Thou shalt have no other gods before me. (Exodus 20:3, KJV)

ABSTRACT

This article delves into the pantheism controversy that emerged in early Adventism, highlighting how a respected leader’s scientific pursuits led to teachings that blurred the distinction between Creator and creation, threatening core doctrines. Through historical accounts, prophetic warnings, and theological analysis, it examines the crisis’s origins, the divine interventions that preserved truth, and the enduring lessons for maintaining faith amid subtle deceptions, underscoring the importance of upholding the personality of God and the sanctuary message against encroaching errors.

THE BATTLE FOR THE LIVING TEMPLE AND THE CRISIS OF THE OMEGA

The winter of 1902 in Battle Creek, Michigan, was not merely a season; it was a judgment. The air, usually crisp with the industrial optimism of a budding American century, was thick with the acrid taste of burning ink and charred history. On the night of December 30, the Review and Herald Publishing Association—the thumping, rhythmic heart of the publishing work—did not just catch fire; it was erased. Witnesses described the blaze as possessing a supernatural fury. The fire marshal, a man accustomed to the physics of combustion, was baffled by the speed of the destruction. He remarked that it was as if the very bricks were soaked in oil. In the ashes lay the molten plates of a book that had not yet been distributed but had already begun to fracture the theological bedrock of a movement: The Living Temple by Dr. John Harvey Kellogg. Unity depends on a vital connection with Christ. Christ, as our High Priest, ministers in the true tabernacle pitched by the Lord, not by man. Scripture reveals that we must worship in spirit and truth, acknowledging God’s distinct personality. In Patriarchs and Prophets we read: “The Scriptures clearly indicate the relation between God and Christ, and they bring to view as clearly the personality and individuality of each” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 34, 1890). Through inspired counsel we are told: “The Lord Jesus Christ, the divine Son of God, existed from eternity, a distinct person, yet one with the Father” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 247, 1958). “I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage” (Exodus 20:2, KJV). “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5, KJV). The crisis serves as a reminder to guard against subtle shifts that undermine foundational truths. To understand the gravity of this crisis, one must step out of the sterile fluorescent lights of modern theology and into the soot-stained streets of Battle Creek. One must smell the smoke. One must feel the tension of a people who believed they were the Remnant, only to find that the “Alpha of deadly heresies” was rising not from Babylon, but from their own ranks. Dr. John Harvey Kellogg was no ordinary antagonist. He was not a drunken apostate shouting from a tavern. He was the golden boy of Adventism. He was the medical genius whose sanitarium was the envy of the world, a man who had shaken hands with presidents and healed the bowels of tycoons. He was the “right arm” of the message. Yet, in his pursuit of a scientific theology, he stumbled into an ancient error, repackaged in physiological language. He began to see God not as the High Priest in the Heavenly Sanctuary, but as a “beneficent presence” in the flower, the tree, and the boot. Revealing His role clearly, Christ intercedes for humanity in the heavenly places. A prophetic voice once wrote: “The Lord Jesus Christ came to dispute the usurpation of Satan in the kingdoms of the world” (The Review and Herald, April 14, 1896). In The Great Controversy we read: “Satan’s rebellion was to be a lesson to the universe through all coming ages—a perpetual testimony to the nature of sin and its terrible results” (The Great Controversy, p. 499, 1911). “Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ” (Colossians 2:8, KJV). “For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him” (Colossians 1:16, KJV). The incident underscores the peril of blending divine truth with human speculation. This report is exhaustive. It is a forensic audit of a spiritual crime. We will walk through to understand how a misinterpretation of “God in nature” led to a theological catastrophe. We will examine the letters of Ellen G. White, who saw in this intellectual drift a terrifying iceberg that threatened to sink the ship of Zion. And we will look forward, trembling as she did, toward the “Omega.” What lured a staunch creationist into error?

ORIGIN STORY: HOW DID VITALISM SEDUCE?

To understand how a man like Kellogg—a staunch creationist and Sabbath keeper—could drift into pantheism, we must understand the era. The late 19th century was a time of scientific intoxication. The microscope was revealing a universe of complexity within the cell. “Vitalism”—the idea that a “life force” animated living things—was a popular scientific philosophy. Kellogg, a man of science, was trying to bridge the gap between the Bible and the laboratory. He wanted to prove that the laws of health were not just good advice, but divine imperatives. In doing so, he made a fatal error: he confused the Life Giver with the life. Scripture reveals that God sustains all things by His powerful word. The inspired pen notes: “God is the fountain of life; and we can have life only as we are in communion with Him” (Thoughts from the Mount of Blessing, p. 130, 1896). A passage from Education reminds us: “The physical as well as the religious training practiced in the schools of Israel may be profitably studied” (Education, p. 33, 1903). “Thou, even thou, art Lord alone; thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and thou preservest them all; and the host of heaven worshippeth thee” (Nehemiah 9:6, KJV). “For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring” (Acts 17:28, KJV). The era’s intellectual currents highlight the risk of prioritizing science over scripture. What planted the seed of controversy?

WHAT PLANTED THE SEED OF CONTROVERSY?

The controversy did not begin with the fire in 1902. It began five years earlier, in the freezing cold of Lincoln, Nebraska. The 1897 General Conference Session was underway, and Dr. Kellogg took the podium to deliver a series of talks titled “God in Man”. To the casual listener, Kellogg’s words sounded like a profound deepening of spiritual intimacy. He argued against a distant, clockmaker God. He mocked the idea of a “Deity that is everywhere in general and nowhere in particular, floating around through space”. Instead, he proposed a God who was intimately involved in the physiological processes of life. “When I reach out my arm, and draw it in, there is a creation,” Kellogg told the delegates. “God is creating in my arm the power with which I use my arm”. It was seductive. It made God immediate. It made every heartbeat a divine act. But beneath the surface, a subtle shift was occurring. By locating God’s person within the mechanism of the human body and nature, Kellogg was beginning to dissolve the distinction between the Creator and the creature. He was moving God from the Throne to the tissue. Christ, as our High Priest, ministers in the true tabernacle pitched by the Lord, not by man. Through inspired counsel we are told: “The personality of the Father and the Son, also the unity that exists between Them, are presented in the seventeenth chapter of John, in the prayer of Christ for His disciples” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 36, 1890). A prophetic voice once wrote: “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (Genesis 1:1, KJV), emphasizing divine separation from creation. “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (Genesis 1:1, KJV). “Thus saith the Lord that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the Lord; and there is none else” (Isaiah 45:18, KJV). The talks reveal how appealing ideas can mask dangerous shifts. Who amplified the emerging storm?

WHO AMPLIFIED THE EMERGING STORM?

Kellogg was not working in a vacuum. Elder E.J. Waggoner, a hero of the 1888 Minneapolis conference and a champion of righteousness by faith, was singing from the same hymn sheet. Waggoner, a man of immense intellect, had begun to drift toward a mystical understanding of the gospel. At the same 1897 conference, Waggoner declared, “The Lord Jesus is in everything that He has made… It is the personal, powerful presence of God that keeps the mountains together… God is there with His personal power”. Waggoner went further in 1899, arguing that if Christ is in us, we should have the same “life” that He has, implying a physical immortality or immunity to disease was possible for the community. The logic was intoxicating: If God is Life, and God is in me perfectly, then I am Life. This synergy between the medical leader (Kellogg) and the theological leader (Waggoner) created a “perfect storm.” The medical work gave the pantheism a scientific veneer (“This is physiology!”), while the theological wing gave it a spiritual veneer (“This is righteousness by faith!”). Revealing His role clearly, Christ embodies perfect unity with the Father. In The Desire of Ages we read: “From eternal ages it was God’s purpose that every created being, from the bright and holy seraph to man, should be a temple for the indwelling of the Creator” (The Desire of Ages, p. 161, 1898). A passage from Testimonies for the Church reminds us: “The Lord Jesus Christ is God manifest in the flesh” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 6, p. 63, 1901). “That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me” (John 17:21, KJV). “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature” (Galatians 6:15, KJV). The collaboration illustrates the power of combined influences in spreading error. How did early interpretations twist facts?

HOW DID EARLY INTERPRETATIONS TWIST FACTS?

The Bible states, “In him we live, and move, and have our being” (Acts 17:28). Science also shows that a hidden power holds atoms together and sustains life. Kellogg and Waggoner took this sustaining power and treated it as the literal substance of God. They blended God’s active power with God’s actual essence, confusing the Holy Spirit’s work with God’s physical being. Their reasoning led to the belief that God is not only upholding creation but is the physical cohesion of creation itself. In this view, God becomes the “material” of the universe. This mistake would later undermine and destroy the entire Sanctuary doctrine. Scripture reveals that creation declares God’s glory without equating Him to it. The inspired pen notes: “The hand that sustains the worlds in space, the hand that holds in their orderly arrangement and tireless activity all things throughout the universe of God, is the hand that was nailed to the cross for us” (Education, p. 132, 1903). Through inspired counsel we are told: “God speaks to us in His word. Here we have in clearer lines the revelation of His character, of His dealings with men, and the great work of redemption” (Steps to Christ, p. 87, 1892). “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork” (Psalm 19:1, KJV). “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse” (Romans 1:20, KJV). The phase demonstrates how misinterpretation breeds doctrinal peril. What defied divine intervention?

THE LIVING TEMPLE: WHAT DEFIED DIVINE INTERVENTION?

The book The Living Temple became a crisis point. When the Review and Herald burned in 1902, the printing plates for the book were destroyed. Ellen White understood this as God’s mercy, stopping its spread. Kellogg saw it only as an obstacle. In open defiance, he took the manuscript to a secular printer in Battle Creek and paid for 3,000 copies himself. He was determined to publish what he believed was “new light,” even if he had to force it into print. The book appeared to be a simple guide on physiology, hygiene, and diet. It included diagrams of the digestive system, advice on chewing, and even “chewing songs.” But beneath these health teachings ran a strong pantheistic message. It was a Trojan Horse. People opened it for health reform, but a new theology came with it. This shift clashed directly with the truth that Christ serves as our High Priest in the heavenly sanctuary built by God, not by human hands. A prophetic voice once wrote: “The theories of living temple were insidious and dangerous, leading to the destruction of the personality of God” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 203, 1958). In Patriarchs and Prophets we read: “Satan’s policy in this final conflict with God’s people is the same that he employed in the opening of the great controversy in heaven” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 688, 1890). “And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die” (Genesis 3:4, KJV). “For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Genesis 3:5, KJV). The defiance shows the persistence of error despite warnings. What exposed the danger in metaphors?

WHAT EXPOSED THE DANGER IN METAPHORS?

The “Boot” and the “Flower”. The most infamous analogy in the book—and the one that Sr. White and others seized upon as proof of its danger—was the parable of the boot. On page 29 of The Living Temple, Kellogg wrote: “Suppose now we have a boot before us—not an ordinary boot, but a living boot, and as we look at it, we see little boots crowding out at the seams… scores, hundreds, thousands of boots… would we not be compelled to say, ‘There is a shoemaker in the boot’? So there is present in the tree a power which creates and maintains it, a tree-maker in the tree, a flower-maker in the flower…”. It sounds whimsical. There is a shoemaker in the boot! But the theological implications were devastating. If the “tree-maker” is in the tree, then the tree becomes an object of divinity. It is no longer a creation pointing to a Creator; it is a container of the Creator. Kellogg went further. He argued that gravity was not just a physical law but the direct manifestation of God. “The same God was God of the Bible and nature,” he claimed. He suggested that the laws of health were as binding as the Decalogue because the biological functions were God in action. Sr. White saw through the metaphor. She realized that if you follow this logic to its end, you destroy the personality of God. If God is the “shoe-maker in the boot,” He is confined to His creation. He ceases to be the Sovereign Lord of the Universe and becomes a captive energy source. “In Living Temple the assertion is made that God is in the flower, in the leaf, in the sinner,” Sr. White later recounted. “But God does not live in the sinner. The Word declares that He abides only in the hearts of those who love Him and do righteousness”. Revealing His role clearly, God remains distinct from His creation. A passage from The Ministry of Healing reminds us: “Nature is not God, nor was it ever God” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 413, 1905). Through inspired counsel we are told: “God is to us the great Physician for the sin-sick soul” (Medical Ministry, p. 12, 1932). “For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen” (Romans 11:36, KJV). “O Lord, how manifold are thy works! in wisdom hast thou made them all: the earth is full of thy riches” (Psalm 104:24, KJV). The analogies unveil the subtle idolatry in pantheism. How did gravity become insidious?

HOW DID GRAVITY BECOME INSIDIOUS?

The treatment of gravity in The Living Temple showed how serious the problem had become. By equating gravity with the presence of God, Kellogg reduced God to a physical force. Gravity acts the same on everyone. It pulls a good person and a wicked person off a cliff with equal strength. If gravity is God, then God becomes an impersonal, amoral force. He is no longer the “Holy One of Israel” but simply a power of nature. This thinking opened the door to a religion in which “tuning in” to natural forces replaced obedience to the moral law of God. Scripture reveals that God’s laws reflect His character. The inspired pen notes: “The law of God is as sacred as God Himself. It is a revelation of His will, a transcript of His character” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 305, 1900). A prophetic voice once wrote: “The law of God, enshrined within the ark, was the great rule of righteousness and judgment” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 365, 1890). “For all thy commandments are righteousness” (Psalm 119:172, KJV). “The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple” (Psalm 19:7, KJV). The equation exposes the moral vacuum in such views. What vision signaled the counterstrike?

MEANWHILE AT ELMSHAVEN: WHAT VISION SIGNALED THE COUNTERSTRIKE?

The crisis reached its peak in 1904. While at Elmshaven, Ellen White received a vision that became one of the most well-known in Adventist history. She saw a stately ship sailing through the night. The lookout suddenly shouted, “Iceberg ahead!” A massive iceberg rose before the vessel. This iceberg represented the pantheistic heresy. The command to “Meet it!” was God’s instruction to confront Kellogg’s teachings directly. There could be no compromise or soft approach. The foundation of the church was in danger. The true focus had to remain firm: Christ is our High Priest, serving in the heavenly sanctuary built by God, not by human hands. In The Great Controversy we read that “Satan is striving continually to bring in fanciful suppositions in regard to the sanctuary, degrading the wonderful representations of God and the ministry of Christ for our salvation into something that suits the carnal mind” (The Great Controversy, p. 488, 1911). A passage from Testimonies for the Church reminds us that “God bids us fill the mind with great thoughts, pure thoughts” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 8, p. 322, 1904). “Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:25, KJV). “But Christ being come an high priest of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this building” (Hebrews 9:11, KJV). The vision calls for bold confrontation of falsehood. What defined alpha and omega?

WHAT DEFINED ALPHA AND OMEGA?

Ellen White introduced the terms “Alpha” and “Omega” in the middle of this crisis. She warned that many would leave the faith by accepting deceptive teachings. She said the alpha of these errors was already present and identified it plainly: The Living Temple contained “the alpha of deadly heresies.” It was called the “Alpha” because it was the beginning—the first step in a sequence of apostasy. It started with a quiet change in how God’s nature was defined. She warned that an “Omega” would follow and that it would be accepted by those who ignored the warning of the Alpha. She described this coming danger as a false “reformation” that would overturn the core truths God gave His people. She wrote that the foundations of faith would be discarded, the religion of the church would be changed, new books would promote new ideas, and a human-centered philosophy would take the place of Bible truth. This outline matches the later shift in the corporate church—moving away from the pillars of Adventism, embracing worldly standards, and weakening the Sanctuary message. The Alpha was Kellogg’s pantheism. The Omega is the final surrender to the world’s philosophies. Through all this, God continues to preserve His truth despite every deception. Through inspired counsel we are told: “Living Temple contains the alpha of these theories. I knew that the omega would follow in a little while; and I trembled for our people” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 203, 1958). A prophetic voice once wrote: “The track of truth lies close beside the track of error, and both tracks may seem to be one to minds which are not worked by the Holy Spirit” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 202, 1958). “Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1, KJV). “Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils” (1 Timothy 4:1, KJV). The terms warn of escalating apostasy. What revealed heartfelt grief?

WHAT REVEALED HEARTFELT GRIEF?

Ellen White’s letters to Kellogg during this crisis are deeply moving. They do not show the anger of a rival but the sorrow of someone watching a friend lose his way. In Letter 300, 1903, she told him, “You are not sound in the truth… You are not sound in the faith… You have virtually destroyed the Lord God Himself.” This was a serious warning. By redefining God as an impersonal force spread through nature, Kellogg had taken away the personal Father who loves, listens, and saves. He replaced the living “I AM” with an impersonal “it is.” In Letter 303, 1903, she warned him of the “father of lies” who was blinding him. She spoke of the “cross of Christ” and the need for humility, contrasting it with Kellogg’s “self-exaltation”. She saw that Kellogg’s pantheism was actually a form of self-worship. If God is in the boot, and I am wearing the boot, and God is in me, then I am God. This is the original lie of the Serpent: “Ye shall be as gods” (Genesis 3:5). In Letter 52, 1903, she admonished him: “My brother, your work is to understand why the displeasure of God came upon the Sanitarium… God would have you a thoroughly converted man”. She was referring to the fires. The destruction of the Sanitarium and the Publishing House were not random events; they were the “displeasure of God.” Scripture reveals that pride precedes destruction. In The Desire of Ages we read: “Pride in its manifold forms—self-esteem, self-confidence, self-righteousness—prevents the needed work of preparation” (The Desire of Ages, p. 280, 1898). A passage from Patriarchs and Prophets reminds us: “Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18, KJV). “Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall” (Proverbs 16:18, KJV). “Every one that is proud in heart is an abomination to the Lord: though hand join in hand, he shall not be unpunished” (Proverbs 16:5, KJV). The letters emphasize correction rooted in love. How did the cycle dismantle error?

THE EVIDENCE CYCLE RELOADED: HOW DID THE CYCLE DISMANTLE ERROR?

The Pantheism Controversy can be examined through the following phases:

Phase 1: Kellogg based his ideas on two sources:

1. Scripture: He quoted texts like “God is love” (1 John 4:8) and “Do not I fill heaven and earth?” (Jeremiah 23:24), using God’s omnipresence as his foundation.
2. Nature and Science: He pointed to the complexity of living systems, the movements of plants toward the sun, and the laws of physics such as gravity.

Phase 2: The Interpretation (The Filter)
This is where the error began. The Evidence Cycle requires that data be interpreted through the full body of truth—Scripture and the Spirit of Prophecy. Instead, Kellogg interpreted his data through modern scientific ideas and what he believed was “new light.”

The key mistakes were these:

• Theological Confusion: He mixed up God’s omnipresence—His ability to be present everywhere by His Spirit—with pantheism, the belief that God’s substance is everything.
• Misuse of the Trinity: Kellogg claimed to believe in the Trinity, but he redefined it. He said that the Holy Spirit, not the Father, filled all space and every living thing, turning the Holy Spirit into an impersonal force rather than a divine Person.

Phase 3: The Conclusion (The Doctrine)
Here is where the false doctrine emerged.

Result: This “intellectual philosophy” removed the Sanctuary message, undermined the Atonement, and distorted the personality of God.

Sr. White identified this conclusion immediately. “I knew that the omega would follow in a little while; and I trembled for our people,” she wrote. She saw that if you accept the premise (God is the essence of nature), you must accept the conclusion (there is no distinct God to judge or save). Christ, as our High Priest, ministers in the true tabernacle pitched by the Lord, not by man. Through inspired counsel we are told: “The sanctuary in heaven is the very center of Christ’s work in behalf of men” (The Great Controversy, p. 488, 1911). A prophetic voice once wrote: “The subject of the sanctuary was the key which unlocked the mystery of the disappointment of 1844” (The Great Controversy, p. 423, 1911). “Now of the things which we have spoken this is the sum: We have such an high priest, who is set on the right hand of the throne of the Majesty in the heavens” (Hebrews 8:1, KJV). “A minister of the sanctuary, and of the true tabernacle, which the Lord pitched, and not man” (Hebrews 8:2, KJV). The deconstruction affirms the need for biblical interpretation. What battled personality versus essence?

Conclusion: If God is in every person as a substance, then the human body becomes the only true temple. The heavenly Sanctuary becomes symbolic or unnecessary.

THEOLOGY WARS: WHAT BATTLED PERSONALITY VERSUS ESSENCE?

The heart of this controversy was the question of the “Personality of God.” This was not an abstract debate. It was the difference between having a heavenly Father or viewing God as an impersonal power source. Scripture presents God as a real, personal Being who is separate from His creation. He stands over it, not in it. Jeremiah 10:10 (KJV): “But the LORD is the true God, he is the living God, and an everlasting king.” The King is not the Kingdom. Hebrews 1:3 (KJV): “Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person…” The Greek word hypostasis implies a distinct underlying substance or personhood, not a nebulous cloud. Psalm 11:4 (KJV): “The LORD is in his holy temple, the LORD’S throne is in heaven.” He has a location. He is not “floating around through space” as Kellogg mocked, but He is seated in authority. Scripture reveals that God possesses personal attributes. The inspired pen notes: “God is a spirit; yet He is a personal being; for so He has revealed Himself” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 413, 1905). In Education we read: “The mighty power that works through all nature and sustains all things is not, as some men of science claim, merely an all-pervading principle, an actuating energy” (Education, p. 99, 1903). “God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24, KJV). “To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him?” (Isaiah 40:18, KJV). The presentation safeguards against impersonal conceptions. What distinguished nature’s role?

WHAT DISTINGUISHED NATURE’S ROLE?

Sr. White was emphatic: “Nature is not God. The things of nature are God’s handiwork… but nature is not God”. She used the analogy of the artist and the painting. The painting reveals the skill of the artist, but the artist is not in the canvas. If you slash the canvas, you do not bleed the artist. Kellogg’s theory suggested that God was the paint itself. Revealing His role clearly, God uses nature as a revelation, not an embodiment. A passage from Steps to Christ reminds us: “Nature and revelation alike testify of God’s love” (Steps to Christ, p. 9, 1892). Through inspired counsel we are told: “The book of nature is a great lesson book, which in connection with the Scriptures we are to use in teaching others of His character” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 24, 1900). “And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good” (Genesis 1:31, KJV). “For the earth bringeth forth fruit of herself; first the blade, then the ear, after that the full corn in the ear” (Mark 4:28, KJV). The distinction prevents idolatrous confusion. Is the Holy Spirit person or force?

IS THE HOLY SPIRIT PERSON OR FORCE?

Kellogg’s attempt to save his theory by claiming it was the Holy Spirit who was “in the flower” also failed the biblical test. Sr. White and the Bible teach that the Holy Spirit is the “Third Person of the Godhead”. A Person has a will, a mind, and a character. A “force” like gravity has no will; it just pulls. By reducing the Spirit to a biological force that grows trees and digests food, Kellogg depersonalized the Comforter. Scripture reveals that the Holy Spirit possesses personal attributes. The inspired pen notes: “The Holy Spirit has a personality, else He could not bear witness to our spirits and with our spirits that we are the children of God” (Evangelism, p. 617, 1946). A prophetic voice once wrote: “We need to realize that the Holy Spirit, who is as much a person as God is a person, is walking through these grounds” (Evangelism, p. 616, 1946). “And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment” (John 16:8, KJV). “Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come” (John 16:13, KJV). The test affirms the Spirit’s personhood. What divided biblical truth from error?

WHAT DIVIDED BIBLICAL TRUTH FROM ERROR?

Table 1: The Great Divide. DoctrineThe Biblical Truth

Doctrine	The Biblical Truth (SDARM)	The Pantheistic Error (Kellogg/Alpha)
Nature of God	A Personal Being with form and location.	An impersonal essence/force pervading all things.
God’s Location	Seated on the Throne in the Heavenly Sanctuary.	“Everywhere in general, nowhere in particular.”
Creation	God made nature and sustains it by His word.	God is the energy within nature (Shoemaker in the boot).
The Temple	The literal Sanctuary in Heaven (Heb 8:1-2).	The human body / The universe itself.
Salvation	Mediation of Christ’s blood in the Sanctuary.	Realization of the divine presence within oneself.
Holy Spirit	The Third Person of the Godhead.	A universal “fluid” or force of gravity/life.

What responsibility accompanied power?

WITH GREAT POWER COMES GREAT RESPONSIBILITY: WHAT RESPONSIBILITY ACCOMPANIED POWER? (ISAIAH 58)

Kellogg’s defense was often practical. He argued, “I am doing the work! I am feeding the poor! I am healing the sick! Is this not God?” He often cited his “Medical Missionary Work” as the ultimate proof of his theology. He called it the “right arm” of the message. The Right Arm vs. The Head. Sr. White agreed that medical missionary work was the “right arm”. But she made a crucial anatomical observation: The arm must be connected to the body, and controlled by the head. Kellogg was trying to make the arm the whole body. He was prioritizing the social gospel (feeding the body) over the eternal gospel (saving the soul through the Sanctuary message).

Kellogg loved Isaiah 58, the chapter about the “fast” God has chosen—to loose the bands of wickedness and deal bread to the hungry. “Is not this the fast that I have chosen? to loose the bands of wickedness… to deal thy bread to the hungry… and that thou bring the poor that are cast out to thy house?” (Isaiah 58:6-7, KJV). Sr. White championed this chapter as well. She wrote, “The work of the gospel is to be united with the medical missionary work”. However, the divergence was in the motivation.

1. Kellogg’s View: We serve the poor because God is in them. Serving the poor is serving God directly because the poor man is a “living temple” of divinity.
2. The Biblical View: We serve the poor because of our responsibility to God. We love our neighbor because God loved us first.

We see the “image of God” in man, but we do not see God Himself as the man. In Letter 52, 1903, Sr. White chided Kellogg: “My brother, your work is to understand why the displeasure of God came upon the Sanitarium… God would have you a thoroughly converted man”. She was telling him that all the surgeries and soup kitchens in the world could not atone for a theology that destroyed the Lawgiver. Humanitarianism without the Sanctuary is just “making the world a more comfortable place to go to hell from.” Revealing His role clearly, Christ calls for integrated service. Through inspired counsel we are told: “Medical missionary work is the pioneer work of the gospel” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 144, 1905). A prophetic voice once wrote: “The union of Christlike work for the body and Christlike work for the soul is the true interpretation of the gospel” (Welfare Ministry, p. 33, 1952). “For even the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45, KJV). “And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me” (Matthew 25:40, KJV). The chapter stresses balanced motivation. How did the controversy address diverse faiths?

ADDRESSING THE WORLD: HOW DID THE CONTROVERSY ADDRESS DIVERSE FAITHS?

The Pantheism Controversy is not just an internal Adventist squabble. It touches on the fundamental way humanity relates to the Divine.

1. To the Jew. The God of John Harvey Kellogg is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. The God of the Torah is the “I AM,” a distinct Lawgiver who speaks from the mountain, not as the mountain. Deuteronomy 4:12 (KJV): “And the LORD spake unto you out of the midst of the fire: ye heard the voice of the words, but saw no similitude; only ye heard a voice.” The distinction between the Voice and the Fire is the essence of Jewish monotheism. Pantheism dissolves the Covenant, for a Covenant requires two distinct parties. You cannot make a covenant with yourself.
2. To the Christian. Pantheism negates the Atonement. This is the crux of Sr. White’s fear. If God is in everything, then God is in the sinner. If God is in the sinner, then the sinner is naturally divine. If the sinner is divine, he does not need a Mediator. He does not need the Blood. He only needs “enlightenment” to realize his own godhood. 1 Timothy 2:5 (KJV): “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” Kellogg’s theology removes the Mediator. It is the ultimate anti-Christ (“in place of Christ”) theology.
3. To the Secular Mind. Kellogg’s view appeals to the modern ecologist or New Age thinker. It feels “spiritual” without being “religious.” It allows one to worship the forest on Sabbath rather than go to church. It is the “Spirituality of the Nones.” But it is a trap. It offers a feeling of connection without the reality of redemption. It gives you the “boot” but denies you the “Shoemaker.” Scripture reveals that true worship demands distinction. The inspired pen notes: “The Lord is a jealous God, and He will not be trifled with” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 84, 1882). In The Great Controversy we read: “The Bible recognizes no such thing as a development of man from lower forms” (The Great Controversy, p. 551, 1911). “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Deuteronomy 6:4, KJV). “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3, KJV). The messages bridge universal relevance. What followed the schism?

THE AFTERMATH: WHAT FOLLOWED THE SCHISM?

The Separation. The tragedy of the Pantheism Controversy is that it did not end with a repentance. Dr. Kellogg, the brilliant mind, the tireless worker, refused to humble himself. He dug in. He used his influence to pull others—including E.J. Waggoner and A.T. Jones—into his orbit. The result was a schism that tore the church apart. The Battle Creek Sanitarium became a rival center of influence, independent of the General Conference. Kellogg was eventually disfellowshipped in 1907. He kept the Sanitarium, but he lost the Message. He died in 1943, a man who had healed thousands of bodies but had severed himself from the Body of Christ.

The Fires of Judgment. The physical outcomes were just as stark. The Review and Herald burned in 1902. The Battle Creek Sanitarium burned in 1902. Sr. White interpreted these not as accidents, but as judgments. “I saw that the sword of fire was turning this way and that way… The destruction of the Review and Herald building… is a speakable warning”. God was purifying His people. He would rather have His institutions burn to the ground than have them become vehicles for the “Alpha of deadly heresies.” Revealing His role clearly, God purifies through trials. A passage from Testimonies for the Church reminds us: “God brings His people near Him by close, testing trials, by showing them their own weakness and inability, and by teaching them to lean upon Him as their only help and safeguard” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 4, p. 143, 1875). Through inspired counsel we are told: “Afflictions, crosses, temptations, adversity, and our varied trials are God’s workmen to refine us, sanctify us, and fit us for the heavenly garner” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 3, p. 115, 1872). “For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth” (Hebrews 12:6, KJV). “My son, despise not the chastening of the Lord; neither be weary of his correction” (Proverbs 3:11, KJV). The outcomes teach divine purification. What heralds the endgame?

THE OMEGA: WHAT HERALDS THE ENDGAME?

Sr. White warned that the “Omega” would follow “in a little while” and would be of a “most startling nature”. For us, the Omega is the final battle. If the Alpha was the depersonalization of God into nature, the Omega may well be the misrepresentation of God within the church structure itself. The perspective often identifies the Omega with the continued drift of the mainline Adventist church away from the distinctive pillars established by the pioneers. The abandonment of the specific Sanctuary theology. The embrace of Trinitarian creeds that mirror Catholic theology rather than the biblical “personality of God.” The return to the “medical” focus without the “gospel” distinctives (hospital systems that serve pork, for example). The “Omega” is the “Alpha” matured. It is the “intellectual philosophy” becoming the official policy. Scripture reveals that end-time deceptions intensify. The inspired pen notes: “The omega will be of a most startling nature” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 197, 1958). A prophetic voice once wrote: “Satan is working by every deception he can command that we may not discern this love” (Selected Messages Book 1, p. 156, 1958). “And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many” (Matthew 24:11, KJV). “For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect” (Matthew 24:24, KJV). The endgame demands vigilance. Who stands as watchman?

THE WATCHMAN ON THE WALL

The smoke over Battle Creek has long since cleared. The Sanitarium is a federal building now. Kellogg is a name on a cereal box to the world, a warning sign to the faithful. But the “boot” is still there. The temptation to find God in the “science” of the world rather than the “silence” of the Sanctuary is ever-present. The temptation to replace the “Man on the Throne” with the “Ghost in the Machine” is the eternal error of the intellect. As we are the engineers on the ship. The cry has gone out: “Iceberg ahead!” You know what it looks like. You know the “Alpha.” Do not let the ship strike the “Omega” in the dark. Hold fast to the “old landmarks.” Preach the distinct, personal, loving God who sits on the throne. And when men tell you that God is in the grass, tell them, “No. He is in the Holy of Holies. And He is waiting for you.” Christ, as our High Priest, ministers in the true tabernacle pitched by the Lord, not by man. In The Great Controversy we read: “The subject of the sanctuary and the investigative judgment should be clearly understood by the people of God” (The Great Controversy, p. 488, 1911). A passage from Patriarchs and Prophets reminds us: “Thus in the ministration of the tabernacle, and of the temple that afterward took its place, the people were taught each day the great truths relative to Christ’s death and ministration” (Patriarchs and Prophets, p. 358, 1890). “Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need” (Hebrews 4:16, KJV). “Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession” (Hebrews 4:14, KJV). The call urges steadfast faithfulness.

KEY THEOLOGICAL DISTINCTIONS

The Personality of God vs. The Alpha Heresy.

1. The “Presence” Fallacy.

a. The Heresy: Kellogg argued that because God’s power is everywhere, His person is everywhere.

b. The Biblical Counter: The sun is millions of miles away, but its light and heat fill the earth. We say “the sun is in the room,” but the actual star is not in the room. So God sits in Heaven, but His Spirit (His agency) fills the universe. (Reference: The Ministry of Healing, p. 418).

2. The “Incarnation” Fallacy. The Heresy: Kellogg taught that every human is an incarnation of God. “The Lord Jesus is in everything.” The Biblical Counter: The Incarnation of Christ was a unique, one-time event. “The Word was made flesh” (John 1:14). We are “temples of the Holy Spirit” (1 Cor 6:19) by adoption and indwelling, not by constitution. We are not little gods; we are houses for the Spirit.

3. The “Sanctuary” Fallacy. The Heresy: If the body is the temple, the Heavenly Sanctuary is a metaphor. The Biblical Counter: The earthly sanctuary was a “pattern of things in the heavens” (Hebrews 9:23). A pattern implies a literal reality. If there is no literal Sanctuary, there is no Investigative Judgment, and the 1844 message is a lie. This is why the Alpha is “deadly”—it kills the reason for the existence of the Remnant Church.

Scripture reveals that distinctions preserve truth. Through inspired counsel we are told: “The personality of God, His presence, and His love, must be presented to all who come within the sphere of your influence” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 599, 1889). A prophetic voice once wrote: “The Lord Jesus Christ is to be our example in all things” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 9, p. 151, 1909). “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me” (John 14:6, KJV). “Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?” (John 14:9, KJV). The distinctions equip against heresy.

SELF-REFLECTION

How can I deepen my grasp of these truths in daily devotion, letting them mold my character?

How can we make these themes accessible to varied groups, preserving accuracy?

What common errors exist in my community, and how can I correct them biblically and through Sr. White?

How can our communities embody hope, reflecting Christ’s return and victory over evil?

For more articles, please go to http://www.faithfundamentals.blog or our podcast at: https://rss.com/podcasts/the-lamb.

If you have a prayer request, please leave it in the comments below. Prayer meetings are held on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. To join, enter your email address in the comments section.