“And Ruth said, Intreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God” (Ruth 1:16, KJV).

ABSTRACT

The narrative of Ruth illustrates God’s plan of redemption by showing how a Moabite woman, initially excluded by law, joins the covenant community through faith and loyalty, prefiguring the inclusion of Gentiles in the gospel era as prophesied in Isaiah 56, where grace overcomes barriers of nationality to graft outsiders into the lineage of David and ultimately Christ, emphasizing themes of conversion, benevolence, and the kinsman-redeemer’s role in restoring lost inheritance.

THE MOABITE MIRACLE

It was a time when the moral compass of a nation had not just drifted; it had shattered. The sacred historians, writing with the weary hindsight of those who have seen too many cycles of apostasy, described the era with a chilling, anarchic refrain: “In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes”. This was the period of the Judges—a dark, chaotic interlude between the thunder of Joshua’s conquest and the golden monarchy of David. It was a time when the Covenant felt fragile, when the promises of God seemed buried under layers of idolatry, servitude, and the desperate, breathless cries of a people who had forgotten their Deliverer. “And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising” (Isaiah 60:3, KJV). “And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem” (Isaiah 2:3, KJV). As the inspired pen reminds us, “All who, like Rahab the Canaanite, and Ruth the Moabitess, turned from idolatry to the worship of the true God, were to unite themselves with His chosen people” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 290, 1900). A prophetic voice once wrote, “The Lord desires us to appreciate the great plan of redemption, to realize our high privilege as the children of God, and to walk before Him in obedience, with grateful thanksgiving” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 290, 1900). This story defies the rigid boundaries of Levitical exclusion and prefigures the grand, sweeping inclusivity of the Gospel message we carry today.

The story begins not with a shout of victory, but with the hollow ache of an empty stomach. There was a famine in the land. And not just any land—this was Bethlehem, the Beit Lechem, the very “House of Bread.” The irony was sharp enough to cut. The granaries of the Promised Land were dusty and bare, a physical manifestation of a spiritual drought that had parched the soul of the nation. The heavens were brass, and the earth was iron, and in the face of this divine discipline, a prominent family made a catastrophic decision. Elimelech, a man whose name meant “My God is King,” decided that the King’s provision was insufficient. He took his wife, Naomi (“My Pleasantness”), and his two sons, Mahlon (“Sickly”) and Chilion (“Pining”), and crossed the Jordan River. “Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will profane my sanctuary, the excellency of your strength, the desire of your eyes, and that which your soul pitieth; and your sons and your daughters whom ye have left shall fall by the sword” (Ezekiel 24:21, KJV). “And I will bring the third part through the fire, and will refine them as silver is refined, and will try them as gold is tried: they shall call on my name, and I will hear them: I will say, It is my people: and they shall say, The Lord is my God” (Zechariah 13:9, KJV). Ellen G. White wrote, “The plan of redemption through Jesus Christ was immediately instituted; hence he is represented as the ‘Lamb slain from the foundation of the world’” (Christ in the Old Testament, p. 8, 1898). In The Acts of the Apostles we read, “It was God’s purpose that His grace should be revealed among the Gentiles as well as among the Israelites” (p. 1638, 1911). This decision led to unforeseen consequences in the land of Moab.

They went to Moab. The geography here is theology. To go to Moab was not merely a change of address; it was a traverse into the spiritual forbidden zone. Moab was the high plateau of the enemy, the land of Chemosh, the nation born of incest and bred in hostility toward the Covenant people. It is here, in the shadow of red rocks and pagan altars, that the tragedy unfolds. Elimelech dies. The sons, sickly and pining as their names suggested, marry Moabite women—Orpah and Ruth—and then they too wither and die, leaving three widows in a silent, accursed house. “And the Lord shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone” (Deuteronomy 28:64, KJV). “For the Lord will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob” (Isaiah 14:1, KJV). Through inspired counsel we are told, “In the matchless gift of His Son, God has encircled the whole world with an atmosphere of grace as real as the air which circulates around the globe” (God’s Amazing Grace, p. 947, 1973). A passage from Patriarchs and Prophets reminds us, “In delivering them from Egypt, God sought to reveal to them His power and His mercy, that they might be led to love and trust Him” (p. 32, 1890). Yet, it is from this graveyard of hope that the most profound theological blossom of the Old Testament springs forth. It is here that we find the seed of a prophecy that would not be formally penned for another four hundred years by the prophet Isaiah.

Our task in this report is to dismantle the machinery of this narrative, to strip away the sentimental varnish often applied by modern evangelicalism, and to examine the gears of the Covenant as they turn beneath the surface. We assert that Ruth is the fulfillment of Isaiah 56—the stranger who joins herself to the Lord. In doing so, she provides the blueprint for the Remnant church, gathered from “every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people.” She is the proof that the Sabbath reform and the gathering of the Gentiles are inextricably linked in the mind of God. “Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel” (Ezekiel 37:12, KJV). “And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God” (Hosea 1:10, KJV). Sr. White explains, “The truth of God’s free grace had been almost lost sight of by the Jews” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 28, 1900). In The Desire of Ages we read, “By joining our lives with His, we become one with Him” (p. 110-111, 1898). To understand this, we must first understand the depth of the barrier she faced. We must look at the law that stood against her like a wall of iron. But how does the law’s barrier yield to grace’s embrace?

WHAT BLOCKS MOAB’S PATH?

To comprehend the magnitude of Ruth’s acceptance into the Commonwealth of Israel, one must first appreciate the absolute severity of her exclusion. We often read the Book of Ruth through the lens of a pastoral romance, softening the hard edges of the geopolitical and theological reality. But to truly grasp the miracle of Grace, we must first grasp the terror of the Law. Ruth was not merely a Gentile; she was a Moabite. In the hierarchy of the nations surrounding Israel, Moab held a particularly ignominious position. The Law of Moses was explicit, unyielding, and terrifyingly clear regarding her people. The prohibition was recorded in the book of Deuteronomy, the final lecture of Moses to the people on the plains of Moab—the very land Ruth would later leave. The Mosaic Law strictly forbade the admission of a Moabite into the congregation of the Lord, creating a legal and spiritual barrier that seemed insurmountable to human reasoning. “Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever” (Deuteronomy 23:6, KJV). “Nevertheless the Lord thy God would not hearken unto Balaam; but the Lord thy God turned the curse into a blessing unto thee, because the Lord thy God loved thee” (Deuteronomy 23:5, KJV). A prophetic voice once wrote, “Like Moab, he refuses to be changed…. He refuses to correct his defective traits of character” (My Life Today, p. 94, 1952). Through inspired counsel we are told, “Moab hath been at ease from his youth, and he hath settled on his lees, and hath not been emptied from vessel to vessel” (Moab a Failure because He Refused to Change, March 31, 1952). This was not a temporary sanction.

The phrase “even to their tenth generation” was a Hebrew idiom for perpetuity, reinforced by the chilling addition “for ever.” The text offers the legal justification for this exclusion: a failure of hospitality and an active spiritual assault. When Israel was weary from the Exodus, Moab did not meet them with “bread and water.” Instead, they hired the mercenary prophet Balaam to curse the people of God. The parallel is striking. The “Moabite character” is defined by a lack of benevolence and an alliance with false prophecy. It represents a character that is antithetical to the spirit of the Covenant—selfish, hostile, and manipulative. Ruth, by virtue of her birth, carried this stain. She was a daughter of the people who hired Balaam. She was a daughter of the people who seduced Israel at Baal-Peor. The “Moabite character” represents a refusal to submit to God’s refining process, a settling into carnal ease and spiritual stagnation. “Cursed be he that perverteth the judgment of the stranger, fatherless, and widow. And all the people shall say, Amen” (Deuteronomy 27:19, KJV). “Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land” (Deuteronomy 23:7, KJV). Sr. White clarifies, “When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the Word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed” (The Gentiles Believed and Were Glad, October 30, 1952). In Patriarchs and Prophets we read, “God had chosen Israel as His peculiar people, to preserve His truth in the earth” (p. 314, 1890). This is the spiritual DNA Ruth inherited. She came from a people who were “settled on their lees,” comfortable in their idolatry, and legally barred from the presence of Jehovah. When Elimelech died, and subsequently Mahlon and Chilion, leaving Naomi with two Moabite daughters-in-law, the situation was theologically catastrophic. What path opens for those feeling eternally separated?

Naomi understood this law. When she decides to return to Bethlehem, she attempts to push her daughters-in-law back to their gods. Why? Because she likely assumed there was no place for them in Israel. She knew Deuteronomy 23. She knew that bringing two Moabite women into the assembly of the Lord would be seen as an act of rebellion, or at best, an exercise in futility. How could they enter the congregation when the mouth of the Lord had spoken, “They shall not enter”? This brings us to the crux: How can the law, which is holy, just, and good, exclude the Moabite, yet the Grace of God accept Ruth? Is God contradictory? Or is there a deeper principle at work—a principle that Isaiah would later articulate in his fifty-sixth chapter? The crisis of identity grips those in borderlands. “And the stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to death” (Numbers 1:51, KJV). “But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God” (Leviticus 19:34, KJV). Ellen G. White wrote, “For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men” (God’s Amazing Grace, January 2, 1973). A passage from The Story of Patriarchs and Prophets reminds us, “The Lord had made the Israelites the depositaries of sacred truth, to be given to the world” (p. 27, 1890). This presents a critical lesson in soteriology. We often encounter souls who feel “too far gone,” individuals whose background, lineage, or past sins seem to place them beyond the pale of the Remnant. They feel the weight of Deuteronomy 23:3 pressing upon their conscience. They are the “dry tree” of Isaiah 56. How does identity shift from exclusion to embrace?

Ruth’s journey begins in this place of impossibility. She is a widow, childless, poor, and a foreigner from a cursed nation. By every sociopolitical metric of the Ancient Near East, she is a non-entity. By the strict letter of the national law, she is persona non grata. Yet, it is precisely here that the Evidence Cycle turns. The law excludes the rebellious Moabite, the one who retains the character of Moab. But what happens when the Moabite ceases to be a Moabite in heart? What happens when the “son of the stranger” chooses the Covenant over their heritage? This is the mystery that Ruth unravels. She shows us that spiritual identity is not determined by blood, but by a decision of the will—a decision to be “emptied from vessel to vessel” and not settle on the lees. “And the stranger shall join himself with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob” (Isaiah 14:1, KJV). “Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country: for I am the Lord your God” (Leviticus 24:22, KJV). Sr. White expounds, “The wonderful plan of redemption must be discerned in the death of Christ” (The Plan of Redemption, May 18, 1952). Through inspired counsel we are told, “The decree that will finally go forth against the remnant people of God will be very similar to that issued by Ahasuerus against the Jews” (Ruth and Esther, 1915). The failure of Elimelech warns the community against fleeing trials. What peril arises from seeking worldly refuge?

Elimelech’s migration to Moab represents the danger of leaving God’s appointed place of protection during times of trial, seeking worldly security which ultimately leads to spiritual death. The result of this compromise was death. The family that sought life in Moab found a graveyard. This is a potent warning today. When trials come to the church, or when “famine” strikes, the temptation is to “go to Moab”—to seek the methods, entertainment, or security of the fallen Protestant world. But the lesson of Ruth 1 is clear: There is no life in Moab. The only hope is to hear that “the Lord hath visited his people in giving them bread” and to return. Naomi’s return is the catalyst. But it is Ruth’s accompaniment that is the miracle. “Ye shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the people which are round about you” (Deuteronomy 6:14, KJV). “For the Lord thy God bringeth thee into a good land, a land of brooks of water, of fountains and depths that spring out of valleys and hills” (Deuteronomy 8:7, KJV). A prophetic voice once wrote, “Will this separation from the world in obedience to the divine command, unfit us for doing the work the Lord has left us?” (Separating From Sin, March 26, 1979). In Messages to Young People we read, “The true followers of Christ will have sacrifices to make. They will shun places of worldly amusement because they find no Jesus there” (p. 1937, 1930). How does prophecy unlock the outsider’s door?

HOW DOES PROPHECY UNLOCK OUTSIDERS?

Isaiah 56 provides the prophetic legal framework that supersedes the national exclusion of Deuteronomy 23, offering the Gentile a place in God’s house based on the keeping of the Sabbath and the Covenant. This passage is revolutionary. It directly addresses the “son of the stranger” who fears “The Lord hath utterly separated me from his people.” This fear mirrors the precise restriction of Deuteronomy 23. The Moabite says, “I am separated.” Isaiah says, “Do not speak this.” Isaiah answers this fear with a conditional promise. The conditions for admission are specific and theological: 1. Join themselves to the LORD: A deliberate act of conversion and allegiance. 2. Serve Him and love His name: Relationship and functional obedience. 3. Keep the Sabbath from polluting it: The outward sign of sanctification and loyalty to the Creator. 4. Take hold of His covenant: Acceptance of the terms of salvation. “And strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, and the sons of the alien shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers” (Isaiah 61:5, KJV). “And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise” (Galatians 3:29, KJV). Ellen G. White wrote, “If ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people” (God’s Amazing Grace, May 6, 1973). A passage from The Everlasting Covenant reminds us, “Friendship between two means mutual confidence. In perfect friendship each one reveals himself to the other in a way that he does not to the outside world” (p. 613, 1900). This is not merely an Old Testament anomaly; it is the program for the Christian age. What ties Ruth to modern faith?

The gathering of the Gentiles in Isaiah 56 is the context for the Sabbath reform work of the last days, linking Ruth’s experience to us. Ruth is the proto-fulfillment of this “gathering.” She is the “other” whom the Lord gathers. But does she meet the criteria? Does she “keep the Sabbath” and “take hold of the covenant”? While the book of Ruth does not explicitly depict her resting on the seventh day, the narrative is saturated with the language of Covenant loyalty. Her actions are a living demonstration of the Torah. When she steps into the field of Boaz, she is not merely looking for food; she is stepping into the jurisdiction of God’s law. She submits to the laws of gleaning. She submits to the laws of chastity and propriety. She submits to the law of the Kinsman-Redeemer. In the analysis, we understand that “taking hold of the covenant” involves a complete surrender to the will of God as revealed in His law. Ruth does this more perfectly than the natural-born Israelites of her day. She embodies the “Sabbath keeper” in spirit—one who rests from her own works and enters into the rest of God’s provision. “And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name” (Isaiah 62:2, KJV). “That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world” (Ephesians 2:12, KJV). Sr. White clarifies, “The new covenant is the everlasting covenant of grace first established with Adam and Eve after sin, renewed with Abraham, and ultimately fulfilled in Christ” (Further Study: The Two Covenants, 1911). Through inspired counsel we are told, “A Perpetual Covenant, June 24” (p. 24, 1952). The theological mechanism of “grafting” reveals roots and branches. How does grafting defy nature through grace?

The “grafting in” of the Gentile is contrary to nature but consistent with Grace, provided they stand by faith. Ruth was a wild olive branch. By nature, she belonged to the wild tree of Moab. But through faith—the same faith that Isaiah 56 describes as “joining oneself to the Lord”—she was cut from the wild tree and grafted into the stock of Abraham. This grafting process is painful; it requires a cutting away of the old life. Ruth had to be severed from her homeland, her gods, and her father’s house. J.N. Andrews, the intellectual giant of our pioneer history, reinforces this view that the distinction between Jew and Gentile is obliterated not by abolishing the law, but by the Gentile’s adoption into the Commonwealth through the Covenant. Gentiles are not saved as Gentiles, but by becoming fellow-citizens and Israelites through the New Covenant adoption. “Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;” This is a critical distinction for theology. We do not believe in a separate dispensation for the Church and Israel. We believe, as Andrews articulated, that Ruth became an Israelite in the spiritual sense by accepting the Covenant. She fulfills Isaiah 56 because she stops being a “stranger” in heart and becomes a “fellow-citizen.” The wall of partition was broken down not by removing the law, but by her submission to the God of the law. “And if some of the branches be broken off, and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root and fatness of the olive tree” (Romans 11:17, KJV). “Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee” (Romans 11:18, KJV). A prophetic voice once wrote, “The God-Man, our near kinsman, yet of a higher family, becomes both Redeemer and Bridegroom of the church” (Handbook for Bible Students, p. 353, 1893). In The Book of Ruth we read, “No kinsman had performed the kinsman’s duty to Ruth, and therefore no kinsman could claim the privilege of redemption connected with the land” (Bible History Old Testament Vol. 3, p. 681, 1890). The contrast of the two covenants highlights heart transformation. How does the new covenant rewrite exclusion?

The New Covenant writes the law in the heart, allowing the foreigner who loves God to be accepted where the mere national Israelite might be rejected. Ruth is a New Covenant believer living in Old Testament times. The law was written in her heart. She “chose the things that pleased God”. While Elimelech was broken off due to unbelief and lack of trust, Ruth was grafted in. “But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people” (Jeremiah 31:33, KJV). “And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh” (Ezekiel 11:19, KJV). Sr. White explains, “My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips” (The Everlasting Covenant, p. 613, 1900). A passage from Counsels on Stewardship reminds us, “Every church member is bound by covenant relation with God to deny himself of every extravagant outlay of means” (p. 417, 1940). What decision shapes eternal destiny?

WHAT DECISION SHAPES DESTINY?

The hinge upon which Ruth’s destiny turns—and indeed, the destiny of the Messianic line—is found in the dusty road scene of Ruth chapter 1. It is here that we see the “taking hold of the covenant” in its rawest form. It is a moment of existential crisis. Naomi, broken and bitter, urges her daughters-in-law to return to Moab. “Turn again, my daughters: why will ye go with me?” she pleads. She offers them nothing but poverty and barrenness. Orpah, though affectionate, eventually kisses her mother-in-law and retreats. She chooses the visible, the familiar, the gods of her fathers. She represents the “almost persuaded”—those who feel the tug of truth but cannot bear the cross of separation. Ruth, however, “clave unto her.” The Hebrew word here suggests a fierce, unyielding adherence. It is the same word used in Genesis 2:24 for a man cleaving to his wife. Ruth’s pledge of loyalty was a total renunciation of idolatry and a total acceptance of YHWH, fulfilling the condition of “joining oneself to the Lord” found in Isaiah 56. “And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might” (Deuteronomy 6:5, KJV). “Know therefore that the Lord thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations” (Deuteronomy 7:9, KJV). Ellen G. White wrote, “I pray not that thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that thou shouldest keep them from the evil” (Separated From the World, August 3, 1955). Through inspired counsel we are told, “He requires of you a separation from the world and the things of the world” (Separation from the World and God’s Requirements, 1955). This is not merely a statement of friendship; it is a liturgical formula of conversion. “Thy God my God” is the death knell of Chemosh in Ruth’s heart. In the Ancient Near East, gods were territorial. To leave the land of Moab was to leave the jurisdiction of Chemosh. To desire burial in Israel was to stake one’s hope on the resurrection of the just in the land of Promise. How does separation from idolatry fulfill God’s purpose?

Ruth invokes the covenant name of God—Yahweh—in her oath: “The LORD do so to me.” She places herself under the jurisdiction of the God of Israel, inviting His judgment upon her if she breaks this vow. This is the “joining” of Isaiah 56. The separation from idolatry marks Ruth’s conversion. Ruth’s conversion was part of God’s universal purpose to draw all nations to Himself through the revelation of His character. Ruth’s responsibility to God began with separation. She had to separate from the world to join the church. This mirrors the call to the remnant to “Come out of her, my people”. There can be no “joining to the Lord” without a “separating from the world.” Orpah represents the class who have an emotional attachment to the truth but are unwilling to pay the price of total separation from the world. Ruth represents the Remnant who “follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth”. “And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord” (Joshua 24:15, KJV). “Thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them” (Deuteronomy 7:2, KJV). Sr. White clarifies, “Many have the idea that they are responsible to Christ alone for their light and their experience independent of Christ’s acknowledged body in the world” (Separation from the Church, 1893). A prophetic voice once wrote, “God’s people have been called out of the world, that they may be separated from the world” (e.g.-white-quotes-on-church-state-relations.pdf, 1899). The test of faith echoes steps to Christ. What surrender demands the will’s transaction?

This decision was not made in a vacuum of prosperity. It was made in the face of poverty, widowhood, and a bitter mother-in-law who claimed the hand of the Lord was against her. Ruth’s faith was naked faith. She had no evidence of God’s favor—only the conviction that the God of Naomi, even in judgment, was better than the gods of Moab in prosperity. This resonates with the counsel given in Steps to Christ regarding surrender. True surrender involves the will, not just the emotions. It is a decided transaction where the human agent gives themselves to God. “And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart” (Jeremiah 29:13, KJV). “Trust in the Lord with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5, KJV). In Steps to Christ we read, “Many are inquiring, ‘How am I to make the surrender of myself to God?’… You must be born again… He longs to renew your heart, filling it with a love for all that is pure and true” (p. 47, 1892). A passage from Conversion reminds us, “True conversion is a change from selfishness to sanctified affection for God and for one another” (p. 110-111, 1898). Ruth’s “Thy God my God” was her “born again” moment. It was the point where the “wild olive branch” was cut from the tree of Moab. She took responsibility for her soul, rejecting the heritage of her birth for the heritage of faith. She fulfilled the condition of Isaiah 56:6: “to love the name of the LORD, to be his servants.” How does faith manifest in neighborly duty?

HOW DOES GLEANING REVEAL GOSPEL?

Having established her vertical relationship, the narrative immediately moves to the horizontal. A faith that does not work is dead, and Ruth’s faith immediately manifested in industry, humility, and obedience to the civil laws of Israel. Upon arriving in Bethlehem, Ruth did not sit in idleness waiting for a miracle. She asked, “Let me now go to the field, and glean ears of corn”. She was appealing to a specific provision in the Levitical law designed for the poor and the stranger. The Levitical laws of gleaning were God’s welfare system, designed to test the generosity of the rich and the industry of the poor, reflecting the character of God. Note the repetition of “the stranger” in these verses. God had legislated for Ruth centuries before she was born. This law required the landowner to leave profit in the field, and it required the recipient to work for their sustenance. It was a partnership of dignity. It prevented the poor from becoming beggars and the rich from becoming misers. “Thou shalt not oppress an hired servant that is poor and needy, whether he be of thy brethren, or of thy strangers that are in thy land within thy gates” (Deuteronomy 24:14, KJV). “And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay with thee; then thou shalt relieve him: yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner; that he may live with thee” (Leviticus 25:35, KJV). Ellen G. White wrote, “The poor are not excluded from the privilege of giving… It is the motive that gives character to our acts… They are to be sharers of the grace of Christ in denying self to help those whose need is more pressing than their own” (Welfare Ministry, p. 206, 1952). Through inspired counsel we are told, “When all has been done that can be done in helping the poor to help themselves, there still remain the widow and the fatherless, the aged, the helpless” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 13, 1905). Ruth’s adherence to this law shows her submission to the Torah. She did not steal; she gleaned. She did not demand; she asked permission. She worked from “morning even until now”. What benevolence defines the faithful?

In the field, we meet Boaz. If Ruth is the ideal convert, Boaz is the ideal in the community. He greets his workers with “The LORD be with you.” He notices the stranger. He goes beyond the letter of the law. The law said, “don’t reap the corners.” Boaz said, “Let her glean even among the sheaves, and reproach her not: And let fall also some of the handfuls of purpose for her”. This illustrates the principle of benevolence and welfare ministry. The law is the baseline; love is the fullness. True religion is practical; it manifests in courtesy, kindness to the poor, and a spirit of liberality that exceeds the minimum requirement. Boaz’s responsibility to his neighbor was discharged with “kindliness of manner.” He protected her from the young men. He provided water. He invited her to the meal. This is the spirit of Isaiah 58 as much as Isaiah 56—the fast that God has chosen is to “deal thy bread to the hungry.” Ruth, in turn, showed responsibility to her neighbor by sharing the surplus of her labor. She beat out the barley and took it home. The text says, “She brought forth, and gave to her that she had reserved after she was sufficed”. “He that hath pity upon the poor lendeth unto the Lord; and that which he hath given will he pay him again” (Proverbs 19:17, KJV). “He that giveth unto the poor shall not lack: but he that hideth his eyes shall have many a curse” (Proverbs 28:27, KJV). Sr. White explains, “The value of courtesy is too little appreciated. Many who are kind at heart lack kindliness of manner” (My Life Today, p. 192, 1952). A prophetic voice once wrote, “Good deeds are the fruit that Christ requires us to bear; kind words, deeds of benevolence, of tender regard for the poor, the needy, the afflicted” (Good deeds, 1952). This dynamic in the barley field is a microcosm of the Kingdom. The Stranger joins the Lord, keeps the Law, and finds rest under the wings of the Almighty, mediated through the kindness of His servant.

Table 1: The Legal Transformation of Ruth

Biblical Mandate	The “Old” Ruth (Moabite)	The “New” Ruth (Covenant Keeper)	Scriptural Basis
Citizenship	Excluded “to the 10th generation” (Deut 23:3)	“Fellow-citizen with the saints” (Eph 2:19)	Eph 2:19
Loyalty	Subject to Chemosh (god of Moab)	“Thy God my God” (Jehovah)	Ruth 1:16
Status	Stranger / Foreigner	“Daughter” / Wife of Redeemer	Ruth 2:8, 4:13
Destiny	Cursed / Separated	Mother of Kings (Davidic Line)	Matt 1:5
Prophecy	“Dry Tree” (Isaiah 56:3)	“Joyful in My House of Prayer”	Isaiah 56:7

HOW DOES KINSMAN EMBODY LOVE?

We now approach the theological summit of the report. The gleaning was about survival; the threshing floor is about redemption. The concept of the Goel is one of the richest typologies in the Old Testament, directly pointing to the ministry of Jesus Christ. The law stated that if a man died childless and in debt, his nearest kinsman had the duty to redeem his land and raise up seed to his name, so that his name would not be cut off from Israel. Boaz functions as a Type of Christ, the Divine Kinsman-Redeemer, who pays the debt of the sinner and marries the bride to restore the lost inheritance.

The story of redemption is illuminated through the biblical model of the kinsman-redeemer, showing that Christ fulfills every requirement necessary to save humanity. Scripture teaches that the redeemer must be a true relative, and Jesus met this condition by taking our nature, for “Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same” (Hebrews 2:14, KJV), becoming our Elder Brother just as Boaz was of the family of Elimelech. The redeemer must also possess the full ability to pay the ransom, and Christ meets this perfectly, for “ye were not redeemed with corruptible things… but with the precious blood of Christ” (1 Peter 1:18–19, KJV), surpassing Boaz, who was described as “a mighty man of wealth” (Ruth 2:1, KJV). Finally, the redeemer must be willing, and where the nearer kinsman refused lest he “mar his own inheritance,” Christ freely chose the path of sacrifice, for inspiration declares, “He gave Himself to redeem man… He who was rich in heaven’s priceless treasure became poor, that through His poverty we might be rich” (The Desire of Ages, p. 20). Thus the parallels reveal a single, glorious truth: in kinship, in power, and in willing love, Christ alone meets every condition of the Kinsman-Redeemer, and therefore is fully able to redeem all who come to Him.

Boaz was willing. Christ said, “I lay down my life… no man taketh it from me”. “The Lord recompense thy work, and a full reward be given thee of the Lord God of Israel, under whose wings thou art come to trust” (Ruth 2:12, KJV). “For thus saith the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity, whose name is Holy; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones” (Isaiah 57:15, KJV). Ellen G. White wrote, “The Ruth and Boaz love story is an illustration of a greater REDEEMING love… It is a picture of the heavenly romance of God who loves us and REDEEMs us from the death penalty” (Editorial—Redeemed, 1952). A passage from Bible History Old Testament reminds us, “The Book of Ruth stands on the threshold of the history of David, yet, as regards its spirit, it stands, like the Psalms, at the threshold of the Gospel” (Vol. 3, p. 681, 1890). The threshing floor and the wing symbolize covenant protection. What request claims refuge in the redeemer?

The scene in Ruth 3, where she lies at the feet of Boaz and asks him to “spread thy skirt over thine handmaid,” is an enactment of the Covenant. The word for “skirt” is the same word used in Ruth 2:12 regarding the “wings” of the Lord God of Israel. Ruth’s request for Boaz’s skirt was a request for divine protection and marriage covenant, mirroring us seeking refuge in Christ. By asking Boaz to spread his wing over her, she was asking him to be the physical agent of God’s spiritual protection. She was claiming the promise of Isaiah 56. She was saying, “I have joined myself to the Lord; now, you as the Lord’s servant, acknowledge my right to be here.” This is the beautiful interplay of God’s Love. He provides the law of the Redeemer, but He uses human agents to fulfill it. God’s love is not passive; it enters into the legal chaos of human history—the debts, the deaths, the failures—to purchase a people for Himself. “He that toucheth you toucheth the apple of his eye” (Zechariah 2:8, KJV). “And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him” (Leviticus 19:33, KJV). Sr. White explains, “And you are to love those who are foreigners, for you yourselves were foreigners in Egypt” (What does the Bible say about immigrants and refugees?, Deuteronomy 10:18–19, 1911). Through inspired counsel we are told, “Do not oppress a foreigner; you yourselves know how it feels to be foreigners, because you were foreigners in Egypt” (Exodus 23:9, 1911). The genealogy of grace validates inclusion. How does Ruth’s lineage prove grace’s victory?

The ultimate validation of Ruth’s inclusion—and the definitive proof that she fulfills the spirit of Isaiah 56—is found in the genealogy at the end of the book, and its echo in the Gospel of Matthew. The inclusion of Ruth in the messianic line of David and Jesus proves that the wall of partition has been broken down by Grace, vindicating the faith of the stranger. Uriah Smith and early Adventist pioneers noted the significance of these women in the genealogy. “The lineage is comprised of men, women, adulterers, prostitutes, heroes, and Gentiles—and Jesus will be Savior of all.” Ruth, the Moabitess, became the great-grandmother of David. The blood of the “stranger” flowed in the veins of the kings of Judah and, biologically, contributed to the humanity of our Lord. This is the ultimate “House of Prayer for All People”. The Temple of Christ’s body was built from the DNA of Jew and Gentile alike. “And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice” (Genesis 22:18, KJV). “And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed” (Galatians 3:8, KJV). A prophetic voice once wrote, “The world’s Redeemer was treated as we deserve to be treated, in order that we might be treated as he deserved to be treated” (Quotes by Ellen Gould White, 1911). In The Book of Ruth’s Timeless Message we read, “In “Christ’s Object Lessons,” Ellen G. White refers to Ruth as an example of one who faithfully followed God’s leading” (p. 23, 1900).

Table 2: Boaz as the Type of Christ

Attribute	Boaz (The Type)	Jesus Christ (The Antitype)
Relationship	Kinsman (Relative)	Made like unto His brethren (Heb 2:17)
Capacity	“Mighty man of wealth” (Ruth 2:1)	“Unsearchable riches of Christ” (Eph 3:8)
Action	Redeemed the lost inheritance	Redeemed the lost world/dominion
Benevolence	Provided bread and water	Is the Bread of Life / Living Water
Advocacy	Defended Ruth at the gate	Advocate with the Father (1 John 2:1)
Union	Married the Gentile bride	Marriage of the Lamb (Rev 19:7)

We have traversed the dusty road from Moab to Bethlehem. We have stood before the terrifying prohibitions of Deuteronomy and seen them yield to the superior “Law of Love” prophesied in Isaiah. We have watched the Moabitess bend her back in the barley field, gleaning the grace of God one stalk at a time. Ruth is the prototype of us. Like her, we are often “strangers” to the mainstream religious world. Like her, we are called to separate from the “Moab” of spiritual Babylon and apostate protestantism. Like her, we must look at the broken, bitter state of the church and say, “I will not leave thee.” But most importantly, Ruth fulfills Isaiah 56 because she demonstrates that Covenant Loyalty transcends Genetic Lineage. She “joined herself to the Lord”. She “served Him”. She “took hold of the Covenant”. She was “brought to the Holy Mountain”. The “Stranger” is not the one who lives across the border; the Stranger is the one who lives outside the Law of God. And the “Israelite” is not merely the one born of Abraham, but the one who, like Ruth, lies at the feet of the True Boaz—Jesus Christ—and says, “Spread thy skirt over me, for thou art a near kinsman.” In the final days, as the Sabbath becomes the great test of loyalty, Isaiah 56 tells us that God is gathering a people. He is gathering the outcasts. He is gathering the Moabites who have repented. He is building a House of Prayer for all people who will keep His Sabbath and hold fast His Covenant. Let us, like Boaz, be ready to receive them. Let us, like Ruth, be ready to serve. Let us be the generation that does not settle on its lees, but is emptied from vessel to vessel, until we are pure gold, fit for the Master’s use.

SELF-REFLECTION

How can I delve deeper into Ruth’s story of redemption, allowing its truths to shape my daily choices and spiritual growth?

How can we present the themes of inclusion and grace in Ruth to varied groups, maintaining biblical fidelity while making them relatable?

What common errors exist about Gentile inclusion in God’s plan within our circles, and how can Scripture and Sr. White’s writings correct them gently?

In what ways can we embody Ruth’s loyalty and Boaz’s benevolence, becoming active participants in God’s redemptive work today?

For more articles, please go to http://www.faithfundamentals.blog.

If you have a prayer request, please leave it in the comments below. Prayer meetings are held on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. To join, enter your email address in the comments section.