORD will create upon every dwelling place of mount Zion, and upon her assemblies, a cloud and smoke by day, and the shining of a flaming fire by night: for upon all the glory shall be a defence. And there shall be a tabernacle for a shadow in the daytime from the heat, and for a place of refuge, and for a covert from storm and from rain.” (Isaiah 4:5-6, KJV). This prophecy finds its fulfillment in the Christian church. Sr. White defines its mission in the clearest of terms: “The church is God’s appointed agency for the salvation of men. It was organized for service, and its mission is to carry the gospel to the world.” (The Acts of the Apostles, 9). She then makes the connection to our typology explicit: “As the man-slayer was not secure until he was within the city of refuge, so the sinner is not safe until he is in Christ… The Church must be a city of refuge, pointing sinners to Jesus.” (Review and Herald, April 5, 1898, par. 9). The church itself does not save—only Christ does—but it is the institution through which the message of salvation is proclaimed. Like the well-maintained roads and the bold signposts of ancient Israel, the church has a holy responsibility to make the path to Christ clear, accessible, and free from all human-made obstacles and debris. “And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name” (Isaiah 62:2, KJV). “And they shall call them, The holy people, The redeemed of the Lord: and thou shalt be called, Sought out, A city not forsaken” (Isaiah 62:12, KJV). “The church is the channel of God’s purpose to communicate His grace to the world” (The Acts of the Apostles, p. 13, 1911). “Through the church, God designs to manifest His wisdom, His power, and His glory, to the principalities and powers in heavenly places” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 8, p. 15, 1904). What missional mandate does the design of the ancient cities provide for the church today?

CLEAR PATHS TO CHRIST!

The clear and practical design of the ancient cities of refuge provides a powerful, missional mandate for the church today. God commanded Israel not just to have these cities, but to actively maintain the roads and erect clear signposts. Access was a non-negotiable part of the system. This becomes a profound metaphor for our work. “Maintaining the roads” means we must actively identify and remove any obstacle that might hinder a soul from finding refuge in Christ. What are these modern obstacles? They can be cultural barriers that make the church feel exclusive, theological jargon that confuses the seeker, hypocritical behavior that belies our message, or an unwelcoming atmosphere that turns away the very people who need safety the most. A “poorly maintained road” is a church that, through its actions or inaction, makes it difficult for a sinner to approach a loving Savior. Therefore, our responsibility is not merely to be a refuge, but to engage in constant spiritual “road maintenance.” This requires honest, prayerful self-examination: Are our methods clear and our message accessible? Is our community a safe haven or a confusing maze of cliques and expectations? Is our worship a beacon of hope or a barrier of formality? The divine command for physical infrastructure in the Old Testament becomes a spiritual mandate for the culture and outreach of the church in the New. We are called to be living signposts, and our collective life must be a clear, bold sign that reads, “REFUGE.” “And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely” (Revelation 22:17, KJV). “Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price” (Isaiah 55:1, KJV). “The church is God’s appointed agency for the salvation of men. It was organized for service, and its mission is to carry the gospel to the world” (The Acts of the Apostles, p. 9, 1911). “The church is God’s appointed agency for the salvation of men. It was organized for service, and its mission is to carry the gospel to the world. From the beginning it has been God’s plan that through His church shall be reflected to the world His fullness and His sufficiency” (The Acts of the Apostles, p. 9, 1911). What event powers the entire plan of salvation?

RESURRECTION LIFE FORCE!

We now arrive at the capstone of our faith, the event that powers the entire plan of salvation: the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This is not an isolated miracle or a mere historical postscript to the cross; it is the very engine room of the heavenly sanctuary. Without a risen, living High Priest, the entire sanctuary system, from its outer court to its most holy place, would be a dark, silent, and powerless monument to a failed mission. The apostle Paul makes this point with devastating logic: “And if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain; ye are yet in your sins. Then they also which are fallen asleep in Christ are perished.” (1 Corinthians 15:17–18, KJV). His argument is absolute. A dead Savior cannot intercede. A dead High Priest cannot apply the merits of his sacrifice. A defeated Messiah cannot offer hope. The cross provides the means of our reconciliation, but it is the resurrection that secures our salvation. As Paul also wrote, “For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.” (Romans 5:10, KJV). It is the resurrection that transforms the tragedy of Calvary into the triumph of redemption. It is the victory that “hath begotten us again unto a lively hope” (1 Peter 1:3, KJV). This event is the divine activation key, the moment Christ passed from being the Lamb slain to being the Priest who lives forevermore, enabling Him to enter the heavenly sanctuary and begin His glorious work of mediation. “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead” (1 Peter 1:3, KJV). “For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him” (1 Thessalonians 4:14, KJV). “The resurrection of Lazarus was a most striking evidence of Christ’s power to raise the dead” (The Desire of Ages, p. 536, 1898). “By raising Lazarus from the dead, Christ declared Himself the Resurrection and the Life” (The Great Controversy, p. 524, 1911). How did Jesus identify His body as the true temple?

TEMPLE BODY RESTORED!

Early in His ministry, Jesus Himself identified His own body as the true temple, the ultimate sanctuary where God would dwell with humanity, and pointed to His resurrection as the definitive sign of His divine authority. After cleansing the earthly temple, the Jews demanded a sign, and “Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19, KJV). They, in their literalism, thought of Herod’s magnificent structure, but the apostle John clarifies the profound truth: “But he spake of the temple of his body.” (John 2:21, KJV). Here, Christ declared that the physical temple, with its rituals and sacrifices, was merely a symbol pointing to Him. His body was the true meeting place between God and man. Sr. White beautifully unfolds this concept: “In the cleansing of the temple, Jesus was announcing His mission as the Messiah, and entering upon His work. That temple, erected for the abode of the divine Presence, was designed to be an object lesson for Israel and for the world…. But by the incarnation of the Son of God, the purpose of heaven is fulfilled. God dwells in humanity, and through saving grace the heart of man becomes again His temple.” (The Desire of Ages, 161). When Jesus cleansed the earthly temple, He asserted His authority over the symbolic system. But when He raised His own body from the grave, He established Himself as the new and living temple, the foundation and chief cornerstone of a spiritual house, the church, which is to be “an habitation of God through the Spirit.” (Ephesians 2:22, KJV). His resurrection was the ultimate act of temple restoration, creating a new and living way for all humanity to approach God. “And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus” (Ephesians 2:6, KJV). “For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones” (Ephesians 5:30, KJV). “In the cleansing of the temple, Jesus was announcing His mission as the Messiah, and entering upon His work. That temple, erected for the abode of the divine Presence, was designed to be an object lesson for Israel and for the world…. But by the incarnation of the Son of God, the purpose of heaven is fulfilled. God dwells in humanity, and through saving grace the heart of man becomes again His temple” (The Desire of Ages, p. 161, 1898). “Christ permitted Lazarus to pass under the dominion of death, and the suffering sisters saw their brother laid in the grave. Christ knew that as they looked on the dead face of their brother, their faith in their Redeemer would be severely tried. But He knew that because of the struggle through which they were now passing, their faith would shine forth with far greater power” (The Desire of Ages, p. 528, 1898). What demonstration of resurrection power did Jesus display in Bethany?

LAZARUS POWER PREVIEW!

This resurrection power was not held in reserve until after the cross; it was put on stunning display in the village of Bethany, in the raising of Lazarus. This was no mere act of compassion; it was a deliberate, strategic demonstration of the very power that would define Christ’s own victory and empower His entire sanctuary ministry. In the face of Martha’s grief, Jesus made the most profound claim in all of Scripture: “I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?” (John 11:25–26, KJV). His delay in coming to Bethany was not an act of neglect but a lesson in divine timing and a test of faith. Sr. White explains the divine purpose behind the pain: “Christ permitted Lazarus to pass under the dominion of death, and the suffering sisters saw their brother laid in the grave. Christ knew that as they looked on the dead face of their brother, their faith in their Redeemer would be severely tried. But He knew that because of the struggle through which they were now passing, their faith would shine forth with far greater power.” (The Desire of Ages, 528). Jesus allowed death to have its apparent, temporary victory only to demonstrate His absolute and eternal power over it. This was not just a miracle for one grieving family; it was a living parable for the entire world, a preview of His own triumph over the grave. It proved that His claim to be “the resurrection and the life” was not rhetoric but reality. This is the very same power that makes His intercession for us in the sanctuary effective today—the power to bring life from death, hope from despair, and to secure our own future resurrection. “For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first” (1 Thessalonians 4:16, KJV). “Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed” (1 Corinthians 15:51, KJV). “The resurrection of Lazarus was a most striking evidence of Christ’s power to raise the dead” (The Desire of Ages, p. 536, 1898). “By raising Lazarus from the dead, Christ declared Himself the Resurrection and the Life” (The Great Controversy, p. 524, 1911). How does the sanctuary system reflect God’s love?

GOD’S LOVE REVEALED!

The intricate, interconnected system of a literal sanctuary, its earthly copy, and the cities of refuge reveals a God whose love is not a vague sentiment or a passive emotion, but a proactive, architectural, and legally profound force. This love anticipates our deepest needs and provides a tangible, equitable, and meticulously planned path to safety. It is a love that builds. God did not simply offer an abstract concept of “refuge”; He commanded the establishment of six physical cities, ensuring the roads were maintained and the signs were clear. He did not merely suggest a path to forgiveness; He constructed a sanctuary in heaven, the great original, and provided a copy on earth so that we might understand its functions. This love is seen in the details—in the very geography of grace that placed mercy within a half-day’s journey for every soul in Israel. This is the character of the God who promises, “For thou wilt light my candle: the Lord my God will enlighten my darkness.” (Psalm 18:28, KJV). His love is an active intervention, a light that pierces our darkness. It is a love that acts on behalf of its enemies, as Paul explains, “For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.” (Romans 5:10, KJV). Sr. White summarizes this architectural love perfectly: “The cities of refuge appointed for God’s ancient people were a symbol of the refuge provided in Christ. The same merciful Saviour who appointed those temporal cities of refuge has by the shedding of His own blood provided for the transgressors of God’s law a sure retreat, into which they may flee for safety from the second death. No power can take out of His hands the souls that go to Him for pardon.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, 516). God’s love, therefore, is not an abstract ideal but a divine strategy, a flawless blueprint for our redemption that removes every possible obstacle and makes His mercy universally and practically accessible to all who will flee to it. “For the needy shall not alway be forgotten: the expectation of the poor shall not perish for ever” (Psalm 9:18, KJV). “But thou, O God, shalt bring them down into the pit of destruction: bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days; but I will trust in thee” (Psalm 55:23, KJV). “God’s love has provided a refuge for the sinner, a place of safety from the second death” (Steps to Christ, p. 71, 1892). “In His infinite love, God has opened a way of escape for the sinner, providing a refuge in Christ” (The Great Controversy, p. 533, 1911). What responsibilities arise toward God in light of these concepts?

DUTY TO THE DIVINE!

In response to a love so meticulous and a refuge so complete, my primary responsibility toward God is one of active, urgent, and abiding faith. The provision of a city of refuge was useless to the manslayer who did not run to it; likewise, the refuge of Christ is of no avail to the soul that will not flee to Him. My duty, therefore, is to respond to His provision with my whole being. This involves, first, the urgency of flight—a decisive turning from sin and a casting of myself wholly upon His mercy, without delay or reservation. Second, it requires the diligence of abiding. The fugitive was only safe within the city walls. Sr. White draws the parallel with stark clarity: “The prisoner who at any time went outside the city of refuge was abandoned to the avenger of blood. Even so, it is not enough that the sinner believe in Christ for pardon of sin; he must, by faith and obedience, abide in Him.” (Patriarchs and Prophets, 516). This abiding is a daily consecration, a moment-by-moment reliance on His grace. Finally, my responsibility is to trust the entire process of His sanctuary ministry, from justification at the cross to the final judgment in the Most Holy Place. This means embracing the lifelong journey of sanctification, expressed in the apostle Paul’s deepest desire: “That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death; If by any means I might attain unto the resurrection of the dead.” (Philippians 3:10-11, KJV). My responsibility is not to earn my salvation, but to actively live within the safety He has already provided, trusting Him to complete the work He has begun. “But I have trusted in thy mercy; my heart shall rejoice in thy salvation” (Psalm 13:5, KJV). “Commit thy way unto the Lord; trust also in him; and he shall bring it to pass” (Psalm 37:5, KJV). “The prisoner who at any time went outside the city of refuge was abandoned to the avenger of blood. Even so, it is not enough that the sinner believe in Christ for pardon of sin; he must, by faith and obedience, abide in Him” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 516, 1890). “The church is God’s appointed agency for the salvation of men. It was organized for service, and its mission is to carry the gospel to the world. From the beginning it has been God’s plan that through His church shall be reflected to the world His fullness and His sufficiency” (The Acts of the Apostles, p. 9, 1911). What responsibilities arise toward our neighbor in light of these concepts?

AIDING OUR NEIGHBORS!

My responsibility toward my neighbor is to become a living signpost on the road to refuge. If God took such care to ensure the paths to the ancient cities were clear and well-maintained, how much more must I, as part of His church, ensure the path to Christ is free from the debris of human invention and hypocrisy? My duty is to embody the principles of the sanctuary—mercy, justice, and accessible grace—in all my interactions. The church is God’s spiritual building on earth, and we are its living stones. As Paul wrote, we “are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.” (Ephesians 2:20-22, KJV). This makes our collective responsibility immense. We are to be a habitation of God, a place where His character is revealed. This is the core of our mission. Sr. White states, “The church is God’s appointed agency for the salvation of men. It was organized for service, and its mission is to carry the gospel to the world. From the beginning it has been God’s plan that through His church shall be reflected to the world His fullness and His sufficiency.” (The Acts of the Apostles, 9). Therefore, my responsibility to my neighbor is to participate in building a church community that is a true haven—a place as accessible, safe, and clearly marked as the cities of refuge God designed. It means I must engage in spiritual “road maintenance,” removing the stones of prejudice, the thorns of gossip, and the dust of indifference, so that any fleeing, desperate soul can find a clear and welcoming path to the ultimate safety found only in Jesus Christ. “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself” (Leviticus 19:18, KJV). “Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ” (Galatians 6:2, KJV). “The church is the channel of God’s purpose to communicate His grace to the world” (The Acts of the Apostles, p. 13, 1911). “Through the church, God designs to manifest His wisdom, His power, and His glory, to the principalities and powers in heavenly places” (Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 8, p. 15, 1904). How do we translate ancient blueprints into living reality?

DEEP REFLECTIONS!

As we, the bearers of this profound message, step out into a world of confusion and pain, how do we translate these ancient blueprints into a living reality? How do we speak of a literal sanctuary to a generation taught to see all such things as myth? We must do so with the gentle confidence of those who have, by faith, entered its courts. We can explain that just as a blueprint for a house is not the house itself but proves the house is real, so the earthly tabernacle was the divine blueprint proving the reality of the heavenly. When we meet a soul who feels pursued by the “avenger” of a guilty past, we can paint for them the vivid picture of the fugitive, heart pounding, feet bleeding, straining for the gates of Hebron. We can tell them that a refuge just as real, and infinitely more secure, is available to them right now in Christ, and the road to it is as near as a simple prayer of surrender. This then turns the question inward upon us and our own communities. We must ask ourselves the hard questions. Do I truly believe in a literal sanctuary where Christ is pleading my case at this very moment, or is it just a correct but distant theory to me? How does the reality of a living, risen High Priest change the way I pray today, right now? Let us look at our local churches, the modern gateways to the city of refuge. What “rocks” of cold tradition or “thorns” of internal strife might be littering the path, tripping up sincere seekers before they can even reach the gate? Are we actively engaged in “road maintenance”—welcoming new people with genuine warmth, simplifying our language to make the deep truths of God accessible, and practicing the radical forgiveness that the sanctuary represents? Let us each ask: Is my life, is our church, a clear signpost pointing to Jesus, or a confusing crossroads that leaves the weary traveler more lost than before? The call is for us to be more than just residents of the city; we are called to be its gatekeepers, its road-builders, its living invitations. “Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves” (2 Corinthians 13:5, KJV). “Search me, O God, and know my heart: try me, and know my thoughts” (Psalm 139:23, KJV). “The resurrection of Lazarus was a most striking evidence of Christ’s power to raise the dead” (The Desire of Ages, p. 536, 1898). “By raising Lazarus from the dead, Christ declared Himself the Resurrection and the Life” (The Great Controversy, p. 524, 1911). What assurance does the sanctuary doctrine provide in the great controversy?

VICTORY ASSURED!

In the grand tapestry of the great controversy, the sanctuary doctrine is the golden thread that weaves everything together. It is God’s comprehensive answer to the accusations of Satan and the despair of the human heart. The sanctuary is real, a literal place of governance and grace, proving that God is not an absentee landlord but an engaged Sovereign. The refuge in Christ is accessible, prefigured by cities meticulously placed so that none could say mercy was beyond their reach. And the resurrection is the guarantee, the divine power source that animates the entire plan, ensuring that our High Priest is not a dead martyr but a living, all-powerful Intercessor. This beautiful, interconnected system demonstrates a God of infinite wisdom, meticulous justice, and unfathomable love. It is a system designed not to condemn, but to save; not to confuse, but to clarify. As we stand in the light of this truth, we can have absolute assurance. The way has been prepared, the price has been paid, the Priest has entered within the veil, and the refuge is secure. Our part is simply to heed the call, to flee to the safety of His embrace, and to abide there, secure in the ministry of our risen Lord until the day He steps out from the sanctuary to take us home. “And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son” (1 John 5:11, KJV). “These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God” (1 John 5:13, KJV). “The sanctuary in heaven is the very center of Christ’s work in behalf of men. It concerns every soul living upon the earth” (The Great Controversy, p. 488, 1911). “The correct understanding of the ministration in the heavenly sanctuary is the foundation of our faith” (Evangelism, p. 221, 1906).

“For ye shall go out with joy, and be led forth with peace: the mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into singing, and all the trees of the field shall clap their hands. Instead of the thorn shall come up the fir tree, and instead of the brier shall come up the myrtle tree: and it shall be to the Lord for a name, for an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off” (Isaiah 55:12-13, KJV).

If you have a prayer request, please leave it in the comments below. Prayer meetings are held on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. To join, enter your email address in the comments section.


Leave a comment